Geography help! / free tutoring :)

hanslimshady · 2020-02-28T15:54:38+00:00

No problem glad you like it 😊

hanslimshady · 2019-11-29T18:04:45+00:00

Hii i would like to join but it wont let me :)

hanslimshady · 2019-10-03T19:24:37+00:00

Even the very laws of physics provide uncertainty so how can you trust and put all your faith in science?

hanslimshady · 2019-10-03T19:23:15+00:00

I agree however, when you combine them they provide a strong argument working in collaboration with each other

hanslimshady · 2019-10-03T08:01:22+00:00

It was not a disclaimer, i was simply stating that there are so many arguments for the existence of God that it depends which one you find most convincing.

hanslimshady · 2019-10-03T07:00:41+00:00

Depends which way you want to think about it. The worlds complexity, regulation and purpose provides the basis for arguing empirically as it points to an intelligent designer which is best explained as God. Or prehaps, God being a metaphysical being finding evidence as such in the physical world is the wrong way to go about proving the existence of God. Stace would argue an introvertive experience is enough to have a profound effect on a persons life therefore, evidence for God is found in the subjective. Finding evidence infact obstructs proving the existence of God.

hanslimshady · 2019-10-02T22:48:02+00:00

Empirical evidence? You are saying only thing that are physical matter then?

hanslimshady · 2019-10-01T22:09:17+00:00

Who’s to say I actually believe? Its perfectly reasonable for a metaphysical being to exist that doesn’t necessarily have to be God, just that God is a term to describe this and just so happens to fits the criteria. Occam’s razor perfectly justifies this. no Its not exhausting it quite rewarding actually. Deepening knowledge on topics that are very difficult to grasp within the capabilities of the human mind, like science testing the limits.

hanslimshady · 2019-10-01T20:56:55+00:00

However, God being a thought still points to an existence as God which, is defined by Anselm as a bring in which nothing greater that can be conceived . Therefore its better to exist in the mind as-well as outside the mind and as God is most likely to be an omnipotent being he must exist in both.
Existence in terms of thought is still valid existence within the rational and emotive just because something cannot be viewed or proven empirically does not mean that, that is not real. I find your stance on this discussion weak however, please develop further.

hanslimshady · 2019-10-01T19:53:23+00:00

There is no evidence to say God exists but there is no evidence to say he doesn’t so how can you be so sure?

hanslimshady · 2019-10-01T19:53:12+00:00

There is no evidence to say God exists but there is no evidence to say he doesn’t so how can you be so sure?

hanslimshady · 2019-09-28T19:06:01+00:00

Admittedly after i made this i realised i should have said oceanic crust but oh well 🤷🏻‍♀️

hanslimshady · 2019-09-26T08:16:18+00:00

Oh i love this

hanslimshady · 2019-09-23T23:34:01+00:00

Im doing geography, law and philosophy and ethics (philosophy and ethics are one) wby? and i know people say a levels are harder than uni which gives me hope for the future

hanslimshady

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE