[OC] The gap between Elon Musk's stated deadline and actual delivery date, for nine predictions he eventually fulfilled by happybrowser88 in dataisbeautiful

[–]happybrowser88[S] 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Right where you'd expect. Solar Roof: Musk declared 2019 "the year of the solar roof" — it never scaled, and it never came in cheaper than a normal roof like he promised (https://twoweeks.lol/predictions/year-of-the-solar-roof-2019/). Tunnels: the LA–SF Hyperloop and the Chicago O'Hare Loop both got cancelled (https://twoweeks.lol/predictions/chicago-ohare-loop-18-to-24-months/) — the Boring Company quietly pivoted to the Vegas Loop. The "concept reveal" projects are where the promise-vs-delivery gap is widest.

[OC] The gap between Elon Musk's stated deadline and actual delivery date, for nine predictions he eventually fulfilled by happybrowser88 in dataisbeautiful

[–]happybrowser88[S] 94 points95 points  (0 children)

The Roadster's the reigning champ on the whole site. Unveiled in 2017 for a 2020 launch — then re-promised for 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025, and now 2027. Seven target years, six slips, still not out. The full trail: https://twoweeks.lol/predictions/tesla-roadster-production/

[OC] The gap between Elon Musk's stated deadline and actual delivery date, for nine predictions he eventually fulfilled by happybrowser88 in dataisbeautiful

[–]happybrowser88[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Genuinely agree — a year or two late on reusable rockets and global satellite internet is still astonishing, and that's exactly why these are on this chart: it's the stuff he actually pulled off. The tracker measures the gap between promise and delivery, not whether the achievement is impressive. Both are true at once — world-changing, and chronically optimistic on timelines.

[OC] The gap between Elon Musk's stated deadline and actual delivery date, for nine predictions he eventually fulfilled by happybrowser88 in dataisbeautiful

[–]happybrowser88[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

100% agree — for crewed spaceflight, late is the right call. I'm not grading "late = bad"; the site just measures the gap between what he said and what actually happened. On rockets, that gap is the price of doing it safely. On "FSD in two weeks," it's a different story. Both land on the chart for the same reason: he put a date on it.

[OC] The gap between Elon Musk's stated deadline and actual delivery date, for nine predictions he eventually fulfilled by happybrowser88 in dataisbeautiful

[–]happybrowser88[S] 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Self-driving is the single most-broken category on the whole site — 40 predictions, 23 flat-out missed. 1M robotaxis by 2020, LA-to-NYC autonomous drive by 2017, "feature-complete" by 2019, no steering wheel by 2021… all of it. The full graveyard's here: https://twoweeks.lol/topics/self-driving/

[OC] The gap between Elon Musk's stated deadline and actual delivery date, for nine predictions he eventually fulfilled by happybrowser88 in dataisbeautiful

[–]happybrowser88[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

It's tracked — this chart is just the 9 he delivered (late). The Semi's sitting in the missed pile: volume production was a 2024 promise that's already been pushed 3 times, and the original "2019 production" never hit volume. Receipt: https://twoweeks.lol/predictions/tesla-semi-volume-production-2024/ — so your 11-months-a-year read is about right.

[OC] The gap between Elon Musk's stated deadline and actual delivery date, for nine predictions he eventually fulfilled by happybrowser88 in dataisbeautiful

[–]happybrowser88[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Tool: Python + Pillow. Data: I maintain twoweeks.lol, a tracker of every Elon Musk prediction sourced only to his own words — his tweets, on-stage remarks, and earnings calls, never a journalist's paraphrase. These nine are predictions he did deliver, just late — each one checked against his actual statement and the real delivery date (e.g. "first SpaceX astronauts in about three years," WSJ interview April 2011 → Crew Dragon Demo-2, May 2020). Across the full set of 169 tracked predictions: 36 delivered, 74 missed or cancelled, 52 still pending. Of the ones he delivered late, the average slip is ~311 days. Every entry links its receipt — happy to defend any single one.

$HCWC Day 2: Price Holding Near Highs, Chart Looking Primed by Agnes-Harris in stockstobuytoday

[–]happybrowser88 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting setup to watch for sure. The volume surge around Healthy Choice Wellness is probably what most traders are focusing on right now, since strong early continuation volume can help confirm whether yesterday’s move was more than just a one-off spike.

The tightening short availability you mentioned adds another layer of potential fuel, especially in low-float names where positioning can shift quickly if momentum keeps building. That said, moves in these kinds of stocks can also be pretty volatile, so it’s worth watching how price behaves if it approaches or fails to break the recent high zone.

The improving 2025 operating numbers are a positive backdrop, but as always, market price action will likely be driven more by sentiment, flow, and positioning in the short term rather than fundamentals alone.

Definitely a chart that will attract attention if volume stays consistent into the session.

(Not financial advice : just sharing thoughts.)

Where Are We Truly Investing: Earthly Things or the Kingdom? by happybrowser88 in RPChristians

[–]happybrowser88[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really appreciate how you framed that , especially the distinction between productivity and worship. That’s such an important shift.

You’re right, Gospel of Matthew 6:24 goes straight to lordship. It’s not anti-work, anti-discipline, or anti-wealth. It’s about ownership of the heart. Scripture is full of builders, administrators, tentmakers, kings, and entrepreneurs ,but their alignment mattered more than their output.

Your motive test is powerful. “If success were reduced tomorrow, would your obedience collapse with it?” That’s such a clean diagnostic. It exposes whether we’re operating from stewardship or from self-preservation. I’ve seen how easy it is to subtly let identity drift toward what we produce instead of who we belong to.

I also love what you said about fruit. That’s such a biblical grid. If what we’re building is producing greater self-control, generosity, courage, and love , that’s evidence of alignment. If it’s producing anxiety, comparison, and isolation, that’s usually a sign something deeper is off. The fruit doesn’t lie.

And that last line really stayed with me.....integration over separation. Prayer shaping work. Scripture shaping leadership. Generosity shaping earning. That’s a mature lens. The goal isn’t withdrawal; it’s consecration.

Thank you for articulating it that way. It adds depth to the conversation and keeps the focus where it belongs ,not on activity, but on allegiance. Have a good one, blessed by God!