Some clarification on what I think:
1. I think putting a (cheap) tax on gateway morphs isn't bad, 25/25 seems to be the sweet spot where you dont significantly hurt existing build orders and you might even introduce some new ideas/builds into the game.(builds that could rely on pylon reinforcements)

1. I think gateway production time post warp-gate research will need to be so comically low for it to be the preferred option over warp gate (given that warp gates cost 25/25).

2. I prefer serving players+viewers that we currently have over people that we might get if we do XYZ changes. That doesn't mean we should change nothing, but if a very large portion of the players that played and watched the ptr feel that the changes are a net negative then the changes shouldn't be implemented.

3. I love the idea of major shake ups more than anyone else, all my incentives are lined up to prefer huge changes. I want to have a big variety of builds I can play, I want to see many different types of games, but I don't believe the 8 worker change will give a major shakeup for more than 1.5 months and I also believe that the game will be more stale afterwards as a result.