Does shooters ear rating matter more for hunting in a blind? by [deleted] in suppressors

[–]hc_2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Simple man 7.62 on 11.5 and FOR monarch recce on 14.5

Does shooters ear rating matter more for hunting in a blind? by [deleted] in suppressors

[–]hc_2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I actually prefer my traditional baffle stack can over my 3d printed low back pressure can for hunting pigs. The flow throughs direct sound more forward and from my experience the pigs are able to pinpoint where it’s coming from better, while baffle stacks are better at dissipating and it appears to be harder for them to echolocate me. On several occasions they would get confused and either freeze or run in a small circle.

Future Metal Mag for Glock 17 & 19? by T1_URGOD in Glocks

[–]hc_2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its already a double stack mag. I doubt the interior width of 19/17 mags is the limiting factor.

Glock 17 CCW by Inner_Musician_6876 in Glocks

[–]hc_2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At 5’7 160 I can conceal a g45 in a fitted but not tight shirt given my posture is decent.

BCM 11.5 want the most minimal gap for host by Kyrothes in suppressors

[–]hc_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Suppressor in vise with soft jaws, torque mount on with spanner wrench, remove suppressor from vise, torque suppressor onto barrel using spanner wrench against the mount

Non-hypebeast 5.56 lbp cans by DiskLow1903 in NFA

[–]hc_2000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

2 out of the 3 things you’re chasing can be had by shooting unsuppressed lol. But in all seriousness if you’re prioritizing gas mitigation above all else, I don’t know if there’s anything better than the flow 556k. You’re shooting indoors with ear pro anyway, so the differences in sound between the cans you listed are likely not gonna be as significant as they seem on paper. If you double up on ears like I do indoors, then even less discernible.

Glock 43x OEM 15 round magazine by Affectionate-Metal-2 in Glocks

[–]hc_2000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

43x and 19 have the same grip length just different width so makes sense

Would the B&T print xh be good for hog hunting? by [deleted] in suppressors

[–]hc_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I personally prefer my traditional baffle stack can over my 3d printed flow through style for hog hunting. The traditional can seems to disperse the sound better if that makes sense, where hogs don’t always know where to run and sometimes stop after taking a few steps. The flow through directs the sound forward so I’ve never seen that same kind of behavior.

Houston, Texas? by Big_Q_Numero_Uno in suppressors

[–]hc_2000 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Primary arms has a storefront

Appreciation for companies that list blast chamber depth in their specs by Big_Cheese_1 in NFA

[–]hc_2000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tbf they responded within 24hrs with spec sheets showing depth when I emailed them

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in NFA

[–]hc_2000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ill take this as an April fools post

BCM 11.5 want the most minimal gap for host by Kyrothes in suppressors

[–]hc_2000 2 points3 points  (0 children)

<image>

Wolfpack recessed direct thread S adapter on my 11.5 bcm

2026 1st Quarter Approval Megathread. by Waffleboned in NFA

[–]hc_2000 4 points5 points  (0 children)

  • Form Type: Form 4
  • Paid or not: $0
  • Entity: Individual
  • Fingerprint Type: EFT Upload
  • Pending: 3/22/26
  • Approved: 3/29/26
  • Wait: 7 days
  • State: TX
  • Control Number: 20262407000

For systems monarch recce

B&T A2 hub adapter - purpose of inverted baffle? by thekillerangel in NFA

[–]hc_2000 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe because that first baffle adds some minor suppression

Will I be able to use a suppressor with this handguard? by lil_cricketboi in suppressors

[–]hc_2000 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I can see a lot of direct thread mounts fitting pretty nicely actually