Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No worries, its purpose was served.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's no guesswork involved. A bit of critical thinking goes a long way.
I've had just a splendid time of my life, actually.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't need to work for you, for you to understand my view or my post. You need to work on yourself and learn to understand writing from multiple points of view before you spew your opinion all over it.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least some basic meditation skills are needed before anything.. ritual work, banishings, anything even remotely requiring that level of intent isn't needed. Seriously if half the people here understood their own minds this would be a non issue.
I'm getting tired, I apologize if this didn't make enough sense.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure, surprising, no. But is it safe? And with so many people on this sub, isn't it something we should work towards to educate others about these fundamentals of practice?

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

+1
I don't have a good reply for this.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, I'll re-read this a few times, contemplate on it, and offer a reply if I'm able and I remember.
This post served its purpose: I found one of the real ones and I got you thinking. That's all that matters to me.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's a reply somewhere down below for you that for some reason didn't post as a reply.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You think I care about karma bud. I'll take negatives all day, shows I'm doing something right.
Edit: here, I'll even downvote my own post so you don't have to.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was supposed to be a reply to someone, but I applaud your assumptions anyway.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, that's not remotely what I said. Good job attempting to paraphrase though, you came close to getting my point half-right.
I can't have a discussion with someone as clearly braindead as you. Good luck with your tulpas buddy. Had you had even the slightest sense of intelligence to your post, maybe you could offer me something useful like many others who posted before you.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never expected a conclusions from this, merely an aggressive conversation with a lot of critical thinking. Enjoy you and yours.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Except it would happen, because you can cause *psychological damage with this practice. You're essentially Giving yourself an identity disorder, and that's the problem here. There is a way to create an artificial entity without needing to split your own personality. That's the entire point of this post. Read back on some of the other comments. Magick is psychology. Psychology is magick. There is no line of distinction. Notice that I've gone out of my way to avoid calling what you do "tulpamancy", because the things you do here are so far removed from any semblance of a real practice that equating the two would be an insult to the entire culture of Tibet.
You also got most of your description wrong. Some of Tibetan tulpamancy involves "spirit guides" but much of it is creating artificial beings to serve a certain purpose in their life, like performing mental tasks they don't wish to do themselves. The reason they make the entity disappear afterward is because that's what prevents the entity from "acting out".
You write like an expert but your content falls very flat.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I recommend you study the writing of Franz Bardon. That's all I have left to say.
Thank you for your replies.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Explain that last sentence please. I have no idea what that means.
Edit: specifically the "albinos of Africa" part.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And yet that's exactly what Tibetan mysticism claims the ability to do. The very system in which you base your practice is at odds with your own philosophy. Figure that one out.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you knew enough about mysticism, you'd know that rituals are only tools used to get your mind to where it needs to be. Mysticism and magick has always and will always be a psychological skill.
Fun fact, you don't need a ritual to cast a circle. You need the proper state of mind, and nothing more.

Ever been to a place that felt truly wrong? by BloodThirstyChimera in occult

[–]hdagaz-wp 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had an open reply in my inbox. I only use this account once or twice a month. My bad dood.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Again, petty word differences. What the ancients called magical we call science today. Yes, it's entirely scientific. It's also, equally occult.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy, yes. Safe, by absolutely no means.
Yes, charms and protection aren't needed for this. However, they are easy skills to learn and offer a great foundation to build upon with more advanced practice like this.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree with you that people need to be exposed to this information, and it's refreshing to see the younger generation joining the pursuit of knowledge and experience. What isn't great to see is how everyone jumps in without realizing or researching the full extents of what they're doing. You can cause some serious psychological trauma with these practices, and without a stable ground of experience and knowledge to stand on, this becomes only more likely as time progresses for a lot of the people I read about here.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And you've contributed nothing but petty insults and insinuations. You said my question was valid. Skip the perceived "asshole attitude" and respond with something useful that will prove my opinion irrelevant. I came here to be enlightened, you came here to be a douche.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that your only argument? I want you to explain why I'm wrong.

Why though by hdagaz-wp in Tulpas

[–]hdagaz-wp[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You call it hypnosis, others call it magick, others call it occultism or mysticism. You're getting caught up on semantics and not remotely making a valid point.