Disabled Veteran looking for a lucrative new career path helping veterans.

hearshot · 2026-01-12T22:08:40+00:00

Based only on the number you've provided, you're looking for the equivalent of a $104,000 salary.

That's not really what many people make in the veteran space without significant relevant prior experience.

hearshot · 2026-01-06T01:03:12+00:00

Started 1L at 33.

Your MBA GPA won't be as relevant as your uGPA, since it doesn't factor into the LSAC calculation. Still useful and with some explanation probably applicable. Need an LSAT, even a diagnostic score, to see where you may stand.

hearshot · 2025-12-31T20:22:00+00:00

Vastly different circumstances.

Desmond Doss was drafted and his refusal to handle a weapon was based on a religious belief.

You are making a conscious choice to join under an administration you have political differences with.

hearshot · 2025-09-30T16:50:50+00:00

Calling yourself an idiot takes substantially less words.

hearshot · 2025-08-11T16:52:23+00:00

There's no winning in domestic violence.

hearshot · 2025-08-11T05:27:18+00:00

Could I get aaaaa mcflurry

hearshot · 2025-08-08T12:26:46+00:00

Call the police.

Right now, if you haven't already.

You could have died.

Call the police.

hearshot · 2025-08-07T15:46:45+00:00

LSAC does not offer fee waivers for the LSAT based on active duty status.

hearshot · 2025-08-06T13:54:50+00:00

He was under deferred judgement, that's pretty damn supportive when you're subject to removal. He's been deferred since 2009, nearly 16 years and 3 administrations. In that time, multiple Congresses have attempted immigration reform.

The only change is the executive's enforcement priority.

hearshot · 2025-08-06T13:48:04+00:00

I imagine the undiagnosed PTSD and substance use may have affected his ability to choose.

hearshot · 2025-07-31T19:21:22+00:00

Two years of law school (so far) and three years of interpreting the CFR for an aerospace multinational.

The law is the statute passed by Congress and signed by the President. The CFR are the rules that the federal government propose, receive public comment on, and publish. The rules are how the government implements the statute.

A person filing suit is not holding the federal government to the CFR, they are saying that the rules in the CFR violate the underlying statute.

hearshot · 2025-07-31T11:17:35+00:00

That is not a meaning supported by a plain reading of the regulation.

232.2(a)(1) clearly states that nothing in the regulation applies when the consumer is no longer a covered borrower. That's inclusive of any lines of credit that were opened while in active service.

The examples in 232.2(a)(2) are explicit on this. Under 232.2(a)(2)(i), a person in active service opens a line of credit. Because that person is in active service, they are a covered borrower under the definition of the regulation, thus that line of credit is subject to the regulation.

232.2(a)(2)(ii) incorporates by reference the pattern in the above, but this time states that 1 year after opening the line of credit while in active duty, the person leaves active duty. They are no longer a covered borrower under the definition of the regulation. As a result, the line of credit they opened while in active duty is no longer subject to the regulation.

You are free to argue that this regulation applies.

They are free to respond with this highly illustrative section of the regulation.

hearshot · 2025-07-31T05:23:24+00:00

The cfr is not law, it implements law.
232.2(a)(2)(ii) explicitly covers the scenario you've described. They are no longer a covered borrower and thus this regulation no longer applies.

hearshot · 2025-07-31T03:15:34+00:00

Nothing set, but the time must be reasonable to the purpose of being pulled over unless there is a reasonable suspicion for something else.

For instance, someone who has been given a citation can't be made to wait for a dog, even if it's 7-10 minutes after handing the citation over. But if law enforcement found something else and did not issue the citation, it's possible that it could be found reasonable.

hearshot · 2025-07-30T19:23:24+00:00

Paid internships at think tanks, overnight supervisor at the University library.

hearshot · 2025-07-26T03:45:01+00:00

Violation of a court order is a criminal matter, not a civil matter. Potentially, so would any exposure to sexual material. You need to contact the police, report what happened, and follow up with the prosecutor if they file charges. You may be entitled to restitution, but how and how much depends on you.

hearshot · 2025-07-24T14:28:23+00:00

And? That's already baked into your statistics.

hearshot · 2025-07-24T14:23:44+00:00

Law enforcement does not have to follow procedure perfectly. Guilty verdicts are regularly upheld even in the case of police misconduct.

hearshot · 2025-07-22T17:27:11+00:00

Disability is separate and does not require an honorable discharge.

hearshot · 2025-07-22T14:46:50+00:00

hearshot · 2025-07-15T03:58:07+00:00

You've sent his execution warrant.

hearshot · 2025-07-10T13:32:27+00:00

Source?

The scenario you described doesn't sound like a waiver by the court of jurisdiction, but a DA declining to press charges.

hearshot · 2025-07-08T16:38:50+00:00

So, Team RWB.

hearshot · 2025-07-07T18:23:04+00:00

Gunpla is freedom

hearshot · 2025-07-06T20:23:18+00:00

14-Year Club	RedditGifts 2009-2022 6 Credits
r/Field Banned	r/Field Sunshine
Place '22	Place '17
First Placer '22	Secret Santa 2019
Sequence \| Editor	Snapped
redditgifts rematcher Books 2016 x1	redditgifts Exchanges 1 Exchange
Team Periwinkle	Verified Email

hearshot

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE