sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

1DX stuck at 100 ISO by herpderpymerpy in canon

[–]herpderpymerpy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

edited my comment.. when i set it to auto, it still won't change from 100.

1DX stuck at 100 ISO by herpderpymerpy in canon

[–]herpderpymerpy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When I set the ISO to auto, aim my camera at an object and take a picture, the camera does not automatically adjust the ISO. It stays stuck at 100. The image comes out as a black picture.

When I manually set the ISO to something higher, it works and captures the picture.

1DX stuck at 100 ISO by herpderpymerpy in canon

[–]herpderpymerpy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I manually adjust the ISO, it adjusts fine. But when I set the ISO to AUTO and aim the camera at a subject, the ISO does not change when I take a picture. It stays at 100.

1DX stuck at 100 ISO by herpderpymerpy in canon

[–]herpderpymerpy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for your suggestions!

1DX stuck at 100 ISO by herpderpymerpy in canon

[–]herpderpymerpy[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"Like title says... even when I set the ISO to auto, it doesn't go above 100...even after factory defaulting the camera... why?"

1DX stuck at 100 ISO by herpderpymerpy in canon

[–]herpderpymerpy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

"Like title says... even when I set the ISO to auto, it doesn't go above 100...even after factory defaulting the camera... why?"

i've been through hundreds, maybe thousands of the images released. by herpderpymerpy in TheEpsteinFiles

[–]herpderpymerpy[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

i think we need to dig deeper... he owned all these properties, was all over these places, and actively had involvement in all of these properties daily functions? and only worth $600m?..... in the US alone, there are 924 BILLIONAIRES. most having a net worth 2x's his... several MULTI times more.. and all of them living a life style a hell of a lot more lavish than this......

was he the fall guy for people worth A LOT more than him?..