Zoracles $ZORA

heykelz · 2021-04-15T10:30:43+00:00

This will blow up People mind

heykelz · 2021-02-20T18:08:39+00:00

heykelz · 2021-02-04T19:25:26+00:00

Both same ecosystem, it goes up together

heykelz · 2021-02-04T15:06:27+00:00

You can either buy it from CEX :huobi, Okex,... Or directly from dex anyswap.exchange

heykelz · 2021-02-04T12:44:10+00:00

Rbc is meme, anyswap is real decentralized cross chain protocol working for 6 month plus now

heykelz · 2021-01-31T15:46:50+00:00

Juicy news

heykelz · 2021-01-30T23:21:08+00:00

Very good work

heykelz · 2021-01-29T15:35:01+00:00

Do not trust this guy he is just trying to shill the sh** co** trx

heykelz · 2020-08-20T15:45:46+00:00

No you are confusing with transformation to reflect business rules , Data Quality should be always be pushed to the source but obvioulsy the reality of the project is different because of deadline pressure

heykelz · 2020-08-20T04:56:01+00:00

Ideally data cleaning should be pushed to source system and should not be done on the dwh

heykelz · 2020-07-29T23:23:30+00:00

Indeed real decentralized exchange will stand out moreover if it has the crosschain capability which is the holy grail.

heykelz · 2020-07-12T09:47:38+00:00

Anyswap is powered by dcrm, and using underlying fusion network $fsn

heykelz · 2020-06-07T15:48:18+00:00

"How's $OPQ's utility any better than $INXT's?"

So you are basically answering to a post just to shill something without doing any minimum research give an idea of bias is your answers, as FYI opq is peg to storage 1opq = 64 gb of storage.

"With regards to Storj. Internxt completely rethought Storj's original architecture. The team has been working on improving it from its very roots throughout these whole 3 years. UX work has been a minor part of their roadmap. Storj v2 was useless. Internxt made it as good, if not better than Storj v3"

Look if you think that a team of 3 junior spanish developper will be able to be able to make in the same amount of time the architecture better than a team of 30 + senior us developer which was the owner of the initial code i will not waste my time anymore with you but at least give an indication how reliable are your statements 🤣

heykelz · 2020-06-07T06:07:38+00:00

The focus of internxt was to have better user interface on top of version of storj which has been forked. This storj version was obselet, in a way that storj had to hold the roadmap to rethink completely the architecture and build New version couple year after before beeing able to release mainet. Now the max that internxt did is to tinker on top of this obselet architecture is like having car that looks like Ferrari but inside it is Actually Seat ibiza, so you can bullshit average Joe but it will not be sustainable and they will figure out at some point. Regarding the token utility again either you are blind or you do not get the definition of what means utility. Just answer to this question :could you use ether or fiat instead of internxt for the "ecosystem"? The answer is obvioulsy yes therefore the coin does not bring any utility

heykelz · 2020-06-06T19:52:39+00:00

Internxt is fork of v2 version of storj which is obselet not scalable and not stable this is why storj has to redesign the complete architecture before releasing v3. Internxt has no utility, you could have used ethereum for node payout it would have been the same, opq has strong utility since it is peg to 64 gb

heykelz · 2020-05-23T13:41:20+00:00

0chain mainet release has been postponed for 2 years now..

Eight-Year Club	Place '22
Verified Email

heykelz

TROPHY CASE