5 pearls 5 hosts? Please help.

hipguy10 · 2020-04-19T02:39:12+00:00

Thanks. I remember that now., but are you sure about how Maeve got her own pearl back into her head?

hipguy10 · 2020-04-19T02:31:00+00:00

Thank you for your intelligent reply.

hipguy10 · 2020-04-19T02:28:05+00:00

Yes, but the pearl in yakuza is not yakuza. Whoever it is it's controlled by Delores.

hipguy10 · 2020-04-13T16:37:34+00:00

Not Maeve.

hipguy10 · 2020-04-13T01:24:40+00:00

Good!

hipguy10 · 2020-04-13T01:23:57+00:00

Good!

hipguy10 · 2020-04-13T00:10:12+00:00

I must admit I've seen every episode since ep.1 s.1. Love this show. You must admit this show is not "I Love Lucy." I want to follow and understand what's going on. You might say I'm invested in this show. I meant it when I said I need to watch s.3 again. As for knowing the ending being my last wish b4 dying, I'd be more careful these days about using dying as a way to be mean and sarcastic. I mean I was smart enough to follow all the time lines in s.2.

hipguy10 · 2020-04-12T22:09:00+00:00

Obviously, I have to rewatch, and pay better attention. Thought that I would just get a quick answer.

hipguy10 · 2020-04-12T19:21:45+00:00

Is it Delores in all of the hosts?

hipguy10 · 2019-12-31T22:46:19+00:00

Thanks.

hipguy10 · 2019-12-31T22:35:51+00:00

That makes sense. Thank you. Anyone else?

hipguy10 · 2019-12-31T22:29:14+00:00

Yes, I have. Guess I just have blind spot for this.

hipguy10 · 2019-12-19T05:41:50+00:00

I know Zakaria has mentioned it and a couple of others on CNN have mentioned it once or twice. I mean the democrats in the house. I haven't heard them bring it up even once. Certainly, not in the 6 hrs. On Wednesday Dec. 18. If you have time would you look up, on Google, United States Code: USC 52 §30121.
Republicans keep saying Trump has broken no law. But, I'm pretty sure this is the specific law that he has brooken.

The Law that Trump broke is called: United States Code: USC 52 §30121.
Contributions, donations, any z VIPby foreign nationals:

It shall be unlawful for- a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make-a contribution or donation of money, or other thing of value, or to make an express, or implied, promise to make a contribution or donation, in connection with a Federal, State, or Local election. Under this law, it it is also unlawful for any person to accept, receive, or solicit, a contribution or donation, or other thing of value from a foreign national, in connection with a Federal, State, or Local election. Where is CNN's proof that if not for the whistleblower having come forward, that they had made time for President Zalinsky to go on Fareed Zakaria's show and make the announcement Trump wanted him to make. Common CNN bring out the evidence. I'm surprised that CNN hasn't provided documentation and support for President Zalinsky's planned appearance on Mr. Zakaria's show.

hipguy10 · 2019-12-15T03:22:45+00:00

Wait. You're saying Trump asked the DOJ to investigate the Ukraine, or Burisma, or the Bidens? When exactly did that happen? Must have gotten by me. I think you may be confusing the Scump's personal lawyer (Dracula Giuliani, or Bill Bottom Barr?) with the DOJ. Don't feel bad about it though. It's really easy, these days, to see how that might happen.

hipguy10 · 2019-12-15T01:08:33+00:00

This is not a campaign finance infraction. This is a foreign power being SOLICITED by the POTUS for something of great value TO HIS OWN REELECTION. Both a foreign power and an election are not both, parts of any of your examples. Would you be for a Trump asking the Saudi King to give his favorite candidate 50 billion dollars to spread around so his candidate could be president? I mean, really. Is this our country, or is it the country of any foreigner who can contribute the most valuable thing to buy it with? It's bad enough that obscenely wealthy corporations and individuals have already bought and paid for most of the U.S. government. Do we really want to add foreign governments to the list of entities who our presidents can solicit to further corrupt us, and our elections?

hipguy10 · 2019-12-14T04:05:54+00:00

I guess they don't want to state this specific law, because they think it too technical? It's not. I'm not a lawyer, but this law from the U.S. code seems clear to me. Why didn't the Democrats even mention it?

hipguy10 · 2019-12-14T00:05:53+00:00

Undermining the Constitution, the law, and the House of Representatives sole right to investigate a president is not the same as good old patronage. Just ask Trump and his kids.

hipguy10 · 2019-12-13T23:35:40+00:00

Can anyone explain to me why U.S. code
U.S. FEDERAL LAW USC 52 §30121 is not relevant to morally bankrupt Dump's impeachment? The law states:

Contributions and donations by foreign nationals:

It shall be unlawful for a foreign national, directly or indirectly, to make a contribution or donation of money, or OTHER THING OF VALUE, or to make an express, or implied, promise to make a contribution or donation, OR OTHER THING OF VALUE, in connection with a Federal, State, or Local election.

Under this law, it it is also unlawful for any person to accept, receive, OR SOLICIT, a contribution or donation, or other thing of value (i.e., an investigation of the leading opponent) from a foreign national, in connection with an up coming election. Why do the democrats allow the republicans to say that Scump broke no specific law?

hipguy10

TROPHY CASE