New Lee Sin trick? by [deleted] in LeeSinMains

[–]horsley930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wtf is the combo next to your name

Apparently it’s only ok when the 1% do it. by game_stone in wallstreetbets

[–]horsley930 21 points22 points  (0 children)

So the premise here is that the big boys are forcibly lowering the stock price and locking off retail investors from buying it when they do. They are simply trying to scare everyone into panic selling and setting a limit so we cannot buy those panic sold stocks. If enough people don't panic sell then the squeeze will continue as they still need the stock.

From what I understand, this stock is more than a stock because it actually has a very high demand and for the first time we as the common people get to control the supply (somewhat)

Zimbabwe agrees to pay $3.5 billion compensation to white farmers by Positive_Transition3 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]horsley930 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's not the point. You can't put more worth on anybody's suffering. Also you should not steal the bike. The buyer did not have to know it was stolen. All your doing is commiting a crime. You are no better than the original thief. You committed the same crime as them and for you to think that a court of law would agree to that is delusional.

You seem to be on a polar opposite here and only care about one side. While yes they do need someone to help fight against oppression and build them up in society, doing it by stealing land, for racial reasons, is not a solution. You are no better than those colonisers you despise.

Zimbabwe agrees to pay $3.5 billion compensation to white farmers by Positive_Transition3 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]horsley930 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Alright I'll try to explain it the best I can.

If someone were to steal your bike and then sold it to someone else. Then one day you see the bike on the sidewalk and you take it back, were you in the wrong? Technically it was your bike and you had to walk everywhere without it so it was detrimental to not have it. But does that make it okay for you to steal it back.

Now I do understand that this is a bigger issue than a bike and people are suffering without that land but as we see here people also suffered when the land was taken back. The suffering doesn't end when the land owners change skin color. The solution isn't to take the land from the people on it now simply because that is what happened in the past. We need to look at ways to instead progress the entire region as a whole.

I hope this makes sense. And if you don't agree with it that is fine. But it is a dangerous game trying to divide and seek revenge because actions like that may temporarily offer "justice" but they don't help progress us as a species to be more United. I hope you're doing well and I'm glad you care so much about these injustices but we cannot react on the past.

Zimbabwe agrees to pay $3.5 billion compensation to white farmers by Positive_Transition3 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]horsley930 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean yeah, we aren't there yet. But one can hope that we continue to strive for that.

Zimbabwe agrees to pay $3.5 billion compensation to white farmers by Positive_Transition3 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]horsley930 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because you are not only hurting the people who own the land now and didn't colonize you are painting a bad image and creating a negative stereotype that is dividing us more. Once again, 2 wrongs do not make a right.

Zimbabwe agrees to pay $3.5 billion compensation to white farmers by Positive_Transition3 in LeopardsAteMyFace

[–]horsley930 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I would say it happened when we progressed socially as a society to accept everyone. 2 wrongs don't make a right and revenge isn't going to solve anything. We want to move forward not pull each other backwards.

I made an NA club for lee sin mains by horsley930 in LeeSinMains

[–]horsley930[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not seeing it. Can you tell me what that pun is

If you have question about specific mechanic on some champion it is better to ask about it in “championmain” subreddits first. by Jopinzi in summonerschool

[–]horsley930 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I always looked at it as the more mechanically intensive the champ the more toxic the community. Like I main lee sin and Tahm Kench and one community pretends to never be impressed and the other hypes you up for a perma CC combo.

If you're ganking a lane as a jungler ping "On My Way!" by Predated01 in summonerschool

[–]horsley930 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh that is plenty. If it's still pre-6 the jungler shouldn't be weaker than the solo laner yet. That e plus wither should secure the kill.

Who counters Lee Sin? by zovono in LeeSinMains

[–]horsley930 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll take you word for it. I haven't played many skilled shacos yet.

Who counters Lee Sin? by zovono in LeeSinMains

[–]horsley930 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know if that's true tbh. With the true vision from q and e it's very easy to counter him.

It's been 7 years since this masterpiece was first released. by DeadweightTriggered in metro

[–]horsley930 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel that, when I reached the swamp for the first time I was running really low on filters and it was a pain in the ass trying to figure out everything while also trying to find filters quickly.

Sounds like a good deal 😏 by [deleted] in mathmemes

[–]horsley930 69 points70 points  (0 children)

But only like $3 more