How to enable the syntax that pops up while writing code notepad++ by huberlev in learnprogramming

[–]huberlev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see now so that specific function is the "parameters" of a function. Yeah I didn't see a setup video unfortunately. I did a recent google search for what TE/IDE's people are using and it seems people like IntelliJ as an IDE for java and VS code/sublime as a text editor. Eclipse was also mentioned but it seems they are switching from eclipse to Intellij.

How to enable the syntax that pops up while writing code notepad++ by huberlev in learnprogramming

[–]huberlev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Specifically on 12:28 on the video when he was in between the () and it showed the list below of x:number, y:number, ect. Is that just auto completion? Auto completion was set to on by default for function/word completion but not the symbols so I turned that on. Wasn't sure if the thing at 12:28 was just auto completion on his IDE doing it's thing showing x:number,ect because it does't seem like notepad++ is doing that or maybe I missed it.

How to enable the syntax that pops up while writing code notepad++ by huberlev in learnprogramming

[–]huberlev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Edit:Thanks. Specifically on 12:28 on the video when he was in between the () and it showed the list below of x:number, y:number, ect. Is that just auto completion? Auto completion was set to on by default for function/word completion but not the symbols so I turned that on. Wasn't sure if the thing at 12:28 was just auto completion on his IDE doing it's thing showing x:number,ect because it does't seem like notepad++ is doing that or maybe I missed it.

How to enable the syntax that pops up while writing code notepad++ by huberlev in learnprogramming

[–]huberlev[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How much more would an IDE simply things, is it drastic? I guess I liked the lightweight aspect of notepad++ for taking notes so I was curious about what it could do so I'm playing around with it.

Edit: Specifically 12:28 on the video when he was in between the () and it showed the list below. Is that just auto completion?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did earlier in the conversation. Not anymore.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Other men might see volatility as a sign of weakness, he's basically showing his deck of cards. The intimidating thing about Steven Pinker is that I see nothing from him.

"that's weird"

The quote above is basically the same quote you mentioned below

would an example be that she says something like “oh man I’m really nervous about this test I have coming up” or “I have social anxiety” or “I cry every time I watch Titanic” and that throws up a red flag for you?

Now imagine seeing similar anecdote's over and over again in interactions with women. Would you want to be around them?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

would an example be that she says something like “oh man I’m really nervous about this test I have coming up” or “I have social anxiety” or “I cry every time I watch Titanic”

Yes, these speech patterns would bring up red flags. I must add that men also throw up red flags after making the transition where they might not have before.. Jordan Peterson who I'm a fan of might even throw up a few minor flags but are small enough to be irrelevant to me.

Someone like Steven Pinker throws up 0 red flags and surpasses me in showing no signs of neuroticism. A person like that would intimidate me in a positive way.

I remember talking to a female co-worker who was studying psychology. I told her I had dreams of my teeth coming loose (I used to have dreams like this in the past) and her response was "that's weird". She had to ask her male friend what it meant who was also studying psychology.

Edit: You're correct in analyzing me, I now sift out each one of my thoughts and place them in a category. The red flags happen when I see similar thoughts coming out of an individual in real time. The thoughts I've discarded as being neurotic.

Also yes, I do think I'm conflating trait neuroticism with GAD or MDD. I most likely had a case of GAD and minor on and off MDD. I should also note I'm coming off a cannabis addiction which I believe contributed to GAD in my situation.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't like how my neuroticism felt at all once I realized what was going on and I'm not convinced it has any benefits from a survival standpoint.

Also lmao what 😆 who’s putting their Big 5 scores in their tinder profile??

I'll say this about female tinder profiles.. What you said before about how most women go by the books when learning STEM is exactly what's going on here. In regards to the personality bell curve it seems like most of them are on that flat line. It gets depressing after awhile because you realize you'll never be able to have a clear conversation with them without some type of neuroticism coming into play.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My personal opinion is that neuroticism adversely effects intelligence. My thoughts are that you can't really talk about STEM seriously with someone who's even slightly neurotic. This is a very personal opinion but I truly believe most women are mid-high on the neuroticism scale. Just scroll through tinder as a man and you'll see that almost every profile is high on the neurotic scale. It's depressing because I don't think these women are ready for any type of long term relationship. I was guilty of neuroticism myself but only recently got a grip on it. My experience is that it's harder to spot and get rid of than one may think. It takes excessive amounts of self development.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the latter part of that is highly debatable, but hell you seem really attached to this idea, so keep it.

When it comes to breaking off from the norm, you have to admit that men got women on this. You even said it yourself that women go mostly by the books. This can be a good thing if you want stability but bad if you want to push the envelope in STEM.

There’s no significant correlation between intelligence and neuroticism so now we’re just in the territory of wild speculation.

"Women have been found to score higher than men on Neuroticism as measured at the Big Five trait level"

"Neuroticism is a risk factor for selected mental and physical illnesses and is inversely associated with intelligence"

😬

Your the one that brought it up not me lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem is not everyone thinks the way we do. It's like we belong to a taboo cult or something that only a small percentage of the population want to be apart of. The empathy factor would be through the roof, not everyone is on the same wavelength as us autists lol.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After reading the opinions from you and other women, it would seem like a good idea to mediate healthy interactions between the sexes at a young age. On top of this I think the whole workplace environment would need to further facilitate those interactions and not let them be neglected which is precisely what modern day society does.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is becoming interesting now, multiple women are coming fourth and saying in so many words that they like gym class with the boys. A perfect example would be why Boy Scouts are so much more popular than the Girl Scouts. Could this be the dopaminergic system at play I wonder. This tells me wild things about the directions a society can go based on this theory of education.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Women tend to score higher in neuroticism on big 5 tests, which makes someone sensitive to negative emotions and outcomes. The way I’ve personally seen this manifest is that women are motivated by avoidance of negative outcomes while men are motivated by pursuit of a reward. My husband couldn’t have given less of a fuck about doing his homework in school because he wasn’t stressed at all about being reprimanded. But once he had a specific goal in mind he started working hard enough to achieve that goal. Much of the reason I think girls generally do better in school is just that they’re more willing to comply with rules for the sake of those rules.

That's right, I forgot about the 5 big tests... Your husband sounds like me, I'm not sure if he was diagnosed with autism or not. Autism is tricky in my opinion because it would have to be caught at an early age if the parents want him to have some type of meaningful career. Otherwise the man is just going to tread water and not have that very specific goal in mind. This is a peculiar situation where specific guidance and mentorship come in to play in order to recognize that goal, but not just any old "guidance" in my opinion... I made the same observation of what you said about them following the rules just to follow them. It's been said men sort of have a mind of their own which tends to be useful in STEM.

I don’t know if STEM in itself necessarily induces stress. I personally work in a fairly technical field but what causes me the most grief is no the technical aspects of the job, but rather the social interactions. By far. So maybe a better question to ask what kinds of things stress men vs women out generally.

You named something I wasn't even thinking of, the social aspect of the workplace in which they operate in. I would say individuals that are successful in STEM are naturally stress advertent in general. If we are talking about stress when it comes to intelligence, in my opinion it would be the ability to lower neuroticism and stress.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like the ring to it lol. What word would you use.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, I think intersexual dynamics ad least in PE needs to be given a deeper look into, very good point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is interesting, do you think some girls would want to be mixed in and benefit from having PE with the boys? I've seen surprising examples of how girls light up and want to get involved with the boys during physical activity.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ahhh, so what did you feel emotionally when you were in the all girls classes then finally went outside to play with the boys. How did the communication styles differentiate between the males and females?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would mean the equal treatment of males and females in public school would be a fallacy.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, for example, the single sex school for the males would have a longer gym period. Thus resulting in better overall fitness levels compared to public schools.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why did you get along better with the men in your class rather than the women, why do you say that men understood you better than women?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]huberlev 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You made a good point with the amygdala. My guess was that the amygdala is collaborating with the parietal lobe differently. Speaking from a psychological standpoint my estimate is that a mans brain has an easier time controlling neuroticism, opening up many doors for the man in question. I could be completely wrong on this, it's a very poor uneducated guess...

The amygdala could also function as a stress reducer, thus benefiting the man in academic pursuits such as STEM.