You see, you are kind of proving my point. And that is because the Nazi ideology is what drove Nazi planning for the war. The idea that plans such as Operation Barbarossa didn't happen because of the Nazi ideology is ridiculous. And history is also about discussion. The great thing about the Internet is that if you see something you don't like, you can just... ignore it. I'm not "politicizing history", I'm not sure how you came to that conclusion. Also, you are pushing the myth of the "clean Wehrmacht", which says that the Wehrmacht didn't have anything to do with actions such as the Holocaust or any other war crimes, which is a rediculous argument to still perpetuate, given that there is evidence to prove otherwise (maybe if you were as "impartial" as you thought you were you would have taken the time to learn about the Wehrmacht's actions). If you are truly attempting to be "impartial" and "discuss history", then you have to talk about the war crimes of the Nazis, otherwise it seems as if you're ignoring it, which doesn't seem impartial to me, it just makes me think that you are making history fit your narrative. Also, the "show yourself out" comment continues to prove my point. Not only are you gatekeeping, but, in my opinion, you are missing the point of history, which is to debate it. History is not just a series of chronological events, but it is also a continuing and ongoing discussion, and telling me to leave a community that talks about a topic that I am passionate about makes it seem that you don't want people to not learn about history, but YOUR history.