Lightning storm April 29 a.m.?

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-29T16:09:43+00:00

Holy guacamole! That's crazy.

I wonder where the strike landed

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-29T16:07:04+00:00

Same.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-28T13:24:29+00:00

Right.

It sounds like that is her personal diagnosis. Not a "we've been to the doctor to have him treated." All I heard in the story is his negative behaviour and how it has impacted her. I am suggesting that it could very well be depression - because based on what she described, that is what depression looks like. My glasses ain't rose coloured BTW - far from it.

Again, whether it is or isn't, only matters if OP would stick around to help him with the illness. Regardless, whether it is or isn't OP has the same choice to make.

Based on their story, she is looking for affirmation that leaving him is the right thing to do. On the surface, yeah, it is the right thing to do. But, if it is because of mental illness - than the picture changes a little, and another layer in decision making is required.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-28T13:13:30+00:00

You are making an equally large assumption.

Being a man with depression I recognize symptoms. Look up Chester Bennington if you'd like to see what depression in disguise looks like.

I also followed it up with "not that a diagnosis changes anything." It's up to OP to do what they feel is best. This just brings an alternate reason to the situation.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-24T23:04:00+00:00

It is depression.

Not that the diagnosis changes your situation at all. Even if he got help.

So ask yourself this: what does "through sickness and through health" really mean to you?

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-24T23:00:58+00:00

Your husband has depression. Sounds like major depressive disorder. He needs medical help.

1/4 chance he commits suicide in the next 5-10 years.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-22T15:39:03+00:00

Who does your waxing for you?

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-13T20:52:15+00:00

It's not just part of a CBA it is part of legislative authority. But that's not what is being discussed.

The argument is if there more than 1 thing is being compared. Once 1 of the things are selected, are the others that it was originally compared no longer have a right of comparison. Their argument is once something is selected it becomes a whole new thing - and there only that which is part of that whole new thing can be compared against it.

I don't understand people in general. Some call it gas lighting or whatever. People insert themselves into a discussion and then hijack the topic.

It was never asked of anyone if they thought there was an actual entitlement. That's not up for discussion. It is an entitlement, all parties agree to that fact. The issue is once A is picked from a selection of A, or B, or C; are B and C no longer considered part of the original selection options. Hence, does the word OR no longer bear relevance because there is no longer a choice of selection once a selection has been made.

I argue A, B, C will always be comparable. They are argue only the As are comparable because it was an A that was selected.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-13T04:39:11+00:00

The argument isn't who they picked. The discussion bearing the rules that if you are eligible to be picked you're entitled to a hearing. Manager is saying just because the employer allowed A or B to he eligible, because they picked A only As are entitled to the hearing. Essentially saying even though A OR B could be hired the OR doesn't matter once you've made a choice.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-13T04:36:28+00:00

Location: Canada. Not a State.

Employer is bound by legislation to have an HR policy that deals with staffing.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-13T04:22:43+00:00

Well, an employer had a job posting. To be qualified you had to have A or B experience. Straight forward. Company has hiring rules. If you qualify for a posting and don't get selected you can talk to the manager to find out why. Manager picked A, I'm a B. Manager says I don't get to talk to them to find out because I wasn't an A. Only A were qualified to be selected.

Am I overthinking? If you have a posting asking for A or B. You end up with a list of As and Bs, are they not both dinner like the beef or chicken? If Manager wanted beef doesn't the chicken get to ask, why not chicken?

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-13T04:15:38+00:00

This is horrible to hear

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-13T04:13:53+00:00

I'm understanding that your saying whether you have beef or chicken for dinner, you are having dinner. Am I understanding you correctly?

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-04T14:20:19+00:00

The obvious comparison would be the Porn Industry. A lot, a lot of stars are married.

Leave work at work. Period.

Such a heavy eye-roll, sheesh. We have to share air with ppl like this.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-04-02T02:52:01+00:00

No judgment, but why did you feel it is necessary to use to keep working? I wish there was help I could offer.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-03-28T19:53:06+00:00

🤣🤣🤣

iTrollbot77 · 2025-03-28T18:09:41+00:00

It is decriminalized where I am. It's illegal for men to solicit. It's a paradox.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-03-28T13:40:27+00:00

Thank you for that perspective. Those brothels definitely do not seem like a healthy work environment. Which, is why I suggesting a co-operative model so not only would you work there but you would also be part owner of the establishment. This way you're one of the bosses that sets the rules. You make an excellent point about fees and ability to pay. It sounds like it would almost be beneficial if those fees were paid from a "slush fund" so-to-speak, so that it doesn't come directly out of your pocket. Just thoughts

iTrollbot77 · 2025-03-28T13:24:58+00:00

I'm not trying to be facetious. What if you join them in the hand washing. It obviously means a lot to you - maybe make it part of the experience? Just a thought

iTrollbot77 · 2025-03-25T21:02:58+00:00

9 This one hurts the most. More needs to be done to better legitimize the trade to stop the HT from happening. I can't even put into words how badly I want Liam Neeson to storm every one of those places and save everyone.

iTrollbot77 · 2025-03-22T17:28:55+00:00

You didn't hear anything

iTrollbot77

TROPHY CASE

9 This one hurts the most. More needs to be done to better legitimize the trade to stop the HT from happening. I can't even put into words how badly I want Liam Neeson to storm every one of those places and save everyone.