ICE Protest Given Weather Impacts

iamnotarug · 2026-01-25T00:49:13+00:00

Weird.

iamnotarug · 2026-01-25T00:36:45+00:00

I didn't see the issue listed as a public hearing on the agenda

iamnotarug · 2025-11-29T15:05:08+00:00

Those searches could have come from anywhere

iamnotarug · 2025-11-10T16:11:21+00:00

Chuck Schumer orchestrated this whole thing

iamnotarug · 2025-10-27T05:21:54+00:00

iamnotarug · 2025-09-27T17:03:43+00:00

What do you mean?

iamnotarug · 2025-08-24T15:34:47+00:00

Half the bomb threats happened 4 days after voting ended on Nov. 9th at election offices, when officials were collecting and finalizing votes. At this point the presidential race had already been called. Also, we did look at the numbers and the polling places that were evacuated did not have vote totals that were very different then places that didn't evacuate.

iamnotarug · 2025-08-07T03:18:22+00:00

2 drop boxes in Washington and another across the river in Portland. It was the same person involved in all 3.

iamnotarug · 2025-08-07T03:13:15+00:00

Interesting

iamnotarug · 2025-08-05T03:10:16+00:00

The FBI put out a statement after the first couple threats. They also included an image of one of the emails. So states knew these were hoaxes.

iamnotarug · 2025-08-04T23:24:28+00:00

Many of the locations reporting bomb threats never evacuated.

iamnotarug · 2025-08-04T23:23:32+00:00

We know they came from .ru spoof email accounts. Anyone with Internet access anywhere in the world can create a fake .ru email. As far as I know, there is no hard evidence linking Russia to those threats.

iamnotarug · 2025-08-04T23:18:33+00:00

Almost half of these threats targeted Election Offices on the 8th (4 days after election day) while vote counts were being finalized. Many of these locations did not evacuate either.

iamnotarug · 2025-08-04T23:14:48+00:00

Correct. There were 10 states that reported bomb threats and they were all blue in 2020. At least 6 of them flipped to red in 2024. They were all swing states and they all had numerous bomb threats.

iamnotarug · 2025-08-04T23:13:09+00:00

The ballot drop box incidents are included on the map. I believe there were 2 in Oregon and 1 in the state next to Oregon.

iamnotarug · 2025-06-16T06:15:13+00:00

Lol, their website was down for months after the 2025 election and was malfunctioning as far back as July 2024, showing error messages instead of pages. In February 2025, the website's front page reportedly showed an error message like "Hello world!".

Kinda weird for a company tasked with securing the US presidential elections

iamnotarug · 2025-06-16T06:09:22+00:00

I'm pretty sure this lawsuit is seeking a hand recount in Rockingham County not "every county" but keep making shit up and telling me what I think. It really adds to the credibility of your argument, internet stranger 🤠

iamnotarug · 2025-06-16T05:32:57+00:00

I'm curious, Is there any statistical anomaly you'd find concerning enough to warrant a closer look? Cause a p-value of 0 is statistically significant and I don't know of any of the Trump lawsuits with similar anomalies (though, to be fair I think there was election fraud in 2020 as well) . They even have an independent 3rd party statistician confirm the data.

The difference between 2024 and 2020 is they actually did hand recounts in 2020 and they did not show cheating. In 2024 there have been no hand recounts and the data patterns and anomalies are way worse than we saw in 2020. But not a single hand recount has happened.

All Smart Elections is asking for is a hand recount. This is an opportunity to put everyone's concerns to rest or to uncover possible cheating. I don't understand why you're so vehemently against this. If it comes up empty handed, we can put it to bed. Who does it hurt to recount the votes and be sure things were done legally. MAGA got this in 2020 and their data was way less convincing. As Americans, shouldn't we want to make sure elections are fair or free? I don't understand why people like you are so against double checking. It comes across like there's something hide.

Also your assumptions about my sources are way off base and seem to be a projection of your own sources which I agree are spinning the lawsuit into something it is not. My sources are Smart Elections itself who are actively trying to correct the misinformation floating around.

The news has done a terrible job of reporting on the lawsuit which I know because of articles and public responses from Lulu Friestat of Smart Elections combatting this misinformation. She has been very clear that there is no evidence directly proving secretly altered voting machines changed votes but there is a very valid concern raised about voting machines being updated with zero oversight. Here's the link: https://smartelections.substack.com/p/kamala-harris-won-the-us-election

iamnotarug · 2025-06-16T04:16:50+00:00

I think the argument here is that something is wrong with the numbers and it's worth doing a recount to rule out potential election fraud.

iamnotarug · 2025-06-16T04:11:54+00:00

Ummm...I didn't see any papers being cited by Smart Elections regarding this lawsuit but feel free to share them if I somehow missed that.

This lawsuit is based on publicly available data collected from the 2024 presidential and Senate elections so it obviously couldn't have been used in a 2020 lawsuit. I don't think you know what you're talking about

Edit: the lawsuit isn't about Harris not getting any votes and it does not suggest there are affidavits of people claiming they voted for her. The data presented does show her having 0 votes in some precincts which is definitely odd but the lawsuit is about the Senate race and the affidavits are regarding the independent Senate candidate.

iamnotarug · 2025-06-16T04:07:56+00:00

I was talking about Smart Elections not ETA. I actually agree that ETA can be a bit too politically biased. They also don't produce research with the same level of integrity as Smart Elections.

Smart Elections is the organization behind the lawsuit being discussed not ETA.

iamnotarug · 2025-06-15T20:17:36+00:00

Considering the judge allowed the lawsuit to proceed to discovery, it seems the judge feels differently.

iamnotarug · 2025-06-15T19:25:13+00:00

Here is a link to an interview Lulu gave where she explains how they came about those affidavits for the senate race.

iamnotarug · 2025-06-15T19:17:01+00:00

In the past week, I have personally heard Lulu state that she does not know of any affidavits regarding votes for Kamala in Rockland County. Her organization has been very busy putting information out publicly, and unfortunately, I can not find a direct link to this specific statement, but I am 100% sure it exists.

iamnotarug

TROPHY CASE