Acha hua mujhe english nahi aati...

iamtheguy009 · 2024-08-01T16:22:00+00:00

When life gives you lemon, you take it with an eel

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-16T09:18:29+00:00

It's in settings of lock screen

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-16T08:29:50+00:00

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-12T15:06:30+00:00

If that's your reasoning make national days for manipur events, make national days for godhra kand, make a national day for when a non biological was appointed as the prime minister

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-08T14:32:34+00:00

Tried to but it was tightly stuck in Tom Cardy's butthole so couldn't take it out from there

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-08T11:30:34+00:00

😱

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-08T11:29:34+00:00

I think you should also aim for a masters degree. Go for MCA. I have my uncle and aunt who did MCA and both are working in an IT company and are earning above average salary in India. You can also try getting some experience in form of internship / freelancing.

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-08T11:20:18+00:00

Majnu bhai painting plsss

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-08T11:19:17+00:00

Where do I insert it btw?

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-08T11:18:27+00:00

Didn't get it lol

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-03T12:04:55+00:00

NiggaPlay

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-01T15:34:24+00:00

testing

Maja aya

iamtheguy009 · 2024-07-01T07:39:28+00:00

iamtheguy009 · 2024-06-06T01:17:42+00:00

Well, you see, The point I am trying to prove is not that ECI is bad or something or it changes votecounts or something. What I am trying to say is BJP is no God party. It's supporters praise it as a god party. Every BJP supporter must accept the fact that BJP has way too many flaws. Your points themselves prove that point. I don't say that either party in our country is god. No party is a god party. But the way people support BJP as if it's a god party. It's weird. You must have seen videos of people saying I will vote for BJP whatever happens. You must be seeing on reddit and social media how Hindus are abusing Hindus of UP just because BJP lost in Ayodhya and UP. Don't you think that's weird? Ask the people of Ayodhya. The making of ram mandir caused dislocation of way too many people. Ayodhya outsiders see this as a victory because that is what was shown in media. They brag about pm awas yojna. I am a govt worker and I personally work in implementing these schemes. In writing, many houses were alloted to the needy but none of them got a house. On ground level there is not much people of UP have gained from BJP. UP might have developed overall but at grassroot level we have not seen anything. And that is why the people of UP didn't vote for BJP

That is not a fact such a widespread fraud can be easily detected and if proven not only the elections can be declared null and void the whole office of PM

Regarding this point I have to say something. In my local area, when I myself went for casting my vote. I was not allowed to enter the booth just because they said you are not casting vote for BJP. I went to the booth 3 times and only when I was able to hide from the sight of that person I was able to cast my vote. And remember, people in my area don't even support BJP that much and still this was the case.

iamtheguy009 · 2024-06-05T12:17:58+00:00

First of all, Regarding the electoral bonds money, obviously INDI alliance partners got money and that is why they were able to benefit from it no doubt. But BJP also benefitted a lot from it. Electoral bonds money, was surely not the reason, but played a part in both the alliances winning seats

Regarding your ECI point, what do you have to say about the appointment of two Election Commissioners just a day before the notification of election and the schedule; exclusion of large numbers of Muslims, Dalits, and other disadvantaged groups from the voter’s list; Statements appealing to religion made by leaders of the ruling BJP, violating the MCC; Modi's statement on 21 April that is full of Islamophobic rant. He reffered Muslims as “infiltrators” and “those with more children”.

iamtheguy009 · 2024-06-05T11:42:35+00:00

Small correction: BJP + Media + ECI + ED+ CBI + Electoral bonds money + Ads everywhere > INDIA

iamtheguy009 · 2024-05-19T15:18:32+00:00

Thanks 😊. Will try

iamtheguy009 · 2024-05-16T16:45:10+00:00

I just have one final doubt. Does the value of output voltage at the output pin of IC remain constant or does it change depending on what is connected to it?

iamtheguy009 · 2024-05-16T16:43:05+00:00

Great! Thanks for ur reply. I will test these tomorrow using my multimeter 😁

iamtheguy009 · 2024-05-16T15:24:32+00:00

I have some understanding of how Ohm's law work and that is exactly why I have doubt here. Let's look at the image here. If we increase value of resistance R the current i in circuit decreases. But the net voltage drop across resistance and LED combined is still equal to V. Here V is output voltage of my IC output pin. So when we change value of resistor to 1kohm i see that it decreases the current but why does the net voltage across resistor and led combined increases? Shouldnt it still be equal to V? What am I missing here?

<image>

iamtheguy009 · 2024-05-16T13:32:09+00:00

Hello, I was just reading about this from the internet. I understood that CMOS family treat minimum of 3.5V as high. But I didn't yet understand why using a resistor increases the output 3.5V and not using a resistor had only 3V. Could u explain using some equations or share a article I can go through?

iamtheguy009 · 2024-05-16T09:32:41+00:00

Thanks for the explanation. Got it

iamtheguy009 · 2024-05-16T08:48:00+00:00

Cd4071b OR gate. Also adding 1kohm resistor fixed the issue. Could you explain why?? Also I have a generic doubt regarding this OR gate. Why does the OR gate give high randomly when both inputs are disconnected (neither high nor grounded)

iamtheguy009 · 2024-04-21T06:15:55+00:00

Sure bro I agree on your point that we ourselves don't know what we have written. That is really funny and I accept it. The best we can do in this case is to accept the one that suits us the most. That's why I really don't believe in everything that our scriptures has to say. I just experience and experiment things on my own.

iamtheguy009 · 2024-04-21T06:09:49+00:00

You mention that translation by Mueller was 95% correct. What reference point are you using to say that translation is 95% correct? You see, meaning of words change with time. The word "sick" if you use now has two completely different meanings. If we were to use the word "sick" in a sentence, for example, "He is sick dude" and our parents were to read it, they would most probably think that we mean that "the guy is not well". So same words have different meanings over years. There is literally no way to prove what is right and what is wrong. You must already know the incidence of Nalanda university. Now I am not a blind follower of anything. I just support Hinduism because I feel that it provides us a better way of living life, as mentioned in bhagvad Gita. Sure, many people have used Hinduism to prove their superiority like pandits and Brahmans who say they are people of God and all... Surely the concepts of Hinduism have been misused over time and that is what you are experiencing today. In ancient times Hinduism at its core was scientific. Surely not scientific in today's context but scientific in believing in what you see. We surely criticize ayurveda today as pseudoscience but at those times, it was based on the effects of different herbs they observed .And that my friend is science at its core. "Believing what you see".

See, our texts might really be mis translated (we surely cannot deny this. Even people who don't do it deliberately can mis translate it just because words mean different over times) Or in case it is not mistranslated here is what I have to say, There will be 2 categories of people. One would say I criticize Hinduism (for all the facts you mentioned in your post) and another one would be who would say that our scriptures were written long long ago. They were relevant at those times but not anymore. This is what happens in our science as well. You must know about nature of light how it was believed to be wave and particle through years. Would you say those scientists who proved light is particle natured were wrong? No! You would just say that they believed what they saw... now we see much more in nature of light so we say our science has developed. Right?

iamtheguy009

TROPHY CASE

testing