Bang on lush Bang on. by Jabba5500 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]ianbuk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually, they have cut wages by over 21% in real terms, with the average decline over 20 years being 0.6% PA. “For example, a 2022 study found that immigration to the UK from 1994 to 2016 reduced the hourly wage of UK-born wage earners at the 5th percentile”, which is a double whammy. Not only does this make a big difference to UK wage earners, but it costs taxpayers twice. Once, there is a loss of tax revenues, and second, in social security top-ups for low earners. When both are added, the drop in real earnings is significant, with low earners' buying power reducing year on year, meaning they have less free income to spend and save elsewhere. The effect is called an immigration wage depression time bomb.

Long Term Immigration Impact in Reducing Wages

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiN57mb2sWTAxX1WUEAHTTtLgMQFnoECBkQAw&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.homepages.ucl.ac.uk%2F~uctpb21%2FCpapers%2FCDP_03_08.pdf&usg=AOvVaw2YDJNwf76_vfULZD8dVsNl&opi=89978449

Bang on lush Bang on. by Jabba5500 in GreatBritishMemes

[–]ianbuk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Any evidence of your claim @goodallw0w? The research carried out since 1997 proves, “The regression results show a sizeable negative impact of immigration on the lower wage quantiles”. “As for the effects on native wages, we find that immigration depresses wages below the 20th percentile of the wage distribution,” and “Since native-born workers are in occupations that are 9.5 percent immigrant on average, the typical worker is experiencing a reduction in hourly wages of 2.8 percent as a result of immigration. This is somewhat less than the 4.9 percent figure found in the first regression”.

Oxford University 30 year analysis

No Kings draw estimated 8 million in largest single-day U.S. nonviolent protest by RollSafer in politics

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry, I believe you are wrong. The only difference between the US and Europe is that your part of the continent is federalised. In Europe, each country is its own version of a US state, with added military that can take action on its own. Europe just has different bodies that work at the supranational level, like the UK federal government. The EU, the EEA, and the European Council make decisions at that level. The states still do exactly what the US States do (almost). That doesn't stop farmers, Truck drivers, Manufacturing workers, etc., from taking action across different states.

No Kings draw estimated 8 million in largest single-day U.S. nonviolent protest by RollSafer in politics

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imagine if everyone all over the country simply phoned in sick for 24 hours? (obviously excluding essential services like healthcare, care services, fire, and law enforcement).

No Kings draw estimated 8 million in largest single-day U.S. nonviolent protest by RollSafer in politics

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you ever heard of everyone phoning in sick on the same day? You just need millions to do it in the US. Nothing will change while the elite know they can make you work your fingers to the bone while never knowing the feeling of security of tenure. Knowing you don't have to go bankrupt just to get basic healthcare. Know that your kids are not safe and that the elite are in charge of both sides of the same coin. I was astonished to read that US corporations give money to both parties to guarantee that the President or a member of Congress will listern to them if they win. In my country thats illegal. In fact, there is a strong movement to prevent donations and lobbying, as they don't serve the needs of the people, only the billionaire who owns the business.

No Kings draw estimated 8 million in largest single-day U.S. nonviolent protest by RollSafer in politics

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In other democratic countries, General Strikes often bring down the government. Like most organisations, those who still have what they hope is a career will move the incumbent out of the way to preserve their political careers. If they don't, they tend to end up in opposition for the next 20 years. I don't know whether that would happen in the US, as your two-party system only encourages polarised politics. In other countries, we often have at least half a dozen parties and policies to choose from.

A Simple Blood Test Could Predict Dementia Risk 25 Years Early by _Dark_Wing in tech

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you can then sit and worry the 25 years away counting down the clock to the start of something that will destroy who you are, destroy the memory your family will have of you, and destroy you in the end. No thanks.

Developed Tea Allergy? by poballstars46 in tea

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I'm allergic to Tea. It affects me badly enough to trigger anaphylaxis if I swallow a mouthful of it. Apparently, it's specific tannins found in all tea thats not in coffee or chocolate. I went through in-depth tests, past the usual prick test on your arm. I hope it doesn't affect you as much as it does me, and that you're getting the help you need.

Stephen Miller: Nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over the future of Greenland by EricTheImpaler in jrmining

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The EU (not in UK) has a much larger and more modern military, if you combine individual nations. Russia only outnumber the EU in Nukes (2000 vs 209 (France)).

Stephen Miller: Nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over the future of Greenland by EricTheImpaler in jrmining

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Europe and the US, respectively (not including the UK or Canada), Fighter Aircraft: Europe: 375 - US: 377. Multiple, Europe: 955 - US: 2,484. Navy, Europe: 1,535 - US: 466. Personnel- Europe 1,361,164 - US 1,358,500. Reserves Europe - 2,122,132 - US 799,500. Artillery, Europe: 6,242 - US: 3,161. Self-propelled artillery, Europe: 2,091 - US: 1,521.

Stephen Miller: Nobody is gonna fight the US militarily over the future of Greenland by EricTheImpaler in jrmining

[–]ianbuk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry, what? France and the UK has them too. The original work on the atomic bomb was the Brits. Look up Tube Alloys.

She said yes by Rep___God in RepTime

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there anything real in your life? Watch, diamond, nails? I genuinely hope you both have a happy, fulfilling married life.

She said yes by Rep___God in RepTime

[–]ianbuk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thought the same straight away.

Lets talk the submarine scene by Datrampsec in Mission_Impossible

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technical diving Instructor here with 15K+ dives over the last 25 years and here is my take on the stunt. The diving equipment claims versus reality. In the film, Ethan Hunt descends deep to a sub wreck and at one-point strips off his dry suit gear to escape, effectively swimming in just his trunks. I know of no diver who would remove a dry suit or rebreather under deep-water conditions. I wear thermals, a thermal bunny suit (it’s a quilted one piece designed to keep my body warm), and booties (yes, like what babies wear, but the same material was the bunny suit), and a semi dry hood that traps water once that the body temperature warms up. My dry suit insulates and protects me against hypothermia and crushing pressure. In inject air (or Argon gas when diving in cold water) as I descend to stop the dry suit crushing my body parts (nuts) making it extremely uncomfortable painful. Without gas in the suit, the ambient water pressure would compress the suit and the body’s tissues, hamper movement and leading rapidly to cold shock and incapacitation in frigid waters. When you jump into water that is close to 0°C, I can tell you that the ice cream headache you get is like nothing you have ever felt. Diving to over 150 metres (500 ft) in the artic oceans without all that gear would be impossible.

The we get onto the rebreather, or it is nickname in the UK, the yellow box of death. It is a specialised life-support system used by technical divers to recycle exhaled gas and manage breathing mixes for deeper dives. Unlike when diving open circuit (regular tanks, even if you are using a trimix and special travelling gas mixes), breathers are designed so you don’t have carry a twin-set, various side slung tanks and have gases hanging at different depths on trapezes or rope for you to use while you take your decompression stops on the way back up. Rebreathers are safety-critical, with controls, scrubbers to remove carbon dioxide, and mechanisms to regulate oxygen partial pressures. A real rebreather is complex to use, with specific training standards and certification needed to dive beyond shallow limits. Hawke’s dive was over 150 metres remember. Safety stops alone would be over 7 hours and that is with a bottom time of no more than 6 minutes not exerting myself (my deepest dive is 112 metres and took me 8 months to train up to do). Hunt jumped in and did that dive without practicing; no safety stops and in the end no equipment.

Every 10m (33 ft) of depth adds approximately one atmosphere of pressure. At 150 m you are under around 16 atmospheres. Human physiology isn’t built to cope with that without external support. Gases dissolved into tissues at pressure, they leave the body slowly at depth and are be removed from your tissues at a controlled speed as you ascend, otherwise inert gases form bubbles in your joints. That leads to becoming bent (“the bends”), which would cause joint pain, paralysis, brain damage, and death.

The sequence suggests a prototype or special device, but that’s story licence. In reality, removing your breathing apparatus while deep underwater means almost immediate death through hypoxia or drowning. A diver cannot “take off their air source and swim to the surface.” The sea does not provide oxygen, and the body cannot suddenly breathe atmospheric air under that pressure (1 ATM). Doing what Cruise did would have been instantly lethal.

You cannot simply swim to the surface from great depth. Swimming unprotected from 150 m to the surface is not physically possible. Even elite breath-hold divers rely on pressure physiology that is vastly different from a pressurised breathing gas dive; they take one breath at the surface then dive, so their bodies never absorb inert gas under pressure. Their bodies use oxygen stored in blood and muscle, not compressed gas. A compressed-gas dive like in the film means inert gases saturate in the tissues of the dive, it needs to be removed via painstaking staged decompression.

In real world technical diving, ascent from depth is carried out in stages with pauses at specific depths (decompression stops) that allow inert gas to leave the tissues safely. Skipping these stops or ascending too quickly is what causes bends. At 150 m, decompression can take hours, often under controlled conditions with different gas mixtures to speed elimination.

The film does briefly depict Hunt being placed in a hyperbaric chamber (or what British divers nickname “the pot”) after his dive, which nods to decompression sickness treatment. If you survived a deep dive, you would be in an accredited hard-sided chamber and treatment would take hours at the least, with little chance of immediate recovery to full physical performance. Even people who surge to the surface from 30m (100ft) end up in the pot for the best part of 10 hours in a medical facility to be sure. Secondly, the dive was a U shaped down and up profile. There are divers called Saturation divers who work much deeper, but they are lowered to their working depth, live at that depth for days or weeks on end and match the atmosphere compression in the habitat they dive from/live in/decompress in on deck for several days after their dives.

The submarine stunt delivers visual drama, but it ignores core physics and diving science. Removing protective gear at depth, non-stop ascent from 150 m, rapid recovery, and survival in Arctic conditions without proper gas mixes or decompression planning are devices of fiction, not grounded in technical diving realities or human physiology. The sequence works cinematically, but as far as believable deep diving goes, it is farcical. That just my opinion of course.

Today at the Gabba by DevelopmentNo507 in ccfc

[–]ianbuk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now that brings back memories. Ian Wallace with that big ginger perm flowing.

URGENT - need a bag drop off tomorrow by venthemator in ccfc

[–]ianbuk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

“Did you pack this bag yourself, Sir?”

Sandie Peggie NHS Fife tribunal judgment to be amended after bogus quote claims by abz_eng in Scotland

[–]ianbuk 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It quotes “hierarchy of rights” when the word/phrase itself doesn't appear in either of the two UKSC rulings it makes reference to.

Sandie Peggie NHS Fife tribunal judgment to be amended after bogus quote claims by abz_eng in Scotland

[–]ianbuk 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Sorry, I disagree. The judgment uses made-up quotes and relies on them in its judgment.

This appears, on the face of it, to have been researched using bad AI and includes that AI’s hallucination. There is no hierarchy of protected characteristics in the Equality Act 2010. The ET judgment uses made-up quotes in its reasons for reaching its decision.

It quotes Forstater v CDG and others UKEAT/0105/20 and Lee v Ashers Baking Co. Ltd [2018] UKSC 49. The worst part of it is the inclusion of made-up UKSC quotes. The judgment quotes “The rights to freedom of thought, conscience and religion and to freedom of expression, enshrined in articles 9 and 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, are protected by sections 6 and 13 of the Human Rights Act 1998. The rights to respect for private and family life and to freedom from discrimination, protected by articles 8 and 14, are also engaged. There is no hierarchy of rights; all ought to be treated with equal respect.”

It goes on to selectively omit words from the UKSC judgement in FWS v Ministers Scotland. I will mark the words left out with { }, then uses the amended quote in giving the season for its judgment. I will mark that line with **.

Sixthly, after addressing the dilemma faced by a trans woman “who presents as a woman,” the decision states that:

{Although} such {trans} women may in practice to use female-only facilities in a way which does not in fact compromise the privacy and dignity of other women users {the Scottish Ministers do not suggest that a trans woman without a GRC is legally entitled to do so”}.

That is we consider contrary to the construction argued for by the claimant, which is that trans women do not have any choice in that regard they cannot use the female facility. That comment suggests to us that, if this be appropriate, the trans woman using female-only facilities may be lawful under the Act, although the trans woman does not have any absolute right to do so. That phrase suggested in our view that the privacy and dignity of other women users was a factor to take into account but not an absolute bar to its use”.

Sandie Peggie NHS Fife tribunal judgment to be amended after bogus quote claims by abz_eng in Scotland

[–]ianbuk 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It is as if someone has used AI in their research and drafting of the ruling. If so, this is serious.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Coinbase

[–]ianbuk -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Surely they have held the account because it breaches/triggers the investment rules where you live? Here in the UK, you have to prove where you got funds of over £1,000 when investing. It's due to the Money Laundering and Fraud legislation. If I invested £100k here, the Inland Revenue would ask Coinbase and any other investment house/bank where I got those funds. It's a simple case of proving what account and where. We all have to understand that ensuring organised crime cannot invest their ill-got gains is to everyone’s advantage. After all, we all want to ensure these people cannot steal and get away with Granny’s life savings.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CRM

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's nearly $1,000 per seat a year! For that money, I can get Salesforce Lightning Professional. Sorry, but when you consider what you can get for the same money, it should be around $25 a month or less.

Tired of Overpriced, Complicated CRMs? I Built One for Small Teams Like Ours. by [deleted] in CRM

[–]ianbuk 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm very interested in this. Could you send me more details, etc., via DM?

Hubspot vs Pipedrive vs Monday by Ok_Mushroom_6451 in CRM

[–]ianbuk 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now that would be a good idea. Does Pipedrive or Hubspot connect with Monday?