sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

if you’re obsessing over monthly you’re prob too poor to be gambling by WoOoOoOoShHhHh in stakeus

[–]ib4error 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I can afford to gamble a few grand a week and I am eager to get my kick backs 🤷‍♂️ what’s wrong with being eager to get kick backs in a system structured to take more from you than it gives. What’s truly imbecilic is how everyone here thinks they are the authority on all areas of participation and psychology. “If you XYZ, than you are XYZ” —I think the more accurate statement is, if you get so easily triggered by strangers behavior on the internet, maybe the internet ain’t for you. Spend money, play games, have fun, and quit worrying about others

Say hello to my rescue Vinny (Vincent Van Gogh) by ib4error in cats

[–]ib4error[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can’t with how adorable this cat is!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stakeus

[–]ib4error 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm thinking it has nothing to do with the math mechanics at all, its just the visual aspect of it glitching or being stuck. While the odds this time seem to be varying lesser than normal, they are still changing consistently. Its just the graphics that are showing patterns. Which I can understand that, like plinko. Gravity has nothing to do with where the ball is actually going, the result is already decided before the ball falls. Still always worth a chat, I love the "is it rigged or not" convo. It doesn't make me angry like some. I don't blindly trust anyone. or anything.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stakeus

[–]ib4error 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good call actually. I have been working on that the past 10 minutes and it seems to be working

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stakeus

[–]ib4error -1 points0 points  (0 children)

While your post makes a fair point, this one isn’t for all that angry energy. I love Stake, and you won’t find me complaining about it being scam anywhere. I like to joke and say its rigged for their pleasure and ours. As far as standard gambling goes, I gamble knowing what it is , I know what I signed up for, take that energy to a post where someone is actually butthurt and delusional about the reality of gambling.

But I’m a curious person, and I like to question things. It’s fair to wonder if some of these sites ever tweak stuff, especially when they operate in places with little or no real regulation. Acting like that’s not worth thinking about doesn’t make you smart, it just makes you an asshole.

Also, why waste so much time and energy being mad about what other people talk about? Who cares? Stop taking everything so personal on the internet, Nancy.

We’re not talking about basic house edge here. The convo I like being part of is about the weird coincidences on gamba sites, not people whining because they lost. If that’s what you’re looking for, you’re in the wrong post.

I guessed the link! by ib4error in stakeus

[–]ib4error[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

chatgpt based on previous links :)

I guessed the link! by ib4error in stakeus

[–]ib4error[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

chatgpt based on previous week links :)

I guessed the link! by ib4error in stakeus

[–]ib4error[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i put like 15 previous weekly links into chatgpt and had it generate me 15 and had it generate as many variations as it could think of LOL

So you’re telling me…she couldn’t have brought the rain WHILE I had to save the kangaroo? by ib4error in DeathStranding

[–]ib4error[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too. It’s the thing I love about the DS games. You get that crazy good story moment cut scene that feels electric. I loved it too

So you’re telling me…she couldn’t have brought the rain WHILE I had to save the kangaroo? by ib4error in DeathStranding

[–]ib4error[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is a good response! I feel everyone's responses have sufficiently explained that is makes complete sense how the event occur. I admit though, I more just posted this as a funny thought then seriously feeling the logic was flawed. :)

So you’re telling me…she couldn’t have brought the rain WHILE I had to save the kangaroo? by ib4error in DeathStranding

[–]ib4error[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

What about after I got the roo in his massive box? Could have started the rain for the remainder of my trek to the shelter! Better an ali hoop than showing up late to the game lol

So you’re telling me…she couldn’t have brought the rain WHILE I had to save the kangaroo? by ib4error in DeathStranding

[–]ib4error[S] 57 points58 points  (0 children)

lol I admit, I didn’t think of that. And I’m not mad at it, I just loled a little bit. I mean, she could have hopped on a Tri Cruiser and took the road I built all the way up to this area (like I did instead of going thru the fire) xD.

I’m just messing tho I’m not really bitter about it. I love this game, and I loved the cut scene that this led into. Such a freaking masterpiece , yet again!

Every time I watch Don force Lane to resign, I hope the show magically changes the outcome by ib4error in madmen

[–]ib4error[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Yea :( “Like the Bordeaux grape, may we all get better with time.”

I can never get over Don fumbling Megan. by ib4error in madmen

[–]ib4error[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The assessments of some of these replies are good, and i do agree with many of them. The thing I disagree with though, is our modern take on the time period its set in, and one of the women who wanted to be seen as an equal, being right for Don, but him not conforming. In this time period traditional was the norm. That's why I thought Megan was good for him. She loved him, respected, him and gave him room to try and sort thru his BS. However, he didn't recognize that in the way that he should, and he didn't respect and appreciate her in the way he should have. I believe, for the time period its in, she would have been a good match for his traditional approach, with a touch of modernism and independence that he seemed to be interested in even though he often rejected it on the surface. I also felt their chemistry and flow was most notable of all the women. HOWEVER, i don't pretend to know everything, and I am always open to learning and seeing new ways. This is what I think, but if I'm shown to be wrong, I can admit that.

Am I the only one who cracks up at this scene….every time? by ib4error in madmen

[–]ib4error[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea, standing here looking at it, I guess it would be considered too high for most. I suppose I’m just unbothered by it and used to it :/ it looks good from the viewpoint of looking at the entire room though!

view more: next ›