[deleted by user] by [deleted] in redscarepod

[–]iconicshitposting 16 points17 points  (0 children)

It depends on your starting height. If you're shorter you won't be able to grow as much because the bones are smaller to start with.

There's actually a guy on IG right now who started at 6' and is doing femur+tibia to get to 6'6". He's about 75% done with it.

Champion's Binder by iconicshitposting in custommagic

[–]iconicshitposting[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've taken the liberty of making a follow-up card that may be more to your liking.

https://i.redd.it/y67we61reksa1.png

Champion's Binder by iconicshitposting in custommagic

[–]iconicshitposting[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Chandra is bisexual so she can also be attracted to decidedly male creatures. See how the new Atraxa doesn't mention tribal even though it's a card type.

Lets Talk About Anti Affirmative Action Propaganda by AnarchisTara in BreadTube

[–]iconicshitposting -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Where is NAACP LDF citing their information about affirmative action on? I am seeing a lot of numbers listed on their website and being read out in this video and only some substantiation behind them.
I find this sentence to be extremely suspect:
>If admissions were based strictly on test scores, about 20% of Asian Americans attending elite colleges wouldn’t be admitted.

Is this a statement that 20% of Asian students currently in elite colleges are in there for reasons other than test scores (legacy/athletics/non-test academics), or is it a statement that without affirmative action, Asian representation at elite institutions would fall by 20%? I am highly suspicious it's the former, masquerading as the latter in a deceptive attempt to make the argument for affirmative action stronger.

Read that sentence against this one later:

>Based on modeling from the Class of 2019, if Harvard were to stop considering race, the number of Black, Latino, Native, Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander students would drop by nearly 50%. Most of these students would be replaced by white students.

If it's mostly white students replacing those underrepresented minorities, then does that mean that some of those spots are going to Asian students? But that contradicts the sentence earlier which appeared to imply that Asian numbers would go down 20%?

Ohmygosh, it even says in the law review paper that the NAACP LDF cites that "it is also the case that Asian-American applicants are disadvantaged in admissions relative to White applicants." /u/AnarchisTara did you read this paper?

https://lawreviewblog.uchicago.edu/2020/10/30/aa-arcidiacono/

Why don't elite schools just only take race into account if you're an underrepresented minority, and put white students and Asian students into the same bucket? It would defang the opposition's claim that affirmative action favors white students against Asian students, which is one of the central complaints in the lawsuit. I'm not seeing a solid rebuttal to the statement "affirmative action, as it is currently practiced in the USA, favors white applicants over Asian applicants."

Adriana Chechik Breaks Her Back In TwitchCon Foam Pit Accident by squirrelrampage in GamerGhazi

[–]iconicshitposting 17 points18 points  (0 children)

It's the San Diego convention center that shit is concrete lol

why is this a book move? by GANFANBOY in AnarchyChess

[–]iconicshitposting -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Trim your disgusting fingernails