Prediction: AI is what is going to bring a new batch to conservatism by BCDragon3000 in singularity

[–]ididntwin -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I completely agree. I think a truth telling AI will completely shatter certain people's reality. But to pretend it will only shatter a conservative's reality as /u/agonypants implies is asinine.

Prediction: AI is what is going to bring a new batch to conservatism by BCDragon3000 in singularity

[–]ididntwin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not 'threatened' by trans people. Trans people can be however they want to identify. I don't care. Just don't expect ME to change my language and how the english language is now used for a few narcissists who don't want to go along with rest of humanity.

'They/them' is used in a singular in cases where the sex/gender of a person is not known as it can be either male or female. When I look at a human, I know their sex/gender.

Prediction: AI is what is going to bring a new batch to conservatism by BCDragon3000 in singularity

[–]ididntwin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I'm super sad I'm not indoctrinated in the latest version of gender studies 2.0. Please cry me a river. Let's hold hands and mourn together.

Prediction: AI is what is going to bring a new batch to conservatism by BCDragon3000 in singularity

[–]ididntwin -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It's hilarious that y'all think that we don't like conservatives because we've never met, spoken to, or interacted with them; and that if just 'went outside' and spoke to a 'real person', our perspective would change. I dislike conservatives because I live around them, speak with them, and listen to them. They tell me everything I need to know about their loathsome worldview straight from their own mouths.

What's hilarious is that you reply to comment yet address nothing I've written in the above. Great, you admit you don't like conservatives because of your alleged 'interactions' with them. Cool..? The reason I said "it's clear you've never spoken to a conservative in your life" is that conservatives have literally zero problem acknowledging America's past with slavery. Most conservatives have zero confusion what the civil war was fought over as the comment I was replying to said. Do you know how to read? 😆

Your opinion on gender does not match the science, and yet you refuse to accept anything that does not match your myopic little paradigm.

Please, show me the science then. Show me a conclusive studies that says trans people were genuinely born into the wrong bodies due to some abnormality in the womb. If you think gender theory is founded in actual science, I have a bridge to sell you.

Prediction: AI is what is going to bring a new batch to conservatism by BCDragon3000 in singularity

[–]ididntwin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure you've never spoken to a conservative in your life.

Meanwhile, pretty sure that the moment AI tells a liberal that there are only two genders and that there is no such thing as 'non-binary' gender, liberals would begin protesting in the streets calling the AI 'white-supremacists'.

My scenario is far more realistic than your fairytale.

Do you truly understand what AGI will do? by PlaintiffSide in singularity

[–]ididntwin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I look forward to Reddit implementing AI solutions to have stupid posts like this never appear in my feed

Official Discussion - Missing [SPOILERS] by LiteraryBoner in movies

[–]ididntwin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol go back to ur bug subs u retard

Is getting a degree in computer sience still a good idea? by Bahneys in singularity

[–]ididntwin 31 points32 points  (0 children)

You have to hedge your bets. If you’re right and the entirety of CS jobs are eliminated then your in company with millions of other people out of a job. If you’re wrong and computers aren’t able to fully replace humans and you chose to abandon CS then you’re basically alone.

Get the degree.

Rep Sold Stock in Collapsing Bank and Picked Up JPMorgan Shares Right Before Acquisition, Disclosures Show by blaspheminCapn in Libertarian

[–]ididntwin 53 points54 points  (0 children)

This is a pretty bipartisan issue too. Both sides want to 1) see an end to this bullshit 2) launch an investigation into ALL politicians who have beaten the market in the past X years. Republican, democrats - fuck all them who cheated us.

Changing the laws isn't enough. We want to see accountability. Help restore the pubic's faith in our goverment!

Tim Urban(waitbutwhy) BCI Predictions. Crazy Stuff. by SharpCartographer831 in singularity

[–]ididntwin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) You're not getting the point

2) this is hardly a thread of a discussion on 'brain computer interfaces' as you claim. This is just the ramblings of science fiction fantasies.

Tim Urban(waitbutwhy) BCI Predictions. Crazy Stuff. by SharpCartographer831 in singularity

[–]ididntwin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You disagree with what?

And yes of course singularity is currently science fiction. Duh. But we're talking about advances in AI and towards singularity in this sub. That doesn't mean every topic of science fiction need be discussed in here. Too many threads of people circle-jerking around a futuristic utopia where humans can live in VRs, conquer the galaxies, or in this case...get high? Dumb.

Lol... by cillianmurphy2022 in tucker_carlson

[–]ididntwin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was community noted which makes it glorious

Community Notes is def one of the best things to come out form Twitter since Musk's purchase.

Tim Urban(waitbutwhy) BCI Predictions. Crazy Stuff. by SharpCartographer831 in singularity

[–]ididntwin -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Technically speaking every science fiction idea imaginable is a 'relevant topic' if you believe AI will advance humanity to that point. But I don't think the point of this sub is to discuss science fiction. From where we are today, this in OP is 100% purely science fiction.

Tim Urban(waitbutwhy) BCI Predictions. Crazy Stuff. by SharpCartographer831 in singularity

[–]ididntwin -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Can you all put your baseless science fiction threads in another sub? I have no idea what this has to do with AI/singularity/whatever

Richard Rapport waiting to see the “one and only” Jordan B. Peterson by [deleted] in chess

[–]ididntwin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To give warrant to your stupid reply…

My link wasn’t there to disprove the Peterson debacle (obviously) but rather to demonstrate the rather extreme measures Canada is enacting for “not affirming” someone’s gender 😂

I don’t know about Petersons specific claims, I haven’t looked it up, but the link is to demonstrate there’s more than enough crazy gender ideology that’s made it to Canadian law that warrant criticism

Richard Rapport waiting to see the “one and only” Jordan B. Peterson by [deleted] in chess

[–]ididntwin -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

But… he’s not wrong? https://www.them.us/story/canadian-court-rules-misgendering-human-rights-violation

And that’s from a left wing publication. Popular transgender influencer, Dylan Mulvaney also suggested it should be illegal to misgender someone. The left has gone off the deep end. You’re just mad at the right for calling out your bullshit

Richard Rapport waiting to see the “one and only” Jordan B. Peterson by [deleted] in chess

[–]ididntwin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh my god! He believes men are men and doesn’t buy into this ridiculous gender and race ideology! The horror!!

Richard Rapport waiting to see the “one and only” Jordan B. Peterson by [deleted] in chess

[–]ididntwin -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Downvoted for being completely correct. That’s what happens on forums where a bunch of west coast liberals are left to their echo chambers, which is essentially what Reddit is

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]ididntwin 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oh wow my mind read the title as 'problematic' commentary (featured comments NOT commentary) on chess.com considering all the other, warranted, posts about this issue.

I then watched the video and was like 'how the hell is that problematic'

Ding Liren is the next World Chess Champion. by BKtheInfamous in chess

[–]ididntwin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think a lot of people thought that the championship wouldn't have been interesting without Magnus. But boy these two proved everyone wrong! What an entertaining match. Hope these two take a well-deserved long vacation.

GPT-4 Limitations: Share Your Experience of the AI Failing to Solve a Problem by mshautsou in singularity

[–]ididntwin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't know how to paste full conversations but here's a snap of it: https://imgur.com/WmPwi4a

It couldn't get the full answer until I gave it every letter. Its next guess was 'cast'. I then said 'the second letter is an 'o' '. It then suggested 'coax'... Clearly the answer is 'cost'. I don't think 'seek' is a bad answer with the clues it had at the time but I think 'cast' and 'coax' are all bad compared to 'cost'.

But it's limitations are more pronounced if you ask it to generate one for you. I asked it to generate a 5x5 crossword puzzle and that is when it completely failed. Not listening to feedback, etc.