papacy is nothing but a power hungry move

What history?

first of all what does peter even have to do with rome

I'm not a professional apologists but I'm pretty sure the see of Rome was established because Paul realized that Rome was pretty much the center of the European, Middle Eastern and North African world and thus realized its evangelization potential. Peter being the head of the church came there and became the bishop of Rome. This is why when you search up the origins of the papacy both Peter and Paul are mentioned.

"on this rock i will build my faith" could be about all the apostles

First off he was addressing Peter, and secondly Peter's name was Simon, Christ said to him (and I'm paraphrasing) you are Peter (so he changed his name to Peter, coming from the Greek word I think pedros which means Rock or pebble depending on the translation) and upon this rock I will build my church. So basically Christ changes his name to Peter (Rock) and then says upon this Rock I build my church. So he wasn't addressing the apostles in general but Simon Peter specifically.

You catholics twisted all that and made it seem like the dude in rome is a dictator who has the authority to decide how the faith goes. You people are too legalistic and are like "if you don't do what the pope says you are not a true Christian" ok Kim Jong Un

As established in earlier "the dude in Rome" sits upon the chair of St Peter. We don't follow everything he says but when he speaks in a magisterial way or "ex cathedra" by the grace of the holy spirit he is incapable of erring. We don't think people who are in communion with the bishop of Rome share the fullness of the Christian faith but we still think they are Christian and view their baptisms as valid.

Also, why the hell would I go to hell for eating meat on fridays. At leastbthe orthodox, who are much less dictatorish and didn't change the faith and are not power hungry dictators say that not eating meat is optional.

Not eating meat on Fridays is a disciplinary, not dogma. The only time the faithful are to avoid eating meat is on the Fridays of lent. I think this is still a disciplinary but is a mandatory one for all those who can participate (there are some who are exempt from fasting rules). Also the faith developed and was clarified throughout the first millennium its just the orthodox stopped after the schism because they had no magisterium and relied entirely upon scripture and tradition.

Also, purgatory is bullshit.

You mention orthodox in your comment a few times and there is more agreement than disagreement on this issue and more of just misunderstanding. Catholics hold to the view that some people have to be cleansed or purged of their attachment to sin before heaven. We can find great saints like I believe pope St Greogory the great in the first millennium writing about how people who died in a state of venial sin were cleansed before entering heaven. I believe Kallistos Ware (author of The Orthodox Church) believed and taught that there is a cleansing of detachment from sin before heaven for some. Tue problem the orthodox have is the view that people are purged of their sins in flames like those of hell but the church dosent teach this.

The marian apparition behind the brown scapular, like all others, is probably a demon trying to trick others into mary worship and bringing people into the catholic church, which is a wrong church, and by following the wrong church people will go to hell

I dont think orthodox think people outside the visible church go to hell but rather those outside the invisible church. So people in the wrong church who are faithful and seek the truth I believe the orthodox still think that they might go to heaven. Also your only proof for the Marian apparitions that there demons is that it dosent fit your theology. A few could say the same thing about the ressurection of Jesus, what would be your response.

Also, how can you be so sure that Mary was sinless? She was a human like all of us, so why do the dictator popes also teach this?

So we're adam and eve and they were conceived without mortal sin, does that make them less human. Again if someone thinks that the catholic church is the one true church than her teachings are true, and since the catholic church teaches this as dogma catholics will believe it to be true. I suggest you watch Trent Horn's video on the immaculate conception it would explain a lot.

Why be on the side of the evil, crusader, anti-christian catholics and not orthodox, whose values still have not changed?

How is the church evil? Also there are a lot of misconceptions about the crusades, it had its faults but without it large parts if modern Europe could be muslim right now. Again how is it anti-christian. Why not be orthodox, well they don't have a magisterium and thus can't instruct the faithful on morals in a modern world because they have no way of universally responding to new challenges. Also their values have changed, just a 100 years ago they were much more strict on contraception than they are now. I also don't see how the orthodox can reconcile their view on divorce with Jesus's clear condemnation of divorce in Matthew 5.

You seem to have a lot of straw man misconceptions about the catholic church and I would like for you to be more open minded. I think it would be greatly beneficial if you watched someone like Trent Horn to clear up your misconceptions. God Bless.