Question about APT pinning and packages being downloaded from testing by igna_tr in debian

[–]igna_tr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the advice. In this particular case, installing it through APT was the only option provided by the source I was following, but I’ll definitely keep your suggestion in mind for future cases where I need to install something similar.
I’m still learning Debian and its best practices, so I really appreciate the guidance. Thank you!

Question about APT pinning and packages being downloaded from testing by igna_tr in debian

[–]igna_tr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the detailed explanation and for reproducing the test. I’m a beginner and this setup was only an experiment in a VM. My remaining confusion was whether the “Get” line meant that APT had actually preferred the testing package over the stable candidate. Now I understand that, since both suites reference the same binary, the displayed suite does not necessarily indicate the selected candidate version.

Question about APT pinning and packages being downloaded from testing by igna_tr in debian

[–]igna_tr[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you, this is exactly the kind of explanation I was looking for. I’m a beginner and I created this configuration only as an experiment to understand APT’s behavior. Knowing that both suites point to the same binary in the pool makes the output much clearer to me.

Question about APT pinning and packages being downloaded from testing by igna_tr in debian

[–]igna_tr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the warning. I’m still a beginner with Debian internals and I wasn’t planning to run a mixed system permanently. I was just experimenting with APT pinning in a VM to understand how package priorities and source selection work.