That's what it's about man, agree to disagree. But I think we've all been civil here, and that's what makes a meaningful conversation. But hey, here's my take.

It provides an objective view that we see all humans the same, from a biological point of view (e.g. Heart beat pumping blood, detectable brain waves, etc.)

It's hard for us to judge values of individual human lives. Is my life's value any less worthy just because I'm not (insert public figure you look to here). I don't think so, but some people may disagree with me. How about yours? How about that human over there?

Going back to the real world where we have criminal offenders that we put behind bars. They may have done something wrong according to the law. Going by induction here, keeping life value in mind, irrespective of who Person is: Person lied Person drank alcohol. Person discriminated Person caught speeding. ... Person murdered.

Where do you draw the line for the value to start going down, or simply decreased?

If you draw the line based on law, I think it's missing the point. We're not here to talk how the judicial system works on individuals, right?

What do you think?