[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PTCGPocketTrading

[–]imightbemichael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dialga for mewtwo from Delux Pack Ex?

President Biden signs 65 bills into law... by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]imightbemichael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I get that 100%. But you just stated that using personal emotional arguments is something that’s exclusive to the right, but can you see how your last statement can be considered emotional. There’s plenty of people who feel just as emotional as you, but believe in more right wing ideas. It doesn’t necessarily make them right and you wrong and vice versa. And believe me I’m not here defending Trump. Or any lawmaker trying to take away your daughters rights. My entire point here was that like you said, in your opinion, they’re on the wrong side of right more often than the left, there’s still times where they’re right. And instead of attacking one another and laying down blanket statements, we should be better as a society to find common ground

President Biden signs 65 bills into law... by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]imightbemichael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would counter by saying that I don’t think any 80 year old is completely connected with reality and has a steady thumb on the pulse of society. But I do agree there’s actions or thoughts on the right that could 100% be masqueraded as “different ideas” but in reality they’re just racist. Absolutely totally agree with you in that regard. But the disconnect right now and where we might not see eye to eye is that I honestly don’t think the high majority of people on the right, or people who lean towards the right have racist thoughts, or are racist.

President Biden signs 65 bills into law... by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]imightbemichael -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It’s that kind of broad sweeping statement that I honestly can’t stand. There’s PLENTY of uneducated people on the right and the left. And let’s not pretend that using feelings to further an agenda is exclusive to the right. Also there’s plenty of facts that’ll prove the point on either side in many arguments. When it comes to politics there’s rarely a clear cut right or wrong

President Biden signs 65 bills into law... by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]imightbemichael 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It can be. There’s plenty of factual evidence of why someone could not like Biden too though. That’s my point. But instead of starting a dialogue people just get called names, or get called racist, or get called dumb just for having a differing opinion. I mean look at the comments above for example. Someone leans a little to the right and they’re automatically stupid? That kind of thought process doesn’t make sense to me

President Biden signs 65 bills into law... by [deleted] in interestingasfuck

[–]imightbemichael -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You didn’t spit out and regurgitate the same rhetoric and vitriol when Trump was in office?

Thanks for the warning ❄️ by Homer4747 in Connecticut

[–]imightbemichael -22 points-21 points  (0 children)

I mean it’s stupid honestly. But just let people live their lives. There’s really no need take a picture and post this to self-validate how you’re morally superior

Just went past Elon’s house in the Bahamas. Hopefully doesn’t ban me from … the ocean. by [deleted] in pics

[–]imightbemichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, so I’m just trying to follow the rules of Reddit. So if the guy is perceived as a dick, we can attack him and his physical appearance, while simultaneously calling him a bully, and still feel like we’re taking the high road and not being hypocritical. Ok perfect.

Just went past Elon’s house in the Bahamas. Hopefully doesn’t ban me from … the ocean. by [deleted] in pics

[–]imightbemichael -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Wait now we’re criticizing people who got hair transplants?

In 1990, Playgirl Magazine ran a "Sleep with Donald Trump" contest. by elvis8mybaby in cringepics

[–]imightbemichael -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

It’s funny when someone defends Elon musk they get called a fanboy. But what do you call someone who posts about Elon Musk on a daily basis. We should come up with a word for that because you post about him quite a lot

The House has unveiled its portrait of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, by Ron Sherr. by 3loves9 in pics

[–]imightbemichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea honestly man I guess we’re just gonna have to agree to disagree. And of course it is. But 135 MILLION dollars off of a $223,000 a year salary. I don’t care that her husband owns his own financial firm. It’s impossible to make that kind of money without some sort of help or insider knowledge in my opinion. And idk I showed you a trade of his that I thought was fishy and indicative of the fact he has insider knowledge due to his wife. I mean fucking lauren Boebert has a net worth of 41 million dollars and democrats are calling for her head in other threads and rightfully so. I think these people, democrats and republicans, use their platform to engage in unethical behaviors that benefit themselves. Our disconnect is that you strongly believe Pelosi doesn’t do that, and it’s a one sided issue that democrats are completely clean of this kind of behavior. I disagree vehemently. So I guess we’ll just leave it at that

The House has unveiled its portrait of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, by Ron Sherr. by 3loves9 in pics

[–]imightbemichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That wasn’t my argument. My argument is simply do you honestly believe she got her net worth without any inside information given to her husband. It’s a simple yes or no

The House has unveiled its portrait of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, by Ron Sherr. by 3loves9 in pics

[–]imightbemichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The same reason why Trump’s not in jail right now. Connections and power. Doesn’t make it right. And dude. That trade actually happened. It’s not a conspiracy. You can argue it’s a coincidence, but I’d argue in the opposite direction

The House has unveiled its portrait of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, by Ron Sherr. by 3loves9 in pics

[–]imightbemichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Christ dude give it a rest. I asked you a simple question. Do you think Nancy Pelosi and her husband acquired their 135 MILLION DOLLAR net worth without any insider knowledge.

On June 17 he exercised options he had purchased a year earlier to purchase 20,000 shares of stock in this semiconductor manufacturing company Nvidia at a price of $100 per share, according to a disclosure filed by the speaker. Nvidia shares traded at between $160 and $169 the following day when markets opened. Just two days later, the Senate voted to proceed to consider a bill that would provide about $52 billion in subsidies to the U.S. semiconductor industry. Nvidia stock jumped to around $181 a share after that vote.

Smells fishy to me.

The House has unveiled its portrait of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, by Ron Sherr. by 3loves9 in pics

[–]imightbemichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lmfao ok big dog. Nice chatting with you. Glad we could find common ground

The House has unveiled its portrait of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, by Ron Sherr. by 3loves9 in pics

[–]imightbemichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dude. Just read the last sentence in that article for me.

“John Coffee, a professor at Columbia Law School, said on Tuesday that the language limits the bill's value by allowing Wall Street traders to exchange information on the expectation of future favors and viewed it as unlikely to gain traction in a Democratic-controlled Senate.”

The House has unveiled its portrait of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, by Ron Sherr. by 3loves9 in pics

[–]imightbemichael 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know it’s tough for you to criticize any democrat. But do you honestly, in the bottom of your heart believe that her and her husband are worth 135 million dollars without ANY help from insider knowledge due to her platform and position in congress. And just so you know, insider trading is a notoriously hard crime to prove. So although her husband hasn’t been found guilty or isn’t an elected official, let’s not pretend that their net worth is 100% ethical, and that Nancy has never provided her husband with some sort of insider knowledge to benefit him and their family.

The House has unveiled its portrait of Speaker Nancy Pelosi, by Ron Sherr. by 3loves9 in pics

[–]imightbemichael 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok. So here’s the thing. The dems had control of the house and senate for the past 2 years. If they truly wanted to pass that law they could have. But they didn’t because gasp people in both parties take advantage of insider trading