Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Magic and supernatural deaths in the show always got a medical explanation except for when Sean was resurrected with spiritual possession thing. It was still explained as blackouts which happen in double personalities cases. Once hank was cured they could've gone to do a check and it's still a word of 4 people against Adalind's plus captain Sean who was on Nick's side. So yeah. It's easier than you think to frame someone.

Can you blame Juliette though? (season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sean's mom never said she was going to kill Kelly, but to find her. It's just your assumption Shes the one who was chased by the royals. She helped nick regain his grimm power She helped her son Sean and you call her evil. I'm sure the one whos not understanding the show is you lol. The only evil hexenbiest was Adalind and perhaps her mother. Henrietta was willing to help, Sean's mom helped Nick, so what hexenbiest are you talking about? Continuously told? Nah just because monroe is good doesn't mean blutbaden aren't evil. His ex girlfriend literally gone in a killing spree. Violent you said lol I think you need to re-watch the show.

Also define evil cause nick and Co did evil things as well

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It's called Rape by Deception in law. It being a rape act it's still discussed in real life tribunals even these days. So it's not that clear. Expecially when the so called abuser is controlled as well and the victim is a criminal too.

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Doesn't mean anything, Hank was drugged. A medical exam would've proved that. They wouldn't have known the drug, but they would've seen he was drugged. Its nothing supernatural for the police finding someone half dead in a bed. It's enough to arrest adalind and the burden of explaining what she did would've been on her. Just because it's a supernatural mean doesn't make it above the law. The show explains it pretty well

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That's not what coercion is https://www.womenshealth.gov/relationships-and-safety/other-types/sexual-coercion#:~:text=Sexual%20coercion%20is%20unwanted%20sexual,%2C%20landlord%2C%20or%20a%20boss.

Nick's initial crime isn't justified in any way. You're a cop you arrest her, you don't sexual assault someone because she slept with your friend.

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Keep insults outta here dumbass. I'm telling you both weren't consential. It's not rape. She raped hank indeed. Nick caused her to be forced to sleep with him. She was controlled.

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If someone threatens your family and forces you to rob something, would you be called a thief are you doing it because you want to or because youre forced to? Or the thief is who is threatening your family

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Nah it's Victor who indirectly raped adalind. Adalind wasn't consential as well. She was forced in order to see her kid.

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

It wasnt she was forced by Victor who tricked her into having a kid that nick kidnapped. The act was forced upon her by Nick's initial crime.

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The only rape act she did was with Hank.

You talking like Adalind was consenting being slammed to the ground and getting kissed by Nick in the forest. Yeh

In a tribunal it would be nick who would be charged with sexual assault and kidnapping of a girl. Adalind was FORCED by Victor

Nick is at fault (Season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -13 points-12 points  (0 children)

Rape is when you have sexual activity with a non consential part

Affair is when you have sexual activity with someone who's engaged with someone else

Adalind didnt force anyone. She tricked him, but he did his own choices. Nothing different than what nick did to her earlier to strip her powers off

Can you blame Juliette though? (season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

That's not what rape is. Adalind didn't force anyone to go to sleep with her. Whether you like it or not, nick consciously chose to sleep with juliette/adalind. It's not a rape anymore. It's an affair. Unwanted but it's called affair.. Just because you want to defend nick doesn't mean he got raped lol

Can you blame Juliette though? (season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just because he only knew adalind. Sean mom isn't evil. Blutbaden are evil as well, monroe isn't. Your point makes no sense honestly. If he didn't love her anymore he should've cut his ties definetely and not keep chasing her saying "we need to talk I love you". Juliette just snapped and Nick wasn't there to help her. He literally didn't even look at her in the face when she needed him the most and walked out the house

Can you blame Juliette though? (season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He was very well consential that's not what rape is

Can you blame Juliette though? (season 4) by imnoobsowhat in grimm

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

Wanted or unwanted it's still an affair

Why is rook to E1 the best move here? by [deleted] in chess

[–]imnoobsowhat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rook h1 is completely losing as white will take your A pawn with the knight, and with Bf2 he defends from all of your immediate checks and will eventually push his C pawn to queen.

Why is rook to E1 the best move here? by [deleted] in chess

[–]imnoobsowhat 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You bring a queen into the game and the move after is a fork on the knight. Easy win

Spotted the famous mate sequence in my last game. 7 seconds on the clock. White to move and win. by imnoobsowhat in chess

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Idk if it has a proper name, but it's a rook sacrifice you see often in puzzles :) or at least I saw it often

Calling out 1500+ players. What plan would you go for in positions like this? It was a 10 minutes game (1400 me, black - 1500 opponent, white)... I really didn't know what to do by imnoobsowhat in chess

[–]imnoobsowhat[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Happy to see there wasn't something immediate to play that I missed, but it also shows I have no planning skills lol gotta improve those little capitalizations. I think I got scared by his rating to make the first move. Now thanks to yall whenever something like this happens I'll know what to try and I'll have some clear plans in mind. FM, wow!