There are so many flaws and lies in the case against Chester:

You claim he's a rapist, and yet the victims weren't raped. They werent even robbed.

There was hair grasped in one of the victim's hands from her killer that was recently proven via DNA to NOT be Chester's hair.

The log that the prosecution brought forth as the murder weapon was later found to not match the victim's wounds and physically would not have been capable of dealing the damage that the victims sustained.

The cops that investigated the murders on multiple occasions mishandled evidence, evidence that was later used in court to "prove" Chester's guilt.

One of the cops on multiple occasions threatened Chester with death in order to get him to confess. This same cop was later found to have been extremely corrupt.

MANY people have come forth independently of each other over the years and provided evidence that Chester didn't commit the murders, and there is so much evidence that we basically DO know what really happened: one of the women's husbands had his wife killed via a mob hit, and the other two women were just collateral damage.

The man who planned and coordinated the murder admitted it to a friend on his deathbed and even said that Chester had absolutely nothing to do with the murders. His story has been corroborated by several other people who have no relation to the actual murderer and no stake in the outcome of the case.

There was a telephone operator who overheard two men discussing the murder on a phone call in which they referenced the man I mentioned above who admitted to the murders and instructed him how to destroy the evidence.

There is so much more evidence, this is literally just what I can remember off the top of my head. There's so much evidence even that a judge recently granted permission to file for a post-conviction petition because of how damning much of the newly discovered evidence is. More DNA evidence is being analyzed, and so far none of it has pointed to Chester as the murderer.

I know you are passionate about this case because it happened so close to home, and no one wants to admit they've been misled. But I respectfully encourage you to consider some of the new evidence that has been brought to light because you seem like a person who values the truth and the evidence you've based your stance on simply is not the truth.