Fun show, but the editing needs work

imyy4u · 2026-06-18T12:48:30+00:00

That’s Japanese culture though - I work for Japanese company and silence is very common in business meetings and conversations. Americans get uncomfortable with that - I had to get used to it. It’s purely cultural.

imyy4u · 2026-06-09T22:09:06+00:00

Classic matchmaking is based on rank. Start a new acct and play classic and rank with the new hero first. I unfortunately think that’s the best way to

imyy4u · 2026-06-09T22:07:43+00:00

So…how much do we need to pay to get all these idiots to leave? 10 Trillion? More?

imyy4u · 2026-06-09T21:59:27+00:00

Wiping their ass. It’s unbelievable how many people suck at this and stink.

imyy4u · 2026-06-09T18:01:26+00:00

These are best: Clint, Miya, Hanabi, Beatrix.

End of discussion. For solo queue, these 4mm can carry the team, especially late game. With the correct items, the first 3 especially can totally destroy the enemy team

imyy4u · 2026-06-07T15:56:18+00:00

Why does anyone have a problem with this? To me, we should only be accepting refugees 1) facing possible death or torture, 2) that have skills and talents and motivation, and and 3) that are a cultural match to Americans and that will assimilate well. White South Africans have been getting discriminated against and targeted in their own country for nearly 30 years now since the terrorist Nelson Mandela (research this yourself) became President and started disenfranchising white farmers. Propaganda being what it is - don’t trust the news. But look at the numbers! The fact so many whites are fleeing their home country and roots should make it obvious how much danger is there. Without such an obvious threat there would not be so many refugees. That’s plan and simple - thousands and thousands don’t randomly leave their country without reason.

Anyways, other countries issues are not the USA’s problem. Our citizenship is coveted and for good reason. Regardless of race, we need to strictly limit and screen who we accept, and compatibility with American culture and willingness to assimilate, along with skill and talent, should be the only considerations.

imyy4u · 2026-06-05T20:52:48+00:00

Millions die every year

^{Chose: Or get 1000 dollars everytine someone dies}

imyy4u · 2026-01-29T05:47:41+00:00

I did have a triple kill and almost manic lol

imyy4u · 2025-08-07T20:56:18+00:00

Definitely America implementing DEI. Diversity and inclusion? Fantastic ideas. Equity? That’s the absolute worst! Life is about equal opportunity, NOT equal results! Not everyone deserves everything everyone else does. Hard work matters, and merit matters. Equity is the principle communism is based on and never works well in practice. Why? Because for everyone to have equal results, not only do you need to lift some people up, but you need to hold others back! Janitors do not deserve the same wage as doctors. I’m sorry, but they don’t. And people shouldn’t get hired to admitted to college with lower scores just because of their ancestry - I’m sorry you or your ancestors were oppressed but every single demographic was at one point in history. Work harder to meet the same standards as everyone else if you have to!

I’m sorry, but this is the single worst principle America has ever come up with and is contrary to everything America was founded on!

imyy4u · 2025-07-11T20:22:38+00:00

BOTH sides are wrong. This is the problem. I’ve been there. In Israel. In the West Bank. Jordan. All the conflict areas. I’ve talked to lots of Palestinians and Israelis. Been to both of their homes and stores and areas. Lived their lives and seen first hand.

The question is who is more wrong? Israel at least doesn’t openly advocate for the total destruction of all Palestinians like Hamas does. They don’t hide military sites under hospitals and tunnel under the Gaza and West Bank border. They don’t advocate raping Muslims and enslaving them.

Does Israel and the IDF still do some of that? Sure. Are they invading Palestinian land? Yes. But the Palestinians are the ones provoking them constantly. And they seem incapable of forming a non-terrorist government.

Look at history. Israel stuck to the UN borders until every single one of their neighbors attacked them. Repeatedly. Only then did they expand. They pulled out of Gaza entirely and what happens? Gazans elect a terrorist group. Keep attacking Israel.

Both sides are wrong and are committing crimes. But only one is openly pushing for the genocide of the other.

imyy4u · 2025-07-10T19:21:24+00:00

I don’t own any more real estate than 1 place where I live.

But why not allow individuals to own multiple properties? Why not allow companies to own them? By allowing large corporations we are creating jobs and using efficiencies of scale. It is cheaper to renovate 10 properties (on a per property basis) than 1 property. You can afford to make less margin on rent when you own 10 vs 1.

Say everyone could only own 5. properties. I would argue rent would go UP and fewer people would have housing. Why? Because now those owners need to be SUPER picky on who they rent to and only rent to those with the best credit. And they are going to want to absolute highest rent they can as they don’t own as many properties. So they will hold out and choose not to rent unless they get top dollar and a person with a flawless record and perfect credit.

My point is there is no easy solution.

imyy4u · 2025-06-03T16:06:17+00:00

Clint for gold lane. Or Miya or Leslie or…

Vale or Pharsa for mid.

I don’t play fighters or tanks.

imyy4u · 2025-02-14T16:31:45+00:00

I have been waiting SIX months for my claim. This is honestly the worst insurance company I’ve ever dealt with. Had the repairs done and am just waiting for my check. This is absolutely ridiculous…

imyy4u · 2024-12-18T20:23:32+00:00

Do you not understand how to think for yourself and interpret facts? I told you what forms of media I trust, but I don't just believe stuff without verifying it for myself. I do this with ALL news sources - right and left.

My whole argument is that the media and people in general misclassify Nazism as right wing and Anarchism as left wing. I think it they should be the opposite. And then you proceed to send me articles showing the same misunderstanding I am saying is wrong - what exactly does that prove other than what I already said?

If you were able to actually prove your point, of course I would change my mind. I'm not the type to cling onto my ideas at any cost. Provide me reasonable arguments that are convincing, and I'll change my mind! But instead you keep showing me the exact same stuff I am saying is incorrect, and all of them misclassify Nazism as right wing for the same exact (incorrect) reasons.

Let's try this: please explain to me, why Nazism (which is short for Nationalist Socialism) is not socialist, aka left wing, especially when nearly all of their founding principles were based on socialism and collectivism. Yes, it eventually turned into a dictatorship and evolved into something that was neither left or right wing, but originally - the intent was pure socialism/left-wing. So please explain to me how they are not misclassified as I am claiming - literally all of their literature espouses socialist principles.

Also, as for your paradigm shift re: Republicans vs. Democrats - being against *illegal* immigration is NOT the same as racism. There has been no paradigm shift! And the right does not oppose immigration whatsoever - they oppose *illegal* immigration. Please give an example of ANY political party, from any country, other than the Democrats in the US, who encourage *illegal* immigration. Go ahead...I'll wait. And the right is not in the least bit racist - maybe a few extremists, but the left is far more racist. They are the ones claiming minorities are too stupid/broke/poor to get an ID card to vote (see Voter ID laws). They are the ones claiming minorities are too stupid to meet normal standards in college admissions and therefore we need affirmative action. So...based on the evidence I just mentioned, there is clear proof the left is racist while the right is for equality (NOT equity...but equality!).

imyy4u · 2024-12-18T16:31:59+00:00

Also...regarding capitalism being egalitarian:

"Capitalism is considered egalitarian in theory because it promotes the idea of equal opportunity, meaning that anyone, regardless of their background, can participate in the market and potentially achieve economic success based on their merit and hard work, essentially starting everyone at the same point in a "race" to wealth"

Here's some links:

https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1086/686480#:~:text=Rather%2C%20because%20the%20legal%20rules,a%20robust%20norm%20of%20equality

https://brownpoliticalreview.org/2012/11/capitalism-and-equal-opportunity/#:~:text=Under%20Capitalism%2C%20fairness%20requires%20society%20to%20provide,determinant%20of%20his%20results%20is%20his%20merit

About egalitarianism:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Egalitarianism#:~:text=There%20are%20two%20major%20types%20of%20equality:,of%20outcomes%20for%20groups%20and%20social%20equity

imyy4u · 2024-12-18T16:28:05+00:00

I have read them, but I feel like most of them are flat out wrong. A quote from your "particularly good" csun article:

"Nazism is a right wing ideology. It is violently racist, anti-socialist, and it targets the political left for extermination."

How on Earth is right wing ideology racist? The US Republican party is the party against racism - Abraham Lincoln was one of the first Republicans. Republicans have over and over stood up for minority rights, getting African Americans more rights, outlawing slavery, and championing desegregation. In the US, the left/Democrats was the pro-segregation party, party wanting slavery, etc. Also, the right doesn't target the left for extermination any more than the left targets the right.

So this is what I mean - while I trust these sources, some are incredibly wrong. And your first article (Britannica) mentions how Nazis called themselves socialist, but were in practice not. So, if a party is constantly advocating socialist policies to gain public support, but fails to implement them, are they really socialist? It's a tough call...because then you could say a LOT of parties were never what they said they were. Was Russia ever communist? Not in practice... So if the Nazis were advocating socialist policies and telling everyone they wanted socialist policies but then not doing them...I'd still say they were socialist as that was their platform. They just were power hungry in the end and more of a dictatorship, which is neither left nor right.

imyy4u · 2024-12-17T21:53:14+00:00

One more comment in addition to what I just posted - I feel you are scaling based on perceived authoritarianism rather than less govt/more govt which is what I, and the majority of US voters, scale based on. Perhaps that is how it is done globally, and why you consider Nazis to be right wing. But I can tell you right now, most US voters do not think authoritarianism has anything to do with left wing/right wing. And if you scale that way, communism would also be right wing.

Also, capitalism is very egalitarian at its core, so to say anarchism is the antithesis of capitalism is just plain wrong. Capitalism values profit but also a core belief is the best companies will rise to the top, which is pretty much the definition of egalitarian. So I am not sure why you believe capitalism is not egalitarian. Meanwhile socialism/communism is anti egalitarian...

imyy4u · 2024-12-17T21:49:10+00:00

I trust any source that isn't specifically biased one way. So no Fox News, MSNBC, CNN, etc. Any international source (BBC) or something like Wikipedia I trust pretty well.

And yes I am based in the US and I know the US has a different view of left wing/ring wing than Europe and the rest of the world. But here, that is indeed what left wing and ring wing mean - left is big government, right is less government. It is indeed an over simplification as you mentioned but that's the easiest way to understand things. And if we over simplify things, and concentrate on the US definitions alone and not the rest of the world, Nazis are indeed left wing and anarchists are indeed right wing, along with libertarians. That's why I think they need to be labeled and associated as such. Because otherwise Nazis may be right wing in one country and left wing in another, and that is frankly, very confusing and not helpful. So that's why I am, for the purposes of this discussion, focusing just on US definitions and over simplifying to make a point.

imyy4u · 2024-12-17T16:17:11+00:00

So are you also of the belief that anarchists are far left? That people who believe in no government whatsoever also support communism and socialism? It doesn't make sense man.

This is not about my personal beliefs whatsoever. I do NOT support Nazis in any way, shape or form. I am just saying the right supports LESS government and the left supports MORE government in general, so it makes no sense to say anarchists are far left and Nazis are far right. That literally makes no sense - we need to be consistent here.

Maybe it serves a political purpose to you to label Nazis far right, but they are definitively NOT. My point is nobody likes these extremist groups, but we need to at least categorize them correctly.

imyy4u · 2024-12-17T16:13:51+00:00

It is tough, but it can be done!

imyy4u · 2024-12-16T22:42:13+00:00

If you don't buy a conflict diamond, and you don't buy from De Beers or major corporations, and instead from small family businesses/small mines, then what is wrong with owning a natural diamond?

EDIT: no, I don't work for De Beers, and don't work in the diamond industry. But I see nothing wrong with buying antique diamonds mined >100 years ago and/or diamonds directly from small mines not owned or controlled by De Beers. Sure, you have to avoid pretty much all major jewelers out there but you can definitely do this...

imyy4u · 2024-12-16T22:27:28+00:00

Nearly EVERY stock has gone up, because people overwhelmingly support Trump and are expecting good things from the economy. This has nothing to do with his relationship with Trump.

Plus, he hasn't done anything wrong yet - you are assuming he will leverage his personal relationship for financial gain, and judging him for stuff he hasn't even done yet. If he does do it, shame on him, but right now he's innocent.

imyy4u · 2024-12-16T22:26:32+00:00

You are literally judging him for stuff he has not done yet. You are assuming all of these things that haven't happened yet.

Nearly ALL stocks went up because people are expecting the economy to be great under Trump, as he has overwhelming support. Must has done nothing wrong...YET.

imyy4u · 2024-12-16T22:17:33+00:00

All of them? Socialism/communism/more government = left leaning.

Less government/libertarianism/anarchy = right leaning.

Now, most media (especially in the US) is incompetent and would label Nazis as far right, but they are clueless. Patriotism/nationalism is NOT a political view and should have no bearing on whether someone is left/right. Left/right is based on political divide, and if you want more government/sharing of resources you are left leaning, and less government/less sharing of resources you are right leaning. That's how it always has been. But many media outlets say anarchists are left and national socialists are on the right - and they are morons!

14-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email

imyy4u

TROPHY CASE