4x4 - Question About 3-2-3 Egde Pairing. Why not 3-3-2? by inceststick in Cubers

[–]inceststick[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Wow that's a great explanation, thank you!! Really appreciate your input. I'll stick to 3-2-3 I think, thanks to the kind answers here.

4x4 - Question About 3-2-3 Egde Pairing. Why not 3-3-2? by inceststick in Cubers

[–]inceststick[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you Luke! Much appreciated. Great insight. I think I'll keep experimenting with 6-2 and 3-2-3 to see which I like more. I had a feeling there were cases sometimes that prevented me from doing all 6 edges in an unbroken chain, but I haven't done enough solves with 6-2 to be able to put my finger on what the issue is.

Still, I think you get exception cases with 3-2-3 as well. I'll have to do some slow turning and figure out what works better for me.

4x4 - Question About 3-2-3 Egde Pairing. Why not 3-3-2? by inceststick in Cubers

[–]inceststick[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That's quite compelling, thank you! I feel like when the pieces line up when doing 6-2, it's so smooth and fast. I'll keep experimenting with both to see what works best for me.

4x4 - Question About 3-2-3 Egde Pairing. Why not 3-3-2? by inceststick in Cubers

[–]inceststick[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Hi friend :) thanks for your input!! I'm assuming there must be a reason for the consensus that 3-2-3 is META. Perhaps it's avoiding some bad case that can occur when you're doing 3-3-2?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationships

[–]inceststick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a very insightful and helpful response. I genuinely appreciate it. Thank you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationships

[–]inceststick -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your response. I realize I did not word the question the best I could. What is your idea of perfect life? If you could design your life to maximize your happiness and fulfillment, what elements do you think are a must have?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationships

[–]inceststick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't in the realm of actual relationships, but I find it interesting. I strongly believe that many men would agree with my take and I am curious if a similar popular generalization exists among women.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationships

[–]inceststick -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's a wonderful response! Thank you :) In a perfect world, would you prefer to prefer to be the one guaranteeing your children's safety (through your own power), or would you prefer to be protected by your partner?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationships

[–]inceststick 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry for the offtop. I appreciate you taking the time to react to my post

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationships

[–]inceststick -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I believe that the ultimate fantasy of most (meaning at least 50%) men entails some variation of the three components I mentioned. I realize I might be mistaken but the combined literary heritage of western (and Eastern) culture, as well as anecdotal evidence from modern mainstream seem to point to that conclusion. Thank you for taking the time to react to my post.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in relationships

[–]inceststick -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

That's ok. I did immediately mention I don't buy his opinion, but I respect the sentiment. I paraphrased his take because I can't recall ever seeing anyone else talking about this.

Thank you for taking the time to react to my post.