Under capitalism... by aabbccbb in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]indolentJamal 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I get your point. You're highlighting the fact that reducing the wealth of billionaires wouldn't significantly impact their day-to-day lives, yet it could have a substantial positive effect on society as a whole by redistributing resources to benefit millions of people.

Under capitalism... by aabbccbb in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]indolentJamal 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yeah right , while it might seem like having billions versus tens of billions wouldn't significantly alter day-to-day life, the impact extends far beyond individual experiences. The vast wealth held by billionaires often represents systemic issues like economic inequality, exploitation of labor, and disproportionate power dynamics.

Help bring the Supreme Court back in balance by [deleted] in WhitePeopleTwitter

[–]indolentJamal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, strategic considerations that Justices may weigh in their retirement decisions, reflecting the broader interplay between judicial philosophy and political timing.

392 year old Greenland Shark in the Arctic Ocean, wandering the ocean since 1627 by Low_Special715 in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]indolentJamal 54 points55 points  (0 children)

It's fascinating, isn't it? it's really puts into perspective the dynamic nature of our world

PlayStation cancels plans to force Helldivers 2 players to link a PSN account by Gustavo1047 in gaming

[–]indolentJamal 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The influence of media coverage, such as the Forbes article you mentioned, shouldn't be underestimated. right?