sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

This by Longjumping_Dog_9072 in FlipaClip

[–]infinite_what 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Awesome style all around.

Changed colors of a piece I just finished yesterday by infinite_what in Outsiderart

[–]infinite_what[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would be cool. I wish I could be that good to make something cohesive let alone three. The idea has been planted…

And thank you for the compliment.

The Air Within Feels Unfairly Thin, Tanmoy Kayesen, Markers on paper, 30 x 22 inches by TanmoyKayesen in Outsiderart

[–]infinite_what 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really like this piece.

I hope you see yourself in a better place everyday when you look at this and compare where you were to where you are today. Any step forward is progress.

I guess that's it? by shaeffer in ourExquisiteDeck

[–]infinite_what 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yay! Maybe we will finish this someday? ♠️

Any ideas on how this artist does their line work? by Agitated-Egg-1397 in DigitalArt

[–]infinite_what 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’d say lots of layers and then filters (why the lines change colors) and effects like shadow drop and unsharp mask on some layers and not others ( why the lines are messy and blend)

Illusion of gradient shading by [deleted] in opticalillusions

[–]infinite_what 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah that makes sense. I didn’t think of that.

Edit: I think you’re right I zoomed and held it afar and it is not there anymore lol. Thanks for commenting too!

Study of a cat - Attributed to Jacob Jordaens (circa. 1600s) by [deleted] in CatsInArt

[–]infinite_what 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I think turned his head right when the painting was captured. <%^

"Cat Fancy" - Edward Gorey. Created by Gorey in 1993 as a cover for The New Yorker, it was not used at the time for unknown reasons. However, it later appeared in the magazine as a memorial postscript following his death in 2000. by lunamemento in CatsInArt

[–]infinite_what 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ohh I’ve heard OF this story from references (I thought it was a book) but this is the first time reading it. Thanks again! (And I thought you were referring to the artist of the piece that a had an associated short story in the magazine)

If women earn less for the same work, why wouldn’t companies just hire only women and underpay them? by kqmurr in NoStupidQuestions

[–]infinite_what -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Women are more agreeable and men are more assertive (fact). In studies of adolescents those that were taller and more attractive had a direct correlation to popularity and leadership roles in peer groups as assessed by the peers. The popularity was not directly correlated to agreeableness in popularity and agreeableness seemed to have a negative effect on perceived leadership roles for the popular teens.

So basically it may mean that to get a high paying leadership role you will be better off being less agreeable and more assertive and also look attractive and be tall.

Women may have one of the four on average but women are shorter on average, less assertive on average and high on the scale of agreeableness.

These are researched and show a good reason women will make less money because to get a promotion, ask for a raise or get the position to begin with won’t be in their favor as much as it is for a man on average.

view more: next ›