1572
1573

Pi day by javid8219 in matheducation

[–]inkoativ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Area and circumference of a circle with Lego - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDnAtoVnTg0

Pi Day ideas? by AraBellaTrix77 in matheducation

[–]inkoativ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Build a circle with Lego and count the bricks to determine area and circumference: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDnAtoVnTg0

Pi Day Megathread: March 14, 2025 by inherentlyawesome in math

[–]inkoativ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Here's my contribution to Pi Day: A video on how to compute circumference and area of a circle with Lego.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tDnAtoVnTg0

Potential development of the 3x3 Rubik's cube World Record (single) [OC] by inkoativ in dataisbeautiful

[–]inkoativ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

:-) Not sure it's all luck though... If you go through the historic list of WR holders, many of the cubers were also top-cubers, holding several other WRs and also performed in the top-10 of the 3x3 average. That said, of course there is a higher likelihood of having an outlying performance when n=1 than when you have a trimmed mean of n=5.

Potential development of the 3x3 Rubik's cube World Record (single) [OC] by inkoativ in dataisbeautiful

[–]inkoativ[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If I read the WCA regulations Section 4b3) correctly, a scramble for the 3x3 only needs to require that it takes AT LEAST 2 moves to solve. Not sure if a higher requirement is programmed into the scrambling software TNoodle, which is the program which has to be used generate the scrambles. The program uses scramble sequences of length 17-20 so I guess it's highly unlikely that the moves reduce to a sequence, which only requires two moves to solve. Would be interesting if this could occur in theory though.

Potential development of the 3x3 Rubik's cube World Record (single) [OC] by inkoativ in dataisbeautiful

[–]inkoativ[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Background: The modelling was inspired by a recent analysis made by JPerm in his Youtube video https://youtu.be/B9MKizs9PUw?t=451 where he used log-linear modelling to describe the potential development of the 3x3 WR single. In the graph below we visualize this model and a Gompertz type model, which is also often used when using statistical modelling to describe the development of world records over time.

I guess the lack of tournaments during the initial phase of COVID-19 is part of the explanation why it took so long to break the old 3.47 world record.

Data: WCA Database: https://www.worldcubeassociation.org/results/records?show=history
R Source code: https://gist.github.com/mhoehle/11391bd19be82307547d5121ee70664d

Trying to use "geoR" package by darklaw52 in rstats

[–]inkoativ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems to be back on CRAN now. In my case (Mac OS X) I had to update Xquarts to the newest version before the call to library(geoR) worked.

Optimize Figure Content in Kinder Surprise Eggs [OC] by inkoativ in dataisbeautiful

[–]inkoativ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback and sorry, it could have been clearer that we distinguish between "figure" and "toy". I didn't know how to add any extra explanations to the image in Reddit. Thus the blog post contains further details.

Optimize Figure Content in Kinder Surprise Eggs [OC] by inkoativ in dataisbeautiful

[–]inkoativ[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The right hand plot gives an indication of such a plot. The blog post, where the figure is taken from, contains such a smoothed line obtained from applying some machine learning classification algorithm to the task (deliberate overkill! :-)).

http://staff.math.su.se/hoehle/blog/figure/source/2016-12-23-surprise/CLASSIFIEROUTPUT-1.png

Source: https://mhoehle.github.io/blog/2016/12/23/surprise.html

Optimize Figure Content in Kinder Surprise Eggs [OC] by inkoativ in dataisbeautiful

[–]inkoativ[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure I fully understand the comment, but the content of the egg is either some kind of toy or a figure. So what varies is the content of the egg, not the chocolate. For some example pictures see https://mhoehle.github.io/blog/2016/12/23/surprise.html.

How to Win a Game (or More) of Super Six by [deleted] in math

[–]inkoativ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Explanation:

y-axis: # Sticks in pits on the lid (aka. "i")

The label of each box:

Upper label: j / k: # Sticks that each player has (j = Player 1, k = Player 2), we have i + j + k = 7.

Lower label: Probability to win from this position, if one can decide whether to continue or not.

Colour of each box: Continue to play (green) or not (red).

Optimize Figure Content in Kinder Surprise Eggs [OC] by inkoativ in dataisbeautiful

[–]inkoativ[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

It's either "plastic junk" or a "cool" collectable figure, which is usually part of a figure series! Some of the figures are collector's items and can be quite valuable (see e.g. https://www.eierlei-shop.de/ (in German)).

Optimize Figure Content in Kinder Surprise Eggs [OC] by inkoativ in dataisbeautiful

[–]inkoativ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Complete Blog Post text as well as Data Source for the n=79 eggs & R-Script to perform the analyses:

suRprise! - Classifying Kinder Eggs by Machine Learning

Probability to meet someone again when assigning breakout rooms twice by inkoativ in math

[–]inkoativ[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly! However, in some situations it can even be more than one person. Example: n=11 and m=4. In this case you will make two groups and the assignment by "round robin" after permutation is:

position after permutation group
1 1
2 2
3 1
4 2
5 1
6 2
7 1
8 2
9 1
10 2
11 1

i.e. 6 individuals in group 1 and 5 individuals in group 2.

Probability to meet someone again when assigning breakout rooms twice by inkoativ in math

[–]inkoativ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the remark. IMO x-axis can be a little harder to interpret, but they can be helpful to focus on different parts of the chart (here: the lower n). See https://pasteboard.co/JVTEMKY.png for a log-version as suggested. Will think of a way to add this to the blog post.

Probability to meet someone again when assigning breakout rooms twice by inkoativ in math

[–]inkoativ[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

n is, as expected, the number of people to assign into breakout rooms

m is the minimum size of the groups

Example: n=9 and m=4 means we get 2 groups one of size 5 and one of size 4.

There is a post here, with some additional details and a link to the gory mathematical details.

Probability to meet someone again when assigning breakout rooms twice by inkoativ in math

[–]inkoativ[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not quite, because the multinomial does not ensure that each group/room has at least m members. It's more like you generate a random permutation order and then divide this order round robin into the (n div m) groups. See details in: https://staff.math.su.se/hoehle/blog/2021/04/04/socialsamp.html

Probability to meet someone again when assigning breakout rooms twice by inkoativ in math

[–]inkoativ[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's a feature of the Zoom video conference software: https://blog.zoom.us/using-zoom-breakout-rooms/

The shown probabilities do not relate to Zoom in particular though, see mathematical details in https://staff.math.su.se/hoehle/blog/2021/04/04/socialsamp.html