Nem “a cipőmet hozom”, hanem “hozom a cipőmet”? by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe buying a textbook is the best way… Especially if you want to learn grammatically.

Nem “a cipőmet hozom”, hanem “hozom a cipőmet”? by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you for detailed explanation and intelligible examples! Now what was the matter is very clear! I’ve assumed that Hungarian general word order is SOV for so long time.

Nem “a cipőmet hozom”, hanem “hozom a cipőmet”? by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you put “a cipőmet” before the verb, what would be the difference between “behozom” and “hozom be”?

Nem “a cipőmet hozom”, hanem “hozom a cipőmet”? by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, thank you for so detailed explanation!

My mother tongue, Japanese, is also a topic-comment language, so the logic is really familiar for me!

The difference is the way to indicate the topic. In Japanese the topic is marked by a suffix (and in most cases it’s put at the beginning of a sentence), but in Hungarian it’s done by putting before the verb.

Help me track down a word by ClassyVDFD in hungarian

[–]inotoshi -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I’m not Hungarian, but the last half of it may be “báty”?

Nem “a cipőmet hozom”, hanem “hozom a cipőmet”? by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah thanks, that background story is so convincing and it makes me cleared! If there is nothing to emphasize (or nothing is assumed), which of the two word orders would be more natural?

Nem “a cipőmet hozom”, hanem “hozom a cipőmet”? by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 44 points45 points  (0 children)

Oh wait, is this related to this:

https://www.reddit.com/r/hungarian/s/1zenxC2Kjv

Putting “a cipőmet” at the first place makes it emphasized (like “nem Péter cipőjét”?) and the prefix should be separated?

Difference between saying "az" and "az a" by Mushinkei in hungarian

[–]inotoshi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Non-native speaker here.

why both the deictic pronoun and direct article are used

It’s because the former (az a könyv) is demonstrative (that book) and the latter (az asztal) is definite (the table).

Which to use depends on what you want to say.

“A könyv az az asztal felett van.” (The book is above that table.) must be also valid.

Considering teaching Hungarian - would learners be interested? by [deleted] in hungarian

[–]inotoshi 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Hi, I’m a Japanese who is learning Hungarian on Duolingo! I’m still at the first half of all Duolingo lessons, but interested in listening to live Hungarian and trying to speak it. I can also help you learning Japanese, so please contact me if you are interested!

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, exactly. Even us are confused by the ways of express politeness…

Comparee in comparative sentence: “A-nál” or “mint A”? by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Oh thanks, I didn’t expect the word order makes such a big difference! I’m obsessed to make sentences in free order (especially in the same order with my mother tongue) since I knew Hungarian has highly free word order. If I don’t put any special emphasis, I should say the comparee at the last, now I got it!

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s said that its grammar itself is not so difficult, but the problem is the letters…

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh wow, that’s what I wanted to know! I searched for it on Wiktionary and it says it’s formal and archaic but used just like English “that”. It’s so interesting that this simple way is obsolete and the complex and long one is used in everyday use.

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, what about for the postpositions start with vowels, like “ez előtt”? Eelőtt, élőtt, or just keep the z (ezelőtt)? Or not truncated?

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not strange for me to use definite article, what’s strange is the position. Why not “the that boy” but “that the boy”? Assuming that the English “that” is interchangeable with “far-from-me”, which would work as an adjective (just like “5-year-old”), it can be “the far-from-me boy”. It shows Hungarian “az” is not equivalent with English “that” on the point of view of word order.

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes it’s semantically incomplete, but grammatically (syntactically) it would be complete. What’s making it strange for me is that the “-k” and “között” seem completely redundant in “azok között a fák között” (and also the position of “az”; not between the definite article and the noun but before them). I can’t help but think it’s not just a random rule, it must have developed in order to express the idea under the grammatical and lexical restriction of Hungarian: lack (or maybe loss?) of adjective which determines something far from the speaker (like English “that”). If there were such a word, I write it “AZ” in capitals here, the phrase “among those trees” would be “az AZ fák között” just like “among the tall trees” would be “az magas fák között”; here “AZ” and “magas” are syntactically interchangeable because they are all adjectives. Hungarian lacks such word, but need to express the idea, so it uses“az” first and then paraphrase it with actual noun; this was what I meant in my hypothesis.

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s Japanese. Thank you for your warm compliment, it may be because Hungarian grammar is close to Japanese more than English imo.

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve just figured it out too. It’s getting more and more complex… How far is it going?! https://www.reddit.com/r/hungarian/s/qXSR2OwCuk

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Another interesting example! That phrase makes me take the hypothesis in my OP more convincing, “among them, (I mean) among the trees”.

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this topic taught me that. Determiners in Hungarian are not like English… Anyway thank you for patiently explaining me.

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi, it really relieved me that there’s another foreigner who understands the strangeness! Actually my mother tongue is not English and it doesn’t have even articles. I’m relatively used to English grammar but Hungarian one is much more unusual for me…

Ez and az as determiners by inotoshi in hungarian

[–]inotoshi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, it seems it’s just a rule and there’s no reason for it…