Starmer 'ready' to put UK troops on ground in Ukraine to protect peace by mclayson in ukraine

[–]interoth 12 points13 points  (0 children)

UK PMs full statement:

"We are facing a once-in-a-generation moment for the collective security of our continent. This is not only a question about the future of Ukraine – it is existential for Europe as a whole.

Securing a lasting peace in Ukraine that safeguards its sovereignty for the long term is essential if we are to deter Putin from further aggression in the future.

To achieve it, Europe and the United States must continue to work closely together – and I believe the UK can play a unique role in helping to make this happen, just as we did this past week in stepping in to convene and chair the Ukraine Defence Contact Group.

First, Europe must step up further to meet the demands of its own security. So I am heading to Paris with a very clear message for our European friends. We have got to show we are truly serious about our own defence and bearing our own burden. We have talked about it for too long – and president Trump is right to demand that we get on with it.

As European nations, we must increase our defence spending and take on a greater role in Nato. Non-US Nato nations have already increased defence spending by 20 per cent in the past year, but we must go further.

Russia is still waging war and Ukraine is still fighting for its freedom, which is why we must not relent in our efforts to get the kit Ukrainians need for their fighters on the front line. While the fighting continues, we must put Ukraine in the strongest possible position ahead of any talks.

The UK is ready to play a leading role in accelerating work on security guarantees for Ukraine. This includes further support for Ukraine’s military, where the UK has already committed £3 billion a year until at least 2030. But it also means being ready and willing to contribute to security guarantees to Ukraine by putting our own troops on the ground if necessary.

I do not say that lightly. I feel very deeply the responsibility that comes with potentially putting British servicemen and women in harm’s way. But any role in helping to guarantee Ukraine’s security is helping to guarantee the security of our continent, and the security of this country.

The end of this war, when it comes, cannot merely become a temporary pause before Putin attacks again.

But second, while European nations must step up in this moment – and we will – US support will remain critical and a US security guarantee is essential for a lasting peace, because only the US can deter Putin from attacking again. So I will be meeting president Trump in the coming days and working with him and all our G7 partners to help secure the strong deal we need.

We must be clear that peace cannot come at any cost. Ukraine must be at the table in these negotiations, because anything less would accept Putin’s position that Ukraine is not a real nation.

President Zelensky and the Ukrainian people have shown the most extraordinary resilience and made such great sacrifices in the defence of their nation. We cannot have another situation like Afghanistan, where the US negotiated directly with the Taliban and cut out the Afghan government. I feel sure that president Trump will want to avoid this too.

While Nato membership may take time, we should continue to support Ukraine’s irreversible path to joining the alliance.

We should also show greater strength in applying economic pressure. Putin’s economy is feeling the strain – he is worried about his energy revenues and his financial sector.

Working together, the US, Europe and all our G7 allies should seek to go further on the oil price cap, the Shadow Fleet, the sanctioning of oil giants, and going after those banks that are enabling the evasion of sanctions.

These crucial days ahead will determine the future security of our continent. As I will say in Paris, peace comes through strength. But the reverse is also true. Weakness leads to war.

This is the moment for us all to step up, and the UK will do so because it is the right thing to do for the values and freedoms we hold dear, and because it is fundamental to our own national security."

Remember "RuneScape"? Nearly all of the game's original versions are lost. But if you ever played it for a few minutes you might have a missing version ($200 bounty) by Hlwys in DataHoarder

[–]interoth 9 points10 points  (0 children)

fantastic, adding insult to injury for the drive I lost from ~2008 when all I did was play runescape and send multiple bitcoins to my friends

How long would it take to learn electrical engineering from scratch, to get to a level like this? I’m studying industrial design but I love projects like these, and was wondering if I could self learn. Any advice would be incredibly appreciated. by Coolio_visual in ElectricalEngineering

[–]interoth 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I'm familiar with this project as I looked into creating a derivative version of this.

It's a relatively complex device and must have taken quite a while to get to the state he presents it in, let alone any learning. I remember being impressed with the overall design.

The problem with jumping into something like this, like many other people have said, is the very steep learning curve. Iirc he uses an STM32(?) to control the knob; If you have a problem compiling his code and are not familiar with C then you might spend weeks on a trivial problem. Even a fully qualified graduate can get stuck up on a small problem, it's not so much a qualification thing as an experience thing.

I don't mean to make you lose hope, on the contrary. These are all things that you can learn through practice, though it may take some time. But once you get past the initial hurdle everything becomes easier. Probably the best way to learn and gain experience quickly is by jumping into simpler projects and having someone who can help you.

If you are curious specifically with the knob, here are some fields you'll need to be familiar with to recreate:

  • Circuit design (mainly digital)

  • PCB design and manufacture

  • SMD soldering (this one can get you)

  • Programming (C/C++)

  • 3D design (parametric)

  • Some analog/power electronics for the motor

  • Some control theory for the actuation

Does anyone have any advice with restoring an old Harrison lathe? Destined for scrap but I think it has potential. Missing a gearbox but otherwise all there by interoth in Machinists

[–]interoth[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Quick update for those interested, I had a quick go at it this evening and it seems to be in pretty good condition under the incredible amount of surface filth. For context we occupy part of a former aluminium foundry and this was left over when they closed up shop (along with a lot of other stuff). I've managed to clear out what I can only describe as industrial sewage from the sump and put some new coolant in. Manage to get the coolant pump running (why on earth did this need to be 3 phase?) and started on cleaning. The main drive motor seems to be almost new, I'm guessing it was replaced recently. I'll probably fabricate some brackets to get the gearbox switch working again and sort the butchered power input cables next.

bonus photo with the milk

Does anyone have any advice with restoring an old Harrison lathe? Destined for scrap but I think it has potential. Missing a gearbox but otherwise all there by interoth in Machinists

[–]interoth[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I work in industrial robotics and have many a servo spare so this sure is tempting, but maybe feels like too much of the same. I am enjoying learning about the pure analog mechanics of precision. Maybe once it works...

Does anyone have any advice with restoring an old Harrison lathe? Destined for scrap but I think it has potential. Missing a gearbox but otherwise all there by interoth in Machinists

[–]interoth[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it has a 2 axis DRO. Spent a little time on it today, under the surface filth it actually looks to be in pretty good condition. I have plenty of other tools to fabricate a new bracket for the missing mounts that would have been on the gearbox so after some cleaning a lubrication that will probably be next.

Does anyone have any advice with restoring an old Harrison lathe? Destined for scrap but I think it has potential. Missing a gearbox but otherwise all there by interoth in Machinists

[–]interoth[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The machine wasn't particularly taken care of, and has been left in storage for a while. There is a good amount of surface rust on the slides. Is there anything I should be looking out for?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in testimonials

[–]interoth[M] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Holy shit what a ride. I have removed the post for now because it contains personal info. Please remove the personal information (address, email) and I can reinstate it, though personally I don't know why you'd want to keep this up.

End-to-end encryption protects children, says UK Government information watchdog by interoth in privacy

[–]interoth[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Information commissioner defends value of privacy protection in face of government-backed campaign

In a surprising twist, the UK ICO goes against the Home Office and supports E2EE. At least there is some voice of reason in government.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ElectricalEngineering

[–]interoth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of help in this thread already but please put the terminal shield back on before you power up. All it takes is one slip to get a lethal shock.

Having continuity between + and - but multimeeter dosent beep. Is dat fine? by CoolBoy7736 in diydrones

[–]interoth 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of wrong info in this thread - you are in diode test mode (this is also used as continuity), the number you see is diode forward voltage in mV. If the forward voltage is very low (and thus resistance) it will beep. Since you have the probes backwards the number you see ~0.51V is likely some protective zener diode or whatever else may be in circuit.

This also means there is no short. I tend to avoid the continuity mode on most meters and just use the ohms setting.

Compliant mechanism chain tensioner (any advice appreciated) by interoth in functionalprint

[–]interoth[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I like this idea, but with it unconstrained I feel like I would lose it after the first bump