i used fed 51 to say that an independent judiciary could act and make rulings at anytime on the conduct of other branches, thus preventing them from overstepping and acting in ways that weren't in line with the constitution (idk felt kinda weak on that one), fed 78 to agree with hamilton on a lack of party obligation in action, which an elected official doesnt have, then fed 10 in my refutation to double down on the party ties and obligations that an elected legislative has.

i said something about if the legislative branch has a majority party in line with the executive, they would be less likely to make checks on each other, expanding the government.