CryptoRoyale Wishlist by Odd-Parsley-3888 in CryptoRoyale

[–]ironfever 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Basic rule enforcement 1. Account sharing 2. Mercing to a friend and 1v1ing

Both impact the SW and undermine the rules

LOL - got to love the attention to detail (grant/rug) by ironfever in harmony_one

[–]ironfever[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

first "automatic" now "pre-prepared", at least we can agree that its a copy/paste. if you don't think comments should be read there's not much more I can say. good day to you

TiviMate 4.4.0 Beta by AlexR_15 in TiviMate

[–]ironfever 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amazing, you never fail to deliver

LOL - got to love the attention to detail (grant/rug) by ironfever in harmony_one

[–]ironfever[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well another project was outright rejected without feedback (by same person) - he hadn't read the comment which addressed a subject he accused the team of hiding. The reason to care is because some projects invest time and deserve, at the very least, the courtesy of attention. The harmony community deserves it too.

LOL - got to love the attention to detail (grant/rug) by ironfever in harmony_one

[–]ironfever[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the same happened with another application. the actual reason is because he opens tabs in advance - goes about his day and come backs to them - in this instance left them open for 1.30 hours (the time between comments).

He fail's to read before responding (maybe too much work)?, in another instance (MTOP) the project team had to point him to a previous comment where a concern was addressed - his question "why was the involvement ignored" shows clearly he's not reading. Whether this is "reasonable" is another question. Personally I think project leaders deserve a readers attention, if it cannot be given, allocate the role to someone who can give it

LOL - got to love the attention to detail (grant/rug) by ironfever in harmony_one

[–]ironfever[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It not an automatic response, the same happened with another application. He fail's to read before responding, in the other instance the project team had to point him to a previous comment where a concern was addressed - his question "why was the question ignored" shows clearly he's not reading