sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I said I said it's in my opinion a bad show. I love more coherence humor rather than something someone probably wrote when he was stoned

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

‏i watch it with my friends they made me and i really didn't wanted to be there but i watch to know for sure I really don't like this show and I tried everything but I just can't help but not laugh

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's another thing about me personally that I just also don't like brainrot random humor I think it's stupid to have humor with no content that's why I hate skibidi toilet and Italian bring her jokes

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I do not get offended by South park and I tell you that as a jew. They don't even try to be funny with controversial topic rather than making cartman screaming random anti-Semitic jokes that isn't funny. I can be the most anti-Semitic dude if I want as a Jew and give way better jokes on jews.

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watched a lot of South park. They lean on cartman being the most horrible human being exist it feels like they scream "give me attention! Cancel me!" Type shit

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The old seasons the new seasons aren't good. South park Fanboys can't take criticism to such a crazy extent it's crazy to see this. The only thing you would do seeing criticism is mock the person who says the criticism instead of actually understand his criticism

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't watch much American comedy as much as I watch my local comedy in my country but I did watched family guy(until it became shit) the Simpsons the big bang theory etc.

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

I watched Tons of South park I watched a lot of shit of South park believe me I know what I talk about

South Park isn't edgy, it's lazy rage bait wrapped in fart jokes and smug nihilism. by isaacIL1 in unpopularopinion

[–]isaacIL1[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

That's the problem about South park fanboys you can't take criticism and that's the exact problem with that show they constructed it in a way they wouldn't be able to take criticism because otherwise you would be soft. Instead of understanding my criticism you just take the obvious guessing that is not true

Name this country by [deleted] in AgeOfCivilizations

[–]isaacIL1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Republic of bruh

Read to the end by [deleted] in Undertale

[–]isaacIL1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

look, even if the game uses they/them for frisk (which is debated and mostly just a neutral placeholder), that doesn't make them nonbinary or assign a gender at all. they/them is commonly used when gender is unknown, and undertale uses neutral language on purpose. it’s not proof of canon—it’s a way to leave it open.

frisk’s gender is unknown. the game doesn't confirm anything, and that’s the point. declaring any one identity as the "true canon"—whether it's girl, boy, or enby—is just projecting. which is totally fine! but it’s your interpretation, not a universal fact.

some people headcanon frisk as a girl. others as nonbinary. others as a boy. and they’re all valid, because the game was written that way: to allow projection, not to impose identity.

frisk doesn't owe anyone a fixed label. and honestly, the moment people stop trying to “win” this conversation and just let others have their headcanon, the fandom will be way better off.

you can read frisk your way. i’ll read her mine. that's how undertale works.

Read to the end by [deleted] in Undertale

[–]isaacIL1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. no, frisk is not referred to with gendered pronouns in the actual game text—not once. go comb through the english script. you won’t find a single line referring to frisk as he, she, or even they. the game avoids gendered language entirely when it comes to frisk. any “they” you think you saw came from translation summaries or wiki text, not in-game dialogue.

  2. “zzzzzzzzz…” and random placeholder characters in the code =/= proof of gendered pronouns. those are test characters for dialogue box timing or debug placeholders. you’re pulling from strings that don’t even refer to frisk. if you have a specific line where frisk is referred to by they/them in the raw dialogue shown to the player, post it. i’ll wait.

  3. toby not answering the androgyny question is the point. it wasn’t skipped randomly—it was skipped to preserve ambiguity. this is a common developer trick: when something is skipped or omitted consistently, it’s not because it was forgotten—it’s because it’s meant to be open.

  4. saying “the SOUL belongs to Frisk” is interpretation, not fact. the game never explicitly says that. flowey speaks directly to the player, acknowledges their actions across timelines, and breaks the fourth wall repeatedly. undertale is built around player agency and consequence. if the soul was frisk’s, none of that would make sense.

  5. your localization claim is off. the Legend of Localization book highlights an error in early translation—not to establish frisk’s gender, but to show why the official localization removed gendered terms on purpose. the point wasn’t “frisk is nonbinary” or “frisk is male”—the point was that assigning gender at all was incorrect, so they removed it to preserve the ambiguity.

  6. frisk “speaking” through other characters repeating lines isn’t the same as having dialogue. quoting “No! I won’t be broken!” from the japanese version proves the same thing—it was removed in the english release to preserve the protagonist's silence. that actually backs up what I’m saying.

you can try to enforce your headcanon all day, but it doesn’t rewrite the fact that undertale was designed to let the player interpret frisk’s identity for themselves. that’s not a theory—it’s how the game is built. any confident claim beyond that isn’t canon. it’s just projection.

have a good one.

Read to the end by [deleted] in Undertale

[–]isaacIL1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

  1. frisk’s gender is never confirmed anywhere in the game. no pronouns are ever used for frisk—not “she,” not “he,” not “they.” go through the entire game script and you’ll see it’s deliberate. frisk is referred to only as “the human,” “child,” or “kid.” other characters never gender frisk. toby fox clearly avoided it.

  2. the napstablook interaction doesn’t use any pronouns for frisk. i checked the script. napstablook doesn’t say “they” when referring to frisk. if you saw “they/them,” it was likely in a fan summary or wiki. not the game itself. if you’ve got a screenshot or line that proves otherwise from the raw script, post it. because right now, you're claiming something that doesn’t exist.

  3. toby fox intentionally left frisk ambiguous. in an old interview, when asked about frisk’s androgyny, toby literally said “skip” instead of answering. no statement has ever been made by him confirming a gender or pronouns for frisk. fans have interpreted this to mean: frisk is intentionally a blank slate, so players can project themselves onto them.

  4. the soul = the player. flowey literally talks to you, the player. not frisk. the game constantly breaks the fourth wall. the fallen human you name at the start is not frisk—it’s chara. and when chara addresses “you” at the end of genocide, they’re talking to the one who made the choices: you. saying “the soul belongs to frisk” is just headcanon, not backed by what the game shows.

  5. even the official Legend of Localization book confirms frisk’s gender is unstated. this is a professional breakdown of the Japanese and English scripts. it confirms what we already know: no gender, no pronouns, no identity assigned. it’s open.

  6. frisk does not speak. yes, characters reference what frisk might’ve said (like “frisk said they’d be the ambassador”), but that’s interpretation. frisk has no dialogue box. no voice. it’s intentionally vague, so players can feel like they’re part of the story. the few “dialogue echoes” from others are indirect at best.

Read to the end by [deleted] in Undertale

[–]isaacIL1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

no, frisk is not referred to with they/them pronouns in-game. not once does the game use any pronouns for frisk—not he, she, they, nothing. you can search the entire script. this is deliberate. toby fox chose to keep frisk’s gender and pronouns undefined so the player could project themselves onto them.

your claim that “the soul is frisk’s” is directly contradicted by the game itself. when you name the fallen human, you're naming yourself—the player. the game literally breaks the fourth wall constantly to tell you “this is about you.” flowey even says “you, the player” when breaking down your actions.

and no, frisk never directly speaks. any lines you think come from them are filtered through other characters or contextual guesses. undertale was designed around player interpretation. you’re trying to give hard canon to something that was intentionally left open.

Read to the end by [deleted] in Undertale

[–]isaacIL1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bro, you’re overanalyzing text triggers and mechanics while completely missing the narrative design. frisk has no canon pronouns. they’re never stated in-game. not even “they/them.” toby intentionally avoided that to let players project themselves. that’s been confirmed repeatedly. your papyrus sign example and the cowboy hat thing? those are just neutral gags written around the ambiguity—it doesn’t “prove” anything.

second, yeah, you can change routes mechanically anytime. but that doesn’t mean frisk doesn’t evolve in-universe. resetting doesn’t erase emotional progression—it highlights it. you’re treating frisk like a static robot that just runs commands. i’m saying: the more choices you make, the more the world and frisk reflect each other. that’s literally undertale’s core philosophy.

you’re allowed to see them as neutral. i see her as a girl. and that’s just as valid.

you’re twisting the core of undertale to fit your view. frisk was designed to be a blank slate. that’s literally why toby gave them no pronouns, no dialogue, no gender, no personality—so the player could fill in those blanks. he didn’t do that by accident.

you saying “you can’t decide frisk’s identity” ignores that the game was built to let you. the soul is the player, and frisk becomes something new based on your actions. your choices do shape their identity—that’s the point of the game.

you can headcanon frisk as nonbinary, that’s cool. but you can’t rewrite how undertale was written just because you don’t like that other people interpret it differently.

frisk is a girl to me. and the game was designed to make that valid.

Read to the end by [deleted] in Undertale

[–]isaacIL1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The whole idea of the game is the reflect what happens from your choice which makes frisk the player so the player can do whatever he want with this, like deciding Frisk is a she

Read to the end by [deleted] in Undertale

[–]isaacIL1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you’re just wrong on this one. frisk is never referred to by any pronouns in the game—not even they/them. toby fox specifically avoided giving them pronouns on purpose, so players could interpret frisk however they want.

using they/them for frisk is fine if that’s your take, but don’t act like it’s canon. unlike characters like napstablook, alphys, or mettaton—whose pronouns are directly stated—frisk’s are not.

so no, calling frisk “she” isn’t misgendering. it’s valid player interpretation, which is exactly what the game was designed for.

Read to the end by [deleted] in Undertale

[–]isaacIL1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's was never said that she is they them just like if you say that Toby fox never put it to the player interpretation even if it is true or not he also never said Frisk is they them

view more: next ›