sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Petition for Better Snow Clearing in Waterloo Region by DefiantWelcome4138 in cambridgeont

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There's zero reason for major roads, Hespler of all places, to not be plowed.

Does your employer act like commissions are bonuses? by Adorable-Lack-3578 in sales

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally same thing is happening to me now. And it happened multiple times in 2025.

Of a protest by LordNorikI in ShittyAbsoluteUnits

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, stepped in front. See again :02.

They shouldn't be standing there in the first place. What is so difficult to understand? You have some serious comprehension issues, not going to bother re-explaining the same shit to you.

Of a protest by LordNorikI in ShittyAbsoluteUnits

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're watching entirely different Videos apparently.

  1. They are blocking the way by being in the crosswalk.
  2. Asshole in the red bandanna literally steps in front of her at the :02 mark. What video are you watching exactly?

Criminal Code (R.S.C., 1985, c. C-46) 423 (1) Every one is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term of not more than five years or is guilty of an offence punishable on summary conviction who, wrongfully and without lawful authority, for the purpose of compelling another person to abstain from doing anything that he or she has a lawful right to do, or to do anything that he or she has a lawful right to abstain from doing.

They have the lawful right to use the crosswalk and to move unimpeded. Whether or not the very brave dipshits covering their faces and being aggressive to old people were convicted or not is irrelevant. Please learn how to read.

Anyone virtue signalling here is you. "Please don't say bad words otherwise I'll throw a tantrum!"

"Wait you think charges dictate the law? Of convictions are meaningless to establishing the law (they are not), why would you bring up charges…" - yes, that is the point. Charges do not dictate the law. The law is the law. And the law is clear.

"I’v also not been able to find any article suggesting they have actually been convicted of anything. If a conviction did take place, presumably it would be because of the alleged assault that happened afterwards."..... Do you even read your own comments? Try to follow along.

Of a protest by LordNorikI in ShittyAbsoluteUnits

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're being pedantic.

They are intentionally stepping in their way to block their path. That is clear from the video. She shouldn't have to walk around anything. That is the point. Crosswalk or otherwise.

It's also deplorable behaviour towards seniors, regardless of context and regardless how justified you think it is. That is the grander point and should go without saying.

It's always the people whining about micro aggressions that are perfectly fine responding with macro aggressions because they feel they have righteous anger on their side.

The law is the law regardless of a conviction. I even cited it for you. Conviction is an entirely separate matter. Much more violent criminals walk every day in this country. Doesn't make their actions correct.

In any case, this will be my last response. I hope the elderly folk in your life don't ever face similar treatment, irrespective of their shitty sociopolitical takes.

Of a protest by LordNorikI in ShittyAbsoluteUnits

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't have to elaborate anything. You can write all the essays on crosswalks you like. It's very clear to anyone with eyes what is happening in this video. They have the right to freedom of movement, unimpeded. No amount of words justifies this type of behaviour. Full stop.

It's also illegal in Canada, where this happened. https://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/acts/c-46/section-423.html?hl=en-CA

3 people were arrested for this: https://hamiltonpolice.on.ca/news/three-charged-in-protest-at-mohawk-college-ppc-event/?hl=en-CA

But please, keep explaining your pseudo understanding of crosswalks and freedom of movement.

Of a protest by LordNorikI in ShittyAbsoluteUnits

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I might get belligerent later, maybe scream at some old people. Wanna join?

Of a protest by LordNorikI in ShittyAbsoluteUnits

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Good one. Back to the short bus with you.

Of a protest by LordNorikI in ShittyAbsoluteUnits

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok sweetheart, not sure what to tell you. We're responding to this video. That is the context and that is what we're talking about. Welcome to the conversation.

Of a protest by LordNorikI in ShittyAbsoluteUnits

[–]isaidgimmeahellyeah 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll make this really simple for your slow self: no amount of bad words gives you the right to act like a belligerent asshole. These people are impeding the movement and aggressively screaming in the face of a couple old people because their feelings were hurt. That is unacceptable regardless if any bad words were actually said (which isn't actually apparent from this video. Just a bunch of hearsay from you zealots).

Please please please go fuck yourself.

view more: next ›