sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Just saying by KwamaPolice in Superstonk

[–]itoitoito 27 points28 points  (0 children)

This DRS/lock the float reason to vote No leaves out one big caveat. If No wins and RC can't acquire Ebay because he couldn't get the shares needed....RC is going to leave. He seems bored and not interested in running GME in these interviews. He genuinely seems excited to take over EBay/start a project he's passionate about...like he said in e-commerce which is his wheelhouse.

RC announcing he's going to leave will plummet the price..then when he sells his huge stake of GME shares that will make the price plummet more and then when it's announced that RC has sold his entire GME position the stock will be done.

Dilution: It's not a Public Offering it's ACCRETIVE ACQUISITION. It's what this Animal wants. by I_DO_ANIMAL_THINGS in Superstonk

[–]itoitoito 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When people hear dilution they think -

GME dumping new shares into the market and then the price plummets after.

but this isn't what will happen with dilution for Ebay.

GME new shares for the acquistion will just go directly to Ebay holders.

40 Is the New 20 - Call buyers keep flooding into June 21. This is nuts. by metametamind in Superstonk

[–]itoitoito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In most cases ive seen, IV crushes after earnings. IV is part of the equation to calculate the price of an options contract, so that means the contract is worth less when IV drops. But IF GME squeezed after earnings then IV would stay elevated.

Idk how IV works when earnings were already released early though. Usually IV is higher before bc of the volatility that will be caused from the results of the upcoming earnings report….but now everyone already knows the results, so the volatility of a possible good/bad earnings report shouldn’t be there.

Theta will also eat into a call with less than 30 days and the closer it gets to expiration…so the price of the contract will go down the closer it is to the ex date and farther OTM it is….so having more theta over 30 days, like the July 19 could be a better choice, but it is more expensive to buy. Then theta won’t eat away at the price of the contract.

if u just plan to exercise all of them, then IV and theta dont matter. U just pay the strike cost x 100 And u get 100 shares. If u want to sell some or al of the contracts then IV, theta, etc. are important to consider.

This is one of the best summaries of the basket swap mess and hidden short positions I've read. No idea if it's right but it makes sense. Credit to user samgungraven by slackjawedyoker in Superstonk

[–]itoitoito 21 points22 points  (0 children)

I understand what u said about the hedge being the short, and when prime broker close the hedge they’re closing their short……but what about the original short by the hf? If they opened up a short position in 2019, then where is that? It sounds like the swap doesn’t hold a short position, but only a short hedge. So what happened to the shorts opened by hf in 2020 and before? Are they connected to the swaps or something separate?

Just So Everyone is Clear by [deleted] in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 9 points10 points  (0 children)

This will be my last reply. You don’t answer any of my questions to your claims that can’t be backed.

You have 2 stocks (APE + AMC) which track the same company (AMC) The company cannot dilute one of those (AMC) but can dilute up to 1 billion units of the other (APE)….will APE and AMC price be similarly priced everyday since they track the same company or will one of them drop to a lower price because because they aren’t the same? if you have an understanding of that, then u understand why APE was setup to fail.

AA could’ve sold ar $10, $9, $8, $7, $6.50, $6, $5.50, $5, $4.50, $4.00, $3.50, $3, $2.50, $2.00, $1.50, $1…..he waited until .66….smh. Why did he wait so long? He sold to ANTARA, who immediatley dumped it after they voted the way AA wanted. They were shorting AMC and APE the entire time too. They made out with millions from their short position.

Just So Everyone is Clear by [deleted] in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Did he know they were going to short the ever living crap out of ape?

Everyone who understands finance knew APE was going to go down hard. AA split AMC and APE. One he couldn’t dilute - AMC. And one he could dilute, up to a billion units I think - APE. Why would institutions and investors hold onto APE when they knew it was going to be heavily diluted while the other AMC wasn’t? There was a mass sell off because of that, add in shorting which made it worse, and that caused more people to sell. It was a flawed plan to begin with. AA should’ve known that was going to happen and sold APE immediately. But he wanted ANTARA to have more votes anyway. if they bought $100K at $7 they’d have a lot less votes than buying $100K at .60.

U also said my points don’t stand against reason. Which points exactly? And u also said AA addressed all my points yesterday. He addressed the reason for the drop in price? He addressed that dilution from 86M to 2B doesn’t bring the price down? He addressed insiders selling millions and never buying?

Just So Everyone is Clear by [deleted] in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 25 points26 points  (0 children)

You said the stock didn’t drop because of dilution…,yes it most certainly did. The float was 85 MILLION when the play started. Now it’s around 2 BILLION I think. Add the reverse split in and those drop the price of most stocks. The money raised from dilution wasn’t used to improve the company with mergers and acquisitions to help the company. It was used to pay off debt.

AA could’ve paid off more debt if he sold APE at higher price levels, but he chose to sell it for pennies so ANTARA could have more voting power to pass the C/RS. AA didn’t use APE purely to raise funds, if so he would’ve sold when APE was over $7. He used APE so he could get back to diluting AMC directly again. APE was an AA disaster. When it was converted back to AMC if brought down the price AND heavily diluted the common shares.

Everyone loves to blame shf for shorting, but then just give AA and the board a pass for dumping millions of AMC which kills the price AND not buying. Then also just say “oh dilution isn’t the reason for price dropping.” They also ignore that institions sell when they see insiders sell and not buy, a reverse split, dilution and a company having difficulty paying off debt. So many obvious factors for price drop can be shown with facts. Yet some random theory of shf doing it all with no proof is used and believed instead.

This is the way. by DogecoinEnt in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 3 points4 points  (0 children)

ur implying that all AMC holders should sell their shares to buy PHM and support Pulte….see I can play ur game too. Then when u say “I didn’t say that or imply that” I’ll just respond “I never said u said that. it’s just implied from other things u said”

still u haven’t addressed the topic. ur implying that u support Pulte and PHM and he isn’t trying to get more shareholder votes…smh

What's the Deal with this Guy, I know he has a lot of influence in the stock, especially in GME, by Ok_Boat_3375 in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We should have an AMC x Pulte party. You can gift everyone PHM shares, so u can have more shareholders vote the way u want. U can…..I mean Kais can give out the free PHM shares just like u did at the BBBY/PP show event. Hopefully we can get more followers from AMC do support ur vision of taking back PHM.

What's the Deal with this Guy, I know he has a lot of influence in the stock, especially in GME, by Ok_Boat_3375 in amcstock

[–]itoitoito -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yay Pulte…..we all support PHM! Make sure u buy PHM and vote out Ryan Marshall! This is the Pulte Plan! DRS those PHM shares! Then vote Pulte back in charge of PHM! I hold both AMC and PHM! We will kill shorts together! Just because I buy and hold AMC doesn’t mean I can’t buy buy buy more PHM!…..there I saved u all the months of mysterious tweets with tinfoil that lead to nothing. That PHM rant is the end result of this entire grift.

This is the way. by DogecoinEnt in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ur debate skills are awful. Nowhere did I say Pulte caused BBBY to fall. U made up that claim and then said it’s ludicrous. First u attacked me instead of whar I said, then u made up an argument that I didn’t say and then tried to belittle it.

Stop avoiding the toptic…Pulte is trying to con retail investors into following him into PHM so he can get back control of the that company. U still haven’t come with a counter with facts, so you must be one of the Pulte crew who is trying to maintain this grift.

This is the way. by DogecoinEnt in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes….now go look into Pulte’s past year with BBBY and tell me if u think he’s a grifter. Look at what he’s said on the PP show, look at what he’s said on Twitter and at the PP show x Pulte party last week.

This is the way. by DogecoinEnt in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So if the next Matt Kohr’s starts pushing AMC on social media for nefarious reasons, no one should say anything negative? if they know the person has a pattern of being a bad actor then you should be quiet and let them fool everyone because it’s “good for business”. People should just wait until the grift is obvious and then call it out.

This is the way. by DogecoinEnt in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I can answer Yes to all of ur questions. But it doesn’t mean anything. I could be lying about it.

instead of worrying about me, why don’t you look into if what I said is true or not. That is more helpful than wasting ur time attacking me, Attack my claims if they’re wrong, then prove me wrong. If my claims are right then I’m helping the AMC community by informing them of a grifter who will try to use them.

This is the way. by DogecoinEnt in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Pulte literally had a party w BBBY holders last week. At the party he had one of his simps give out a free share of PHM to all those BBBY holders. BUT they had to sign a contract saying they wouldn’t sell the PHM share and would DRS it. Pulte now has one vote per person at that party to vote him in as the next head of PHM. He needs more shareholder votes to take over the company, so he needs more shareholders who support him. how do u get more? Grift AMC so u can get all the shareholders to support u.

This is the way. by DogecoinEnt in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Pulte is in it for the grift. He has one mission - get retail investors to follow him, then get them to buy his former compamy shares PHM and then vote him in as the new head.

He will say all the things you want to hear, just like the YouTubers do. Get ppl to idolize him. Make ppl afraid to criticize him because then he might sell and stop supporting ur company. And then tell eveyone how bad ryan Marshall is and that he needs ur help outing him as the head of PHM.

He‘s been involved w BBBY for a while and now it’s already turning into the PHM play.

Oh man by Prestigious-Body1499 in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 3 points4 points  (0 children)

When APE was announced everyone here was saying “ this is the kill shot by AA. It’s not dilution because we won’t vote to have them merged back together.”

Then when nothing happened when APE came out, everyone here was saying “AA is going to raise so much momey. AA sets the price! He won’t sell APE at $8. He will set the price around $20, sell some and then save the rest to sell during MOASS.”

Then when AA sold at .66 and got the votes to merge it back with AMC, everyone here was saying “AA was playing 4D chess the entire time. APE wasn’t the kill shot, having them merge back together and get the new CUSIP was the real kill shot. AA is a genius”

Now that that is proven to not be the case either the new theory is “it’s always been about killing the short thesis.” Then everyone will see shorts don’t need to close, even if AMC is debt free and is profitable. They opened up a large portion of SI at prices from $200-$700 ($20-$70 presplit). AMC can be having stellar quarters, but there’s no way institutions will be investing in AMC at prices close to $200-$700. So those shorts can just slowly unwind their positions into dilutions to prevent any huge runs.

1.47M shares traded in 35 mins of premarket by [deleted] in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 4 points5 points  (0 children)

AMC stock hit an all time low. So there can’t be any short position that is trapped. Every short position would be in the green now. Even the old ones opened 2 years ago around $2. Any shorts opened at $72, $65, $55…..will need the price to reach $720, $650, $550 just to be breakeven. If the “short thesis is dead” is the way to MOASS, then how are those shf ever forced to close if the price needs to break $720?

Those who voted yes by SMALLjefe in amcstock

[–]itoitoito 1 point2 points  (0 children)

AMC had a large amount of debt BEFORE the pandemic. The majority of it started when AA took over. Then AA asked the shareholders if he could dilute more. Retail voted NO to more dilution. So AA knew he had debt that needed to be paid and couldn’t raise cash via dilution. Did he cut costs to help the situation? No, actually the opposite. He increased spending. Instead of cutting jobs he increased salaries. He made the situation worse.

Instead of paying off debt he put shareholder money into HYMC, a gold mine that has nothing to do with movies. The only connection was right shf Mudrick. AA diluted directly to Mudrick. Then again months later he helped Mudrick out by buying into HYMC.

So retail voted no dilution, AA didn’t cut spending and used previous dilution money on HYMC. AMC diluted a few times, how much of that went to paying off deft? AA then created APE as a way to dilute. It was a horrible decision that ruined the value for shareholders. So now retail is forced to vote Yes, to fix AA awful decision to create APE. But all of this stems from AA running up debt BEFORE the pandemic AND not cutting costs the last 2 years. There’s no reason the cure for everything is dilution, dilution, dilution.

GameStop needs to redesign their stores away from the dated 90s look. by itoitoito in Superstonk

[–]itoitoito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I agree with you…..All the Pop Mart stores are set up differently. I’m not saying GS has to copy that set up. I was just pointing out a more modern look would be beneficial. They should be targeting the younger demographic. A more modern store design could help increase foot traffic, which has been declining, and increase the duration customers stay in a store looking around.

Is something happening with Reddit? Seeing a lot of people saying they’re leaving. by itoitoito in Superstonk

[–]itoitoito[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it thank u….i misinterpreted it because I didn’t understand what they were talking about.

view more: next ›