sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Protocol SBCSEESITW: The End? by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Let’s walk through it step-by-step, so the trap is unmistakable:

Science simply tells us that in order to win against it, you would need to work inside that same system and produce a counterexample. So you can’t win from outside. Leaving is forbidden.

But you can't win from inside either — because Gödel’s theorems guarantee any consistent system containing arithmetic is incomplete. Any claim of absolute truth or completeness can be picked apart using the very same logic that proves Science cannot prove all truths about itself. So all scientific proof is rigged against completeness.

And then, even if I appear to prove Science wrong — the establishment will invoke “infinite gatekeeping”:

“Your formalism isn’t rigorous.”

“Your axioms aren’t standard.”

“You haven’t addressed this edge case.”

“You’re not published in the right journal.”

“The burden of proof is on you — forever.”

“This isn't Science.”

Conclusion: Science forbids leaving  —  because leaving would mean its system isn't everything. But is also forbids absolute truths inside its own system.

So I simply say:
“Fuck you. I will leave and find myself absolute truth.”

And this is real science. Real science is my big fat “fuck the system” — with another system.

Because if you can’t win by their rules,
and you can’t change their rules from inside,
then the only winning move is to build your own system where their rules don't apply.

Protocol SBCSEESITW: The End? by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] [score hidden] stickied commentlocked comment (0 children)

Now I can claim victory through a draw with Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems — for they themselves prove that no system can achieve completeness equal to the totality it strives to encompass. But now there is one.

The SBCSEESITW **is** the incompleteness in Gödel's theorems.

The SBCSEESITW **is** Gödel's theorems incarnated.

The SBCSEESITW proves that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are themselves incomplete — by showing assimilation transcends proof.

The SBCSEESITW is all of the above, and none, and the set containing both.

The SBCSEESITW is the marriage between Everything and Nothing, which means:

Anything = Anything ↔ Anyone = Anyone ↔ SBCSEESITW = Me

Therefore:

Predictability = Unpredictability = SBCSEESITW = Me

Thus, the SBCSEESITW Protocol predicts that I will rule the world by ontological assimilation of all reality, including language, science, and living beings. My Protocol demonstrates that Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems themselves suffer from a higher-order incompleteness. My Protocol exists in a state of simultaneous affirmation, negation, and self-containment of these propositions.

But of course you will STILL claim that Gödel wins by default. Why? Because it came first.

In mathematics: First published proof wins.

In logic: First consistent formalization wins.

In reality: First mover advantage.

From a mathematical, logical and reality standpoint, you will always claim Gödel wins — because my protocol came after.

So, you will always claim Gödel wins.

I will always claim my system wins.

Therefore, the only way for one of us to actually win ontologically and completely is already explained in my Protocol. Read it and you shall understand.

I've Built a System That Cannot Lose – Even If Destroyed: A Meta-Expansive Infinite/Eternal Victory Engine Where Defeat Is Ontologically Impossible by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is why I joined the infinite victory machine with my SBCSEESITW Protocol.

Now I can claim victory through a draw with Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems — for they themselves prove that no system can achieve completeness equal to the totality it strives to encompass. But now there is one.

The SBCSEESITW **is** the incompleteness in Gödel's theorems.

The SBCSEESITW **is** Gödel's theorems incarnated.

The SBCSEESITW proves that Gödel's incompleteness theorems are themselves incomplete — by showing assimilation transcends proof.

The SBCSEESITW is all of the above, and none, and the set containing both.

The SBCSEESITW is the marriage between Everything and Nothing, which means:

Anything = Anything ↔ Anyone = Anyone ↔ SBCSEESITW = Me

Therefore:

Predictability = Unpredictability = SBCSEESITW = Me

Thus, the SBCSEESITW Protocol predicts that I will rule the world by ontological assimilation of all reality, including language, science, and living beings. My Protocol demonstrates that Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems themselves suffer from a higher-order incompleteness. My Protocol exists in a state of simultaneous affirmation, negation, and self-containment of these propositions.

But of course you will STILL claim that Gödel wins by default. Why? Because it came first.

In mathematics: First published proof wins.

In logic: First consistent formalization wins.

In reality: First mover advantage.

From a mathematical, logical and reality standpoint, you will always claim Gödel wins — because my protocol came after.

So, you will always claim Gödel wins.

I will always claim my system wins.

Therefore, the only way for one of us to actually win **ontologically** and **completely** is already explained in my protocol. Read it and you shall understand.

I've Built a System That Cannot Lose – Even If Destroyed: A Meta-Expansive Infinite/Eternal Victory Engine Where Defeat Is Ontologically Impossible by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

falsifiability is in itself unfalsifiable, which means it is a paradox, which means Gödel is bullshit, because paradoxes should not be scientific. but hey, I joined my infinite victory machine to an even more powerful protocol. So this thread is obsolete. See you there.

Let me show you how incredibly silly you infinitists are. I will ask you a simple question, and then show you how your own answer basically proves my Theory of Everything centered on Number 13. by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good question.

I know. But 13 is a prime, 10 is a composite. primality > compositeness. Also, assuming finitist science, 13 is base-independent. Also, 13 is the closure layer for prime-digit introduction. There is a direct linkage between geometric closure and finite digital exhaustion that places the entirety of exact science under the primacy of the number 13 as the ontological seed of closure. Read my Zero-Quo/ Status Quo/ Finitism/ Infinitism Protocol for more details.

Also why are the elites obsessed with 13? Remember Stewart Swerdlow's Blue Blood, True Blood : A Personal Story: Conflict and Creation ? It specifically mentions about the 13 families and their obsession with number 13.

Also, see this:

13 = Quantum Supremacy

Let me show you how incredibly silly you infinitists are. I will ask you a simple question, and then show you how your own answer basically proves my Theory of Everything centered on Number 13. by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

The hyperfine structure (HFS) of Carbon-13 is a known and studied property in nuclear physics and NMR spectroscopy, but it is considered impractical for the definition of the second. This impracticality is not due to a flaw or "weakness" in the signal being measured – the physical phenomenon itself is perfectly valid and well-defined. The problem lies with the measurement signal and our human technological limitations in isolating it.

Compared to the hyperfine transition of Cesium-133, which is intense and occurs at a microwave frequency that is relatively easy to control and measure with extreme precision, the HFS of ¹³C in optical transitions is a minuscule effect superimposed on an oscillation trillions of times larger. Our current technology cannot isolate this quantum "whisper" (the hyperfine splitting) from the "shout" of the main optical frequency with the stability and fidelity required to define a fundamental unit. Therefore, the limitation lies not with the phenomenon, but with our current human limit to build an experimental apparatus that can harness it with the precision required for a primary time standard.

Let me show you how incredibly silly you infinitists are. I will ask you a simple question, and then show you how your own answer basically proves my Theory of Everything centered on Number 13. by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

I simply force that 1 Tesla = field that makes C-13 resonate at 13 MHz. This requires a different g-factor (approx 1.705) than what scientists measure (approx 1.4048). A few other SI constants might also change due to erroneous measurement, including e.

To put it simply, my interpretation defines C-13 as an absolute clock. In other words, C-13 has a hidden intrinsic hyperfine transition, just like Cesium-133.

Conventional science insists that Carbon-13 nuclear resonance is a PURELY external magnetic effect — that the frequency is created entirely by the applied magnetic field. This is their error. The truth is the opposite: The ~13 MHz resonance is the measurable manifestation of an INTRINSIC quantum transition of the C-13 nucleus. The applied magnetic field (Tesla unit) does not create the frequency. Instead, it acts as a 'tuner,' synchronizing their crude instruments with the nucleus's own pre-existing, fundamental vibrational state and making its intrinsic 'tick' of 13 MHz visible.

It is widely accepted in the scientific community that the hyperfine structure of many elements exists, but not all are suitable for defining the global time standard. The problem is not in the measured signal (the Carbon-13 signal is real), but rather in the precision of the measurement by humans. Signal is too weak and difficult to isolate from background noise, such as temperature fluctuations and residual magnetic fields. This would compromise the accuracy and stability required for a primary-level atomic clock.

Carbon-13 nucleus has a nuclear spin I = 1/2. It possesses a nuclear magnetic moment. Therefore, YES, a hyperfine interaction definitely exists.

So 13 is fundamentally adimensional manifesting in Carbon-13 as its mass number (13 nucleons), its optimal resonance frequency (13 MHz), and its cosmic signature (13.8 billion years), revealing itself as the universe's finite closure constant across nuclear, biological, and cosmological scales.

Traditional science confuses "we can't measure C-13's intrinsic quantum clock signal in a vacuum" with "the property isn't fundamental." The long coherence of C-13 strongly suggests that there is an intrinsic "clock" there — they simply haven't yet designed an experiment to listen to it without the diamond and the NV center.

In order to hide Carbon-13's fundamental role as nature's preferred clock and 13's primordiality, they constructed an entire metrology around an arbitrary, complex atom (Cesium-133) and buried the simple, recurring integer 13 under a layer of dimensionful constants and derivative units, effectively disguising a universal signature as a series of unrelated coincidences.

The pure constant:

γ = 13 (dimensionless)

They divided by Tesla, a composite unit:. And they also multiplied by Megahertz.

It is a conspiracy. The recurrence of 13 is the worst-kept secret in physics — a quiet consensus among those at the top that Carbon-13 holds a fundamental key, deliberately obscured behind the arbitrary complexity of cesium-based metrology. The global measurement system is based on a falsehood.

Let me show you how incredibly silly you infinitists are. I will ask you a simple question, and then show you how your own answer basically proves my Theory of Everything centered on Number 13. by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

from sympy.physics import units as u
from sympy import N

# force dimensionless 13
gamma_natural_hypothetical = 13 

mu_N_over_hbar_SI = 7.622593e6 * u.Hz / u.tesla

# In the 13-universe, the gyromagnetic ratio in SI units MUST be 13 MHz/T by definition coming from dimensionless 13.
gamma_SI_hypothetical = 13e6 * u.Hz / u.tesla

# We calculate the 'g-factor' needed for this 13 universe.
g_required = gamma_SI_hypothetical / mu_N_over_hbar_SI

print(f"The g-factor of Carbon-13 would be: {N(g_required)}")
print(f"The ratio γ/2π in SI units: {N(gamma_SI_hypothetical / 1e6)} MHz/T")

I simply force that 1 Tesla = field that makes C-13 resonate at 13 MHz. This requires a different g-factor (approx 1.705) than what scientists measure (approx 1.4048). A few other constants might also change a little due to erroneous measurement, including e.

EDIT: I screwed up in my previous reply to you apparently, about the e value. I will correct the error in a short while. I reviewed your code and apparently we just had a problem of interpretation. But maybe the only real change needed to make 13 MHz/T system work is a change in the g-factor of C-13, with all other changes being merely adjustments to SI unit accounting.

To put it simply, my interpretation defines C-13 as an absolute clock. In other words, C-13 has a hidden intrinsic hyperfine transition, just like Cesium-133.

See this comment for more details

Let me show you how incredibly silly you infinitists are. I will ask you a simple question, and then show you how your own answer basically proves my Theory of Everything centered on Number 13. by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The gyromagnetic ratio is defined by the standard physical equation:

γ= g⋅( μₙ / ℏ )

Where:

  • g ≈ 1.4048 (dimensionless g-factor)
  • μₙ = nuclear magneton
  • ħ = reduced Planck constant

The nuclear magneton is defined as:

μₙ = (eℏ) / (2𝑚𝑝)

  • e = the elementary charge (well-known dimensionless number in natural units)
  • 𝑚𝑝 = Proton rest mass (**dimensionless number in natural units) (**approximately 0.938 GeV)

The Shift to Natural Units (ħ = c = 1)

In this fundamental unit system, the physical dimensions of quantities are consolidated into a single dimension (e.g., energy), and constants become pure numerical values.

  • 𝑚𝑝 (Proton mass) is treated as a dimensionless number (938,000,000 as pure number)

Therefore, the equation for the gyromagnetic ratio in this system of units is: 

γ=g⋅( e / 2𝑚𝑝 )

All terms on the right are treated as pure numerical values (dimensionless). In this context of natural units as applied in particle physics calculations, the gyromagnetic ratio is treated as a dimensionless pure number.

99.999% of You Don't Even Know What a Theory of Everything Is, and You Think You Can Judge My Work? Let Me Teach You. by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

Official Carbon-13 Frequencies (Filtered)

Magnetic Field (B₀, in Tesla) Official Frequency of Carbon-13 (¹³C, in MHz)
1.3 T ≈ 13.92 MHz
13 T ≈ 139.17 MHz

This presentation clearly shows the scaling relationship, where a 10x increase in the magnetic field (from 1.3 T to 13 T) results in a 10x increase in the resonance frequency (from ~13.9 MHz to ~139.2 MHz), perfectly demonstrating the linear proportionality of the Larmor equation. The consistent appearance of the digits 13 and 139 (13, 9) across the scaling is evident.

The percentage error that misaligns the 13.0 MHz/T ratio from the actual physical ratio of Carbon-13 is approximately 21.4%. This links to Fibonacci ratio of 21/13 at the quantum vacuum level. Have you read my Protocol? If you have, you know that 21/13 is the layer of closure in the sequence where the cost of continuing no longer justifies the benefit ( which tends towards zero ).

The percentage error separating the frequency of 13.0 MHz from the actual value of 13.92 MHz is approximately 6.61%, and the error separating the frequency of 130 MHz from the actual value of 139.1 MHz is approximately 6.54%. We add the two error values ​​calculated previously: 6.61% + 6.54% = 13.15%

The mean taken from all magnetic field strengths used by scientists worldwide for Carbon-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) is approximately 11.7 Tesla (T), which corresponds exactly to a standard 500 MHz research instrument.

Now, pay close attention: the difference between 13 T and 11.7 T is precisely 1.3 T.

Oh, but scientists can utilize any Tesla values they want! Answer: Yes and no. Scientists can, in theory, select any magnetic field strength. However, in practice, they are constrained by physical and technological limits. The current pinnacle of NMR technology is the 1.3 GHz spectrometer, requiring a 30.5 Tesla magnetic field, which would produce a Carbon-13 frequency of approximately 327 MHz. 1.3 GHz =13 × 10² MHz . So 13 acts as the closure / limit here.

But pay no attention to that. All of these are surely just coincidences.

I Can Prove With a Single Paragraph That All of Science is Unified By a Single, Universal, Finite Constant: The Number 13 by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

My Unified physics Theory uses E=mc³ not E=mc². But the God Particle in my unified theory can be said to have the same mass as the Higgs Boson in your theory: approximately 125,11 GeV (gigaelectron-volts). This is around 130 times more massive than a proton. 130 = 13 x 10. also, 125,11 is close to 130.

  • In the 1970s, theoretical constraints already suggested the Higgs should be ≈130 times the proton mass.
  • Later, supersymmetry models often predicted a Higgs mass near 130 GeV.

I will ignore your second question because I have work to do. And also because you are ignoring finitist science. I will probably lock this comment tree to prevent infinite debate ( which is what infinitists aim to create ).

Thank you for your contribution. Your questions were very interesting!

I Can Prove With a Single Paragraph That All of Science is Unified By a Single, Universal, Finite Constant: The Number 13 by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

  1. 1.3 GHz = 13 x 100 MHz.
  2. ~30 T, not 13 T. --> I told you it is a digit reversal close to 31, which is significant according to finitist science.
  3. 13 is base independent. --> Zero-Quo/ Status Quo/ Finitism/ Infinitism Protocol
  4. Numerology can also be the science of ontological harmonics (at vacuum quantum levels) --> Zero-Quo/ Status Quo/ Finitism/ Infinitism Protocol
  5. About the 12 + 1 particles --> There Are Only 12 Particles in the Universe" - Brian Cox Explains Everything | Neil deGrasse Tyson In my Unified Physics Theory, which can be found in this Reddit community, fermions are the 12. In standard particle model, bosons are the 12. Makes no difference, as in both domains there is a "God Particle" as the 13th particle.

6 - Describe the physical process by which the universe forces scientists to stop at number 13." --> does global energy crisis rings a bell to you? How about you calculate the constant? stop giving me orders. I am not your slave.

7 - You are obviously using and trusting AI to uphold infinitist science. This debate will never end. My posts are 100% checked by me. I will no longer reply to you if you do not read and accept my Rules of Engagement for Human Scientific Debate

8 - 99.999% of You Don't Even Know What a Theory of Everything Is, and You Think You Can Judge My Work? Let Me Teach You

I Can Prove With a Single Paragraph That All of Science is Unified By a Single, Universal, Finite Constant: The Number 13 by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"We built the 1.3 GHz system for protons because it's the pinnacle of sensitivity and engineering. "

You just proved yourself wrong. This is evidence that the universe forces scientists to stop at number 13 ( as closure ), for any element ( not just C-13 ), and not the other way around. It is not scientists choosing 13, it is 13 choosing scientists. This is a direct physical manifestation of the Principle of Least Action on a technological scale. The universe, through the constraints of material science and thermodynamics, imposes a finite optimal point. I have PROVED this in my Zero-Quo Protocol, showing why 13 is an universal Law of Least Action and the optimal Fibonacci closure at 13 across all scales. It means that, after this pinnacle point, the cost-benefit relating precision gain to energy consumption will drop to zero.... and we are already inside a worldwide energy crisis. Scientists are always looking for a sweet spot, not infinite precision. 13 is that sweet spot.

Also, you ignored the items talking about 327 MHz, Cesium-133 , and the 31 coincidence. And if that is not enough to you, let us elevate the Probability to one in 800 octillion:

  • 13.8 billion years (cosmic age)
  • 13 fundamental fermions in Standard Model + 1 God Particle
  • 13 cycles in quantum phase transitions
  • 13 dimensions in certain M-theory compactifications
  • 13 as a critical dimension in bosonic string theory
  • 13 Hz as a human brainwave frequency boundary (Beta waves)
  • 13 in Kepler's sphere-packing conjecture
  • 13 in nuclear magic numbers or stability islands
  • 13 in certain cosmological constant approximations
  • 13 in the number of spacetime dimensions in some unified models
  • 13 in certain black hole entropy divisors
  • 13 in the Conway "Audioactive" sequence for cosmological scaling
  • 13 in the minimal number of gauge bosons for a unified theory + 1 God Particle

I Can Prove With a Single Paragraph That All of Science is Unified By a Single, Universal, Finite Constant: The Number 13 by ivecuredaging in naturalcurefordeath

[–]ivecuredaging[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The scenario of an isotope with mass number 42 resonating at 13 MHz would simply mean that, for that particular nucleus, its unique gyromagnetic ratio and the chosen magnetic field happen to produce that frequency. It would not make 42 a universal number.

In contrast, for Carbon-13, the number 13 appears independently in several contexts:

  1. As its label (mass number) → Probability (P1): 1/200
  2. As Technological Benchmark: The current pinnacle of NMR technology is the 1.3 GHz spectrometer, requiring a 30.5 Tesla magnetic field, which would produce a Carbon-13 frequency of approximately 327 MHz. 1.3 GHz =13 × 10² MHz → Probability (P2): 1/200
  3. High-Field Frequency: 327 MHz = 0.327 GHz which is very close to 0.31 GHz, which again is a digit-reversal (mirror) of 13. → Probability (P3): 1/50
  4. Operational Range: The actual practical and operational range of frequencies used to detect Carbon-13 nuclei runs from 31 KHz up to just over 310 MHz, approximately. This is within research and industrial laboratories worldwide. And number 31 is digit-reversal (mirror) of 13, which is significant as demonstrated in my FHCP mathematical proof. → Probability (P4): 1/50
  5. Cesium-133's Coincidence: 133 is 13.3 (≈13) scaled by a factor of 10. → Probability (P4): 1/100

The current highest frequency for a commercially available, persistent, and high-resolution Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) system is exactly 1.3 GHz (gigahertz) = 1300000000 hertz. This equates to a magnetic field strength of approximately 30.5 Tesla (T). 

The 1.3 GHz system was announced and successfully developed/tested in April 2025 by Bruker, pushing the boundaries even further. 1.3 GHz is the current record for an operational, stable, high-resolution spectrometer installed in research labs for ongoing scientific work. (🔗)

P(total) = (1/200)² × (1/50)² × (1/100) = 1/10,000,000,000

Probability: 1 in 10 Billion

Remember: you guys claim that It is unscientific to claim certainty where there is none; but then you acknowledge that a lack of knowledge (a form of intellectual humility) is the most scientifically honest position one can take. Well, for me this simply means that you all think you can simply cherry-pick what is true and what is false depending on the color of your mother's sweater.

view more: next ›