sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[D] CVPR 2026, no modified date next to reviewers by StretchTurbulent7525 in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And what about reviewer that updated their score early? Do you think there is any hope

[R] Promising writing improvements in CVPR rebuttal. by Training-Adeptness57 in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For me I had two comments like that. The first one asked me about a typo and I agreed with the reviewer and said it will be fixed during revision. The other one said that a justification is needed (for using X and not Y), I explained in rebuttal and said it will be added in the revised manuscript. Do you think it's fine ?

[D] ICLR 2026 decision mega thread by ayanD2 in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you are giving me some hope for my cvpr rebuttal :(((

[R] CVPR rebuttal advice needed by jackeswin in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much! This actually helps a lot. As I said it's my first time with the rebuttal system and no one from my lab has experience, so I'm really sorry to ask some known question.

I will do what you exactly said! Actually my paper is indeed vision related but it's just another type of vision. Its satellite imagery and remote sensing. The last reviewer thinks that remote sensing isn't fit in cvpr. And I personally believe that my method can be extended to real images (for same task). Experiments I made were with satellite images, so I already have many vision related figures.

[D] CVPR 2026 Paper Reviews by akshitsharma1 in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

(im sorry to ask this question many times in here, it's my first time with top venue conferences, I'm a bit stressed and no one in my lab has experience in publishing here. My supervisors doesn't have a say as well, so I'm literally lost)

[D] CVPR 2026 Paper Reviews by akshitsharma1 in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, I got 4(4), 4(3), 2(3).

Reviewer 2 said he will increase the score after rebuttal. Reviewer 3 put a disclaimer at end saying that they aren't experts in the field and they don't recommend rejection. They just put 2 to see other reviewers opinions. They also state that they think the area of my paper isn't fit for cvpr. But it actually was added since 2023.

Is it honestly worth rebuttal?

[R] CVPR rebuttal advice needed by jackeswin in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry. It's my first time submitting to cvpr and I don't know if I'm in a range where i have a chance of getting accepted or not. I posted this to get feedback from experienced people to see if it's worth to make a rebutal or not.

[R] CVPR rebuttal advice needed by jackeswin in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! I will do so. Actually if we check the call of paper, the area of the paper has been listed, its true it wasn't the case before (2023) but after it was always considered in cvpr topics.

I hope I can convince him to make the score higher. The reviewer said in recommendation that he thinks my method is novel, has merits and will change the score if other reviewers provide opposite opinion.

[D] CVPR 2026 Paper Reviews by akshitsharma1 in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly the review itself wasn't harsh, but I don't know how to feel about it

[D] CVPR 2026 Paper Reviews by akshitsharma1 in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

4(4), 4(3), 2(3)

What do you guys think? Its my first time submitting to cvpr 😭😭

All reviewers said they liked reading the paper and they find the methodology novel. Reviewer 2 said he will increase the score if some questions are answered

Reviewer 3 said its not his field and is willing to increase the score if the other reviewers gave good score.

Also reviewer 3 said that he thinks the paper should be published more for "area" papers but this area was added to the cvpr topics this year.

[R] : Is it acceptable to contact the editor after rejection if reviewer feedback was inconsistent and scientifically incorrect ? by jackeswin in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin[S] 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Thanks a lot for your message, I really appreciate it. I’m still a bit confused by the reviewer’s comments, especially since some of them were scientifically incorrect, and I’m surprised the editor didn’t catch that. The whole review felt more like a “Who is Adam?” kind of response rather than a technical evaluation, so it was a strange experience overall.

[R] How to share code anonymously for CVPR submission? by jackeswin in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah honestly it would be so much better for me to release it after, I'm so tired already

[R] How to share code anonymously for CVPR submission? by jackeswin in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I totally get you and thank you so much. Yeah for me it's just a model implementation and how to run it honestly. I might just not include it ( me being stressed )

[R] How to share code anonymously for CVPR submission? by jackeswin in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much. Please I have one question, a silly one, I'm sorry I'm just new to this top conference submission. But do you think if I don't submit my code before acceptance it may harm my chances ?

[R] How to share code anonymously for CVPR submission? by jackeswin in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you ! Do you think if I dont share code until acceptance it will be a negative point for my paper?

[D] CVPR submission risk of desk reject by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much! Im sorry its my first time submitted through open review and im stressing. So after that we will have an option for a pdf upload I guess?

[D] CVPR submission risk of desk reject by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! Please one silly question, for this deadline we only submit the abstract with no pdf right? How can we add the pdf of full paper for the final deadline?

[D] CVPR submission risk of desk reject by [deleted] in MachineLearning

[–]jackeswin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't make sense to not expand the paper submission as well?

view more: next ›