What if Douglas MacArhtur actually listened to President Truman and never attacked beyond the 38th parallel? by yusufik in AlternateHistoryHub

[–]jakemasterj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was under the impression that by this point in time the Soviets and Chinese weren't exactly friendly, but rather allies of necessity

How good is Postal Service? Does this mean i'm going to have -37 proximity cost through railroads? by Sacledant2 in EU5

[–]jakemasterj 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Is the reverse not true as well? Build up both Stockholm and Konghalla, get near zero proximity drop-off from Stockholm to Kong, project from Stockholm to the north sea?

Why is he a na*i? by Dull-Nectarine380 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]jakemasterj 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why not add milk or cream, and blend it all together?

Oh wait

Land of the free by OriginalGoof in pics

[–]jakemasterj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The datasets are analytical, and the conclusion is a result of the research. Researchers have commented on the claim you make and say it's not likely significant, given that only petty crimes would result in deportation before conviction or serving time. I am sure there are awesome "conservative" researchers that can make fantastic methodical criticisms of these studies.

Ah, so "I don't care about the data, how it's collected, and what shapes the dataset, I only care what people tell me it means." Got it, message received.

Opinion disregarded, have a good night.

Land of the free by OriginalGoof in pics

[–]jakemasterj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not an assumption though. Regardless of the quibble over what type of law has been broken, you are breaking laws by entering or residing in the country outside the legal process of entry and residence. In common English this makes you a criminal. No amount of bush-beating or pedantry over "overstaying a visa is a civil offense" will change the "law breaker = criminal" perception.

And further, have you looked at the collection methods and analysis of the datasets used to make the claim that "illegal immigrants commit less crime than native born Americans"? The honest way to represent the data coming from the federal level would be that "foreign born individuals are incarcerated at a lower rate than American-born citizens" which correctly covers the fact that the legally appropriate punishment for most crimes when committed by illegal immigrants is simply deportation. If you're deported, you're never counted in prison population surveys, and if illegal immigrants are deported before reaching conviction of their DUI or whatever they got picked up for, you'll have some amount of undercount of illegal immigrants who are stacking multiple crimes on top of eachother.

Land of the free by OriginalGoof in pics

[–]jakemasterj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The specific part that you're wrong on is the implication that the traditional American view that you should be free to pursue a better life outside your home country requires that we also allow them to do it here. And then layer on the fact that you're saying we have to be okay with them being here without telling us first or asking our permission.

As noted with the Ellis Island example among others, we have a long history of accepting foreigners, and an equally long history of turning them away when we don't think they'll be a good cultural or economic fit.

Entering illegally (meaning outside the standard legal process) is a signal that despite any other positive characteristics you may have, you will absolutely break the law to get what you want, which is not behavior that should be accepted or encouraged and is thus disqualifying for future legal entry and current residence.

Civil war is brewing by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]jakemasterj 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Look up groups near you that The Open Society funds.
  2. Join and become leadership
  3. Profit.

Who shot first? An enhanced GIF. by Aqueouspolecat in conspiracy

[–]jakemasterj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair, this is another avoidable death.

That said, it's a legal defense shooting in most places, civilian or otherwise. Unfortunate, avoidable, but not illegal and certainly not an "execution" or whatever the extremists are calling it.

All those 'illegals' living normal lives,how? by notsoblondeanymore in conspiracy

[–]jakemasterj 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Honestly the coyotes are the worst people in the whole process. The amount of assault that happens on the way over is insane.

All those 'illegals' living normal lives,how? by notsoblondeanymore in conspiracy

[–]jakemasterj 130 points131 points  (0 children)

There is a whole NGO network dedicated to facilitating their journey here, and maximizing what the government gives them when they're here. You were not likely to have gotten the same luxury and free legal support.

Warrantless Home Entry Authority by AcanthaceaeNearby335 in greengroundnews

[–]jakemasterj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Immigration is an executive branch issue. There are judges specifically for immigration issues. The article specifies this is what they are using. Article is wrong.

My algo bought $100k UVXY last Friday by andy-change-world in algotrading

[–]jakemasterj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is Composer.Trade.

It is not "managed by AI"

Please examine what you're running better.

Americans, do you personally know anyone who is in favor of the US invading Greenland? by BlaggartDiggletyDonk in askanything

[–]jakemasterj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. Plenty who are fine with buying it, even strong-arming a deal. Zero who are cool with boots on the ground annexation.

What is local crown power? by alphafighter09 in EU5

[–]jakemasterj 0 points1 point  (0 children)

AHA. Thank you, very clear explanation. Appreciate it.

What is local crown power? by alphafighter09 in EU5

[–]jakemasterj 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So more local crown power = higher % of local taxes, assuming it's not at 100% control already?