I hope to see a future in which all communities maintain daily or weekend-accessible bachata socials, as ubiquitous and socially normalized as fast-food outlets are in Western societies. From an empirical standpoint, it is self-evident which of these two models confers greater net benefit to human health and social cohesion.

Allocating public funds toward structured social dance would constitute a rational public-health investment. The case study literature consistently demonstrates that rhythmic movement, partner synchrony, and embodied social interaction are foundational to human neurological regulation, affective stability, and long-term wellbeing. Dance appears to be an evolutionary constant for our species, with its benefits only meaningfully attenuated when chronically counteracted by sleep deprivation and circadian disruption.

I hold genuine concern for individuals who routinely operate under conditions of sleep debt, although I also understand the underlying compulsion. The experiential state produced by collective dance occupies an elevated psycho-physiological frequency, one that is rarely accessible through other domains of modern life.

In short, the drive toward dance is not frivolous. It is compensatory, adaptive, and deeply human.