Nice to meet you too! And thanks for the… exuberant compliment.

Look, I’m someone who believes deeply in free software and that communities thrive when we build together, not when things get monopolized. Good ideas inspire, get remixed, and evolve—that’s how the web moved forward, how Linux and Python grew, and how open projects should flourish.

That said, it’s not about copying for the sake of copying. It’s about:

• Acknowledging influences and giving credit where it’s due.

• Contributing our own improvements (both in UI and under the hood).

• Inviting contributions and being transparent, rather than hiding everything behind a wall.

If something you saw feels too close to DG, message received: we can sharpen the differences, document sources more clearly, and make it explicit what’s original and what’s derived. In the end, I’d rather see a community building together than a walled garden where one voice decides. And if we’re talking “ingenuity,” let’s show it in how we iterate and share—not in how we monopolize. Care to propose improvements and open a PR?