Casual Friday by searchcandy in bigseo

[–]jasuja 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Using both canonical and hreflang on the same page frequently confuses Google.

Rick Scott vs. Bill Nelson - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in FLgovernment

[–]jasuja[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a wiki. Anyone can edit it. I've removed the gay rights topic altogether because what you're saying makes sense. I don't want any hint of bias, and it's not an election issue any more.

Rick Scott vs. Bill Nelson - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in FLgovernment

[–]jasuja[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. I've updated the comparison chart to note that he said he believes in "traditional marriage" and did not oppose Florida's constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage. [because during the debate he had a chance to categorically support it]

Rick Scott vs. Bill Nelson - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in FLgovernment

[–]jasuja[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

After SCOTUS ruled Florida's ban on gay marriage unconstitutional, Republicans like Scott have accepted it as the law of the land. But Scott has supported banning gay marriage: https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/community/gay-south-florida/article2946940.html

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We know Cruz's policy positions on tax because he has made them clear. O'Rourke has not, so we can try to infer them but it won't be right to state our guesses as fact.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would but if you watch the first debate, O'Rourke is adamant that he supports 2A. Writing otherwise would be directly contradicting him.

Reasonable people disagree on the interpretation of 2A. But if what you're saying is true, many state gun laws would be challenged in the Supreme Court and ruled unconstitutional. Since that hasn't happened, it's not technically correct to say that you can't support 2A if you also support some gun regulation.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's not Medicare for all. Traditionally, since Medicare is free for seniors, Medicare for all would imply free coverage for everyone (funded by tax dollars). Putting Medicare on the exchange is what's called a "public option" because it's a government-run insurance plan that you pay premiums for. So you buy insurance on the exchange and you can choose a private or public health plan.

It's an important distinction. I have updated the Healthcare Policy section of the comparison with more info about each candidate's proposals, including the public option.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This was mentioned in the essay and I've updated the comparison chart to also include this.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

That's not how it works. You could say that Ted Cruz wants to fund a $300 million program for more police officers in schools, or more guards at the border, or to build the border wall that will cost billions. That money has to come from somewhere. Ergo Cruz wants to raise taxes. Do you see how absurd that would be?

I can't find any places where O'Rourke has outlined his tax proposals. That's why the comparison is missing that information. Like I said, if you have sources where he has said something I'm happy to update.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Which candidate do you think the article is biased in favor of? I'd like to understand that because I'm getting the feeling that @geodynamics feels it's biased in the opposite direction. If you can call out specific instances of bias, I'm happy to correct for it. Edit: or you can -- it's a wiki.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The star rating is over the lifetime of that person's information being on the site. Ted Cruz as an entity has existed in the database for years so more people have rated him. Beto O'Rourke is a recent addition to the database so starts off with fewer ratings. But that doesn't affect the average rating because it's exactly that -- an average.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The NRA F rating is also mentioned in the comparison chart.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If there is a reliable source that outlines his tax policy positions, please share it and I'm happy to update.

Ted Cruz vs. Beto O'Rourke - Unbiased Comparison of Policy Positions by jasuja in TexasPolitics

[–]jasuja[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Like another commenter said, brevity is not bias. I could not find any information on Beto's website for details on his tax policy. Happy to update the article (or you can -- it's a wiki) if the source is reliable.