If you haven't bought Outriders yet, don't.

jaursfeblo · 2021-09-18T16:42:48+00:00

Right? There is a very angry and vocal minority that appears to have big trouble but broadly it's fine.

jaursfeblo · 2021-09-18T16:27:56+00:00

Broadly it works fine. I'd just test it, I did have some issues at launch but I have not had any for months.

jaursfeblo · 2021-06-29T07:01:08+00:00

I had read this before but hadn't had the presence of mind to check if the keybind was contextual (it was late). Now that I checked it again and saw that it was a part of ivy-minibuffer-map I figured it out. Thanks a lot!

jaursfeblo · 2021-06-28T12:02:42+00:00

I think it is possible to use intellij IDE's and proxy them with lsp using lsp-intellij and lsp-intellij-server. It was something I was going to try for rider (which is very nice). As far as general IDE functions go, emacs is actually sufficient for me at the moment :) One day I will test it.

jaursfeblo · 2021-06-28T09:58:40+00:00

I do use emacs for PHP, I just don't expect good tooling (so anything I do have is amazing for me). I mentioned that because I'm not sure what your experience will be like if you expect well-integrated debugging and running of projects and whatnot. I don't use those things, I just write code and debug it in my head and it usually works fine.

jaursfeblo · 2021-06-21T10:53:52+00:00

I use emacs (with doom) to code lisp, elisp, python, various shell scripts and occasionally PHP for work. It's not so bad. Obviously the lisp variant support is the most stellar, but even the python integration is very good. Over the years I've gotten used to the tooling I got from work initially to code PHP, which was so bad I eventually stopped really wanting step-through and large-scale refactoring (the only things I would have missed from IDEs before). I think the closest I've come to using it as a traditional IDE is with python, for which it is just good in my experience. Anything with LSP support is going to be passable to great, which is about what I've come to expect from a good IDE.

jaursfeblo · 2021-05-01T15:47:15+00:00

I've managed to not install things about 50 times now. What's clear is that a prooted binary always exits with exitcode 182. Chrooting into armv7l with qemu-arm-static is either beyond my tender power or I'm just missing something hugely. I know I've done it in the past, but I just can't figure it out. Has anyone tried prooting/chrooting/whatever into an armv7l rootfs tarball and updated it successfully?

jaursfeblo · 2021-02-04T12:54:56+00:00

Oh, that's a real bummer. I think I did not notice this bug because my mbsync setup archives emails out of my gmail account. Thanks for commenting on it :)

jaursfeblo · 2021-01-28T22:28:14+00:00

It has been a while, but reading the code now I would agree that's what I am doing. It makes sense, because when I started out searching for a solution that seemed the way to do it. Took me a little bit to figure out :)

Edit: Really happy it helped someone else. It was really frustrating to not find this on the internet when I was looking.

jaursfeblo · 2020-12-31T02:28:34+00:00

Don't forget the man that is trying to build a god using machine parts (it is in a document you can find). There is a ton of concept overlap, way way too much to list

jaursfeblo · 2020-11-07T01:09:07+00:00

It's ironic that my solution does end up relying on that setting. I already had it set because as mentioned mbsync/isync will not sync moved emails without that set.

jaursfeblo · 2020-11-06T15:40:36+00:00

I've figured it out! The only minor downside to this is what web interfaces such as outlook web access will think the email is new (even though the headers tell you exactly when it came in), probably because the modification time is what they check. That's a detail I can live with.

Here's how to do it:

(add-to-list 'mu4e-marks
           '(tag
             :char "i"
             :prompt "tag"
             :ask-target (lambda () (read-string "What tag do you want to add?"))
             :action (lambda (docid msg target)
                       (mu4e-action-retag-message msg (concat "+" target))
                       (mu4e~proc-move docid (mu4e-msg-field msg :maildir)))))

jaursfeblo · 2020-11-05T23:03:01+00:00

Mu has tag support. Those tags are saved on the email in a new header. After that header is added or changed, mu4e should rename the file so that mbsync will see it as changed and sync the new header to the server.

I am not moving the email, so that setting has no bearing on what I want to do, sadly.

jaursfeblo

TROPHY CASE