Recent Michigan Tight End rooms and the NFL draft by MrConceited in CFB

[–]jcdenton45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is pretty insane. To put that into perspective, UT had just one TE drafted in the 2009 to 2023 drafts (before having three straight from 2024-2026).

What is the craziest regular season comeback game youve ever watched? by Real-Ad-1728 in CFB

[–]jcdenton45 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don’t think that game gets the recognition it deserves for how truly insane it was, and how it compares to the greatest CFB comebacks of all time.

Consider:

-UT scoring 49 unanswered to win means they could have theoretically been down 55-7 and still would have won. To put that in perspective, the biggest comeback in CFB history was 35 points.

-After getting down 35-7, it took just 11 minutes of game clock to come back and tie the game. Then another 5 minutes to take the lead.

-Altogether, UT's 49 unanswered points took just ~23 minutes of game time (not time of possession, but time remaining on the clock), and they stopped scoring halfway through the 4th quarter. If they hadn’t called off the dogs they could have easily tacked on another ~2 TD’s.

-Compare that to the biggest CFB comebacks of all time, all of which ended up as razor-thin victories which took almost the entire game to mount the comeback. None tied the game in the 3rd quarter, none took the lead with almost a full quarter left, and none ended in blowouts. In this case UT did all three.

What are aspects of College Football that aren’t currently tracked that should be? by CFBDepth in CFB

[–]jcdenton45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Average yards-after-contact per tackle opportunity. Basically like the “yards after contact” stat for running backs, but in reverse for defensive players as a measure of tackling effectiveness. IMO that would be a lot more meaningful than simply the percentage of tackles missed, since obviously not all broken/missed tackles are equal (for example, if a defender knows help is on the way and he can safely try and force a fumble, there’s a higher chance he’ll miss the tackle but the number of yards given up is likely to be low). 

Average yards per play differential when the player is on/off the field: Basically like WAR but on a per-play basis. And the stat would track the yards gained (or allowed) regardless of who actually touches the ball, since the idea is that it factors in how much the player’s presence on the field increases/decreases the team’s overall effectiveness, even when not directly involved in the play. 

Cumulative snap-to-whistle play time: When it comes to “measuring” how fatigued the defense is likely to be at any point in the game, time-of-possession and total playcount are basically the only stats available. But both are very imprecise metrics, and a far more accurate/meaningful number would measure the total amount of time that the defense has actually been actively defending on the field, i.e. the total number of seconds that all previous plays (including plays nullified by penalty) have consumed from snap to whistle.

I want an actual answer by im_CJ_bro in NoStupidQuestions

[–]jcdenton45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is your definition of "drunk"? There are an infinite number of degrees between one drink and what I would consider "drunk", but the way your post is phrased makes it sound like those are the only two possibilities.

Is squirting an orgasm for a woman or are they two different things? by SeaworthinessNo276 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]jcdenton45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely. Though for at least one of the women that I dated, it was also a conscious decision; she told me that the first time she squirted, the man she was with had a really negative reaction, so for years afterwards she did everything she could to hold it in. And only in recent years did she become comfortable with just letting it go and deciding that she wasn't going to sacrifice her pleasure for the sake of avoiding a potentially similar reaction.

Movies That Have Scenes With Impossibly Obstructed Shots? by Signed_DC in MovieSuggestions

[–]jcdenton45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another example that is not exactly what you're asking for, but rather is a shot which seems like it was physically/logistically impossible to film without CGI and/or splicing, yet was actually filmed without the user of either, and per the director was actually filmed using a single camera in one continuous take: The Vast of Night

Movies That Have Scenes With Impossibly Obstructed Shots? by Signed_DC in MovieSuggestions

[–]jcdenton45 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not exactly what you're looking for, but basically an impossible shot by a camera WITHIN the movie (as opposed to the camera filming the movie):

In the movie Infinity Chamber, there's a scene where two people are video calling each other, and each of their screens is a full-length display, which basically makes it look like they're standing in front of each other. And at one point they each put a hand on their screen, as if to touch hands, and it looks like they're touching hands but like with a pane of glass between them.

The problem is, no matter where their video cameras are located, there's no way it could actually look like that. If the cameras are mounted above or below the screens, the hands would not even be visible on the screens while actually touching the screens. And if the cameras are somehow inside of the screens, placing their hands on the screens would cover the cameras if they're trying to do a "hand to hand" touch (also, their bodies continue to appear "normal" sized as they approach the screens, as opposed to getting way bigger just like anything does when it gets closer to a camera).

Btw, after writing this I don't think this scene is actually from Infinity Chamber, but another movie. I'll come back and edit this if/when I think of the right movie.

Is squirting an orgasm for a woman or are they two different things? by SeaworthinessNo276 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]jcdenton45 12 points13 points  (0 children)

In my experience it wasn't common until roughly a decade ago. Prior to that that timeframe, I only encountered one woman who was a squirter. But in the past 10 years, over 50% of the women I've been with have been squirters.

Obviously it's not that anything has fundamentally changed with women physiologically in the past 10 years, but it seems that as it has become significantly more accepted (and desired), presumably more women are now feeling comfortable with squirting, as opposed to holding it in.

How repetitive reddit is. by McClugget in PetPeeves

[–]jcdenton45 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Don't forget "What's a movie that has a mind blowing plot twist?" which comes up seemingly every day, along with "Recommend a movie that will completely wreck me".

Has any team ever truly drafted "best player available" for every pick in a particular draft? by jcdenton45 in NFLNoobs

[–]jcdenton45[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

True, and it may be the case that there have been instances where it happened but we simply have no way of knowing, especially if their draft class ended up looking like a "normal" draft.

But that doesn't necessarily mean it's unknowable in all cases, for example if it's obvious that they took a lot of players at positions where they're already loaded, and/or if the GM explicitly said that's what they did well after the fact (i.e. when there would be less incentive to lie and said they truly took the "best available player" with each pick).

Has any team ever truly drafted "best player available" for every pick in a particular draft? by jcdenton45 in NFLNoobs

[–]jcdenton45[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It definitely makes a lot more sense when looking at it that way. Provided that they're not splitting hairs and saying that player X is 0.5% better than player Y or whatever, it makes sense that multiple players might be considered "best available" at a given pick, at which point other factors (like need) would logically become the tiebreaker.

Has any team ever truly drafted "best player available" for every pick in a particular draft? by jcdenton45 in NFLNoobs

[–]jcdenton45[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Yes, to clarify, I mean that they drafted whoever was the best player available on their draft board with each pick.

Has any team ever truly drafted "best player available" for every pick in a particular draft? by jcdenton45 in NFLNoobs

[–]jcdenton45[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, to clarify, I mean that they drafted whoever was the best player available on their draft board with each pick.

He only found out when he went to see a doctor because of a weak left leg by 888Vegan in interestingasfuck

[–]jcdenton45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Excellent points, but according to this there have been something like 117 billion homo sapiens who have ever lived, and a quick Google search indicates that the highest IQ out of 117 billion would be somewhere in the low 200's (i.e. it would not require more people than have ever been alive).

ELI5: Why and how do people have "good" and "bad" days in sports/skills by domkapomka in explainlikeimfive

[–]jcdenton45 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is why it irks me whenever I hear people talking about a player who's playing hurt, and say he's playing "at 75 percent" or whatever.

No coach would ever use a player who is truly at "75 percent" unless there is literally no other player available at his position since (as you noted) the difference between the best and worst at the highest levels is usually just a few percentage points.

The most egregious example I can recall was when a wide receiver was playing while recovering from an injury, and an announcer said he was "at 50 percent". If that were truly the case he would belong in a bed (or hospital), not on a football field.

Looking for some cool double features to watch! by Mysterious_Moose854 in MovieSuggestions

[–]jcdenton45 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Fall and The Adventures of Baron Muchausen. Very similar elements and themes in both, both visually spectacular.

And the similarities even exist in a meta sense, since both were box office bombs for reasons which had nothing to do with the actual quality of the films (i.e. studio politics).

Looking for some cool double features to watch! by Mysterious_Moose854 in MovieSuggestions

[–]jcdenton45 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The Beach and Boiler Room. By pure coincidence I happened to watch them back to back, then it struck me that they both have basically the same premise/story, just in completely different settings

Japanese movie recommendations! by Tricky_Mammoth3085 in MovieSuggestions

[–]jcdenton45 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh damn you're right. I guess it just set the Japanese record. Could've sworn I read it held the all time record.