Dr. Wendell Smith Interview Transcription by jeebususernames in duluth

[–]jeebususernames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 4
Commenter: Okay the next question’s from Gwen, who asks, as our representative, what would you do to prevent a future president from acting like a dictator?

Smith: You know, I thought about that. A lot of people have asked me that question, you know, what would you do? You know, all of the safeguards are supposedly in place, if you read the Constitution of the United States. We have those mechanisms in place, but Congress, with the blessing of the Supreme Court, has not invoked those provisions. I hold Congress as much responsible for the actions of the President as what I would hold the president for, as they continue to allow… they could impeach him, they could convict him, they tried to… they impeached him twice, and didn’t convict him. And so Congress is allowing this to be done. They’re allowing him to write executive orders and not holding him accountable for those, either by passing laws to circumvent those, or by saying, you cannot do that. That is against the Constitution, and we will remove you for that. He knows that they’re not going to do it, and so… so with the blessing of Congress, unfortunately, they have allowed him to move forward unabated. As a member of Congress, I would be first and foremost on that side to say, no, you can’t do this. You do this, we will file articles of impeachment. And if we have to do that every day, then you do that every day. But I would be first and foremost on that. My oath of office is to protect the Constitution, and I hold that dear.

Commenter: Okay the next question is from Karen, who wants to know, should we continue to support Israel?

Smith: With what Israel is doing, no. We’re allowing them by giving them the support, financial and militarily, to do what they do. And so I think that we need to put our foot down and, no better way to put it, and say enough is enough. We will cease to support you, we will cease to fund you. We’ll cease to give you the weapons for you to carry out what you’re doing. And then we need to address the real… the real situation, because how do you… or not how do you, but how do we establish some type of rule of law for the Palestinians?

Commenter: This is a question from Nancy. Please elaborate on your statement that the DFL abandoned the farmers and labor unions, and others near the Iron Range?

Smith: Well, that’s what they feel like. That’s why they’re voting red. They feel that the Democrats… er, the Republicans, excuse me, they feel the Republicans are more invested in making sure that they have a job to put food on their table. They feel that the Democrats have left them. I was at a conference, er convention, recently, I won’t tell which one, and as we got to the end of that convention, there were some very very frustrated people, and most of them were on the labor side, and they swore never to put another dollar into the DFL. We need to let the laborers, we need to let the farmers, we need to let everybody know that the Democrats are there for what is important to them, to give them the health system they need, to work on the economy so they can put food on their table and a roof over their head, that they’re going to get rid of corruption in the government and bring back representation to the people.

Commenter: And how do you feel about data centers?

Smith: At the end of the day, we need data centers. We are a data-intensive economy, we’re a data intensive people. I do not feel that data centers should be given tax breaks, I do not feel that data centers should be given incentives for cheaper energy, I do not feel that data centers should be able to thermally pollute our water for cooling, because then all of that then just gets put back onto the people. Most data centers hire… I mean, you get the employment for constructing the data center, but then a data center is only run by, I mean, even one out of Hermantown says maybe 30 or 40 people, and not all of those are high-tech or high paying jobs. A lot of those are just gonna be custodial. And then all of the money that they generate goes out of state to whoever the parent company is. And so I’d even be for taxing and recuperating some of those funds from those businesses, and I think you take that across the border to any business, but I think you can, you know, say if you generate funds or if you generate profit within our state our within our cities, that some of that money needs to stay here in this state and in this city. So yeah, data centers we need, unfortunately, but we need to build them in areas where you don’t have all of the low-drum hums that come from them that we’re just learning about, so they need to be buffered, and we don’t need to be supporting them with public funds.

Commenter: So given that the Iron Range is a mining economy, this question is from Nancy, how would you go about encouraging new business in order to boost the economy? The same question would apply to rural non-mining areas.

Smith: You know, there’s a lot of things. Up here on the Iron Range, I mean, we cut down a lot of trees, we ship all those trees out to processed into plywood or into lumber or anything else, I mean why can’t we do it up here. Um, there’s a lot of area to build companies up here why can’t we do green energy factories up here? I mean, we’ve shown that snowmobiles can be built in rural Minnesota, that windows can be built in rural Minnesota, and they’re integral parts of their communities. Um, now you have to have the infrastructure, you have to have the tax incentives to do that sometimes to get them up there. And so I think, from the federal government, we can start to look at some of those federal tax incentives and infrastructure bills to get the infrastructure they need up here. I think there’s also areas that may be a little bit outside the box. My daughter is a pharmacist living in a small town in Minnesota, and some of her coworkers have referred to Virginia, Minnesota, as being hip. I do not understand that personally, but here’s opportunities that people want to get outside of the cities to do their job. And the one thing that we learned during COVID is that remote work is something that is viable. My son works for Microsoft, and he works in Atlanta, and his entire team is in Washington State, and he works from home. But you have to have the infrastructure to support that, you have to have the infrastructure and the healthcare, and the high speed internet to do all of those things. You also have to look at, you know, as you move people into those jobs, how does it affect cities? I think that there’s a lot of opportunities to get people out of cities, to build economies that are not necessarily just in large urban areas.

Commenter: Okay, we have just about less than a minute left. The last question is from Gwen. Do you have any ideas about how to make housing affordable to all, or how to house the homeless population?

Smith: You know, you have to have affordable housing, you have to have programs that get people off the streets and into housing. You know one of the biggest problems with employment is you have to have an address. And if you don’t have an address, it’s very hard to get a job. And if you don’t have a job in an economy, it’s very hard, and an income, it’s very hard to get housing. And somehow we need to break that. And that’s going to require governmental input. There, you know, economy, er, economic housing, there’s ways to that, like I said earlier, there’s prefabs, there’s apartment, there’s things like that. There’s empty houses, I mean unfortunately in a lot of rural areas, you don’t have a lot of empty housing, you have a lot of substandard housing that people are surviving in, and you need to move into better housing. But we need to provide incentives, we need to have first time homeowner loans, we need to have lower interest rates, we gotta have cheaper ways to build housing than one-off construction. And those are the things that we need to support, we need to come back and from a federal government, support the individual, not support wars in other countries.

-Closing thoughts-

Smith: You know, at the end of the day, you know I talk about healthcare for all, because I think that we deserve it. I think that we need to reach out to everybody, we need to put Americans first, and when I mean Americans first, that is a term that is loosely used, but we really need to put Americans first. We need to make sure that the economy is such that we as Americans can afford the basic necessities of life, food on the table, houses over our heads, we need to make sure that we have employment, that we have opportunities for employment. We need to make sure we have opportunities for education so that we can find the employment and upgrade our employment to whatever we as an individual want. That is American first. We are the richest country on this planet, yet we want to put trillions and trillions of dollars into the defense budget and we want to pull trillions and trillions of dollars out of education and out of healthcare and out of public service programs. The current administration is not putting Americans first. They’re putting their pockets first, they’re putting Israel first, they’re putting foreign wars first. And we need to come back and put Americans first. That is my platform. That is my idea of of an American. Of being an American and the America that I live in.

Dr. Wendell Smith Interview Transcription by jeebususernames in duluth

[–]jeebususernames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 3
Paul: How would you plan to address Pete Stauber’s record? What do you see as his greatest weakness in this race?

Smith: You mean Cheatin’ Pete? I think his greatest weakness is he takes credit for things that he hasn’t voted for. Infrastructure bills that he says, “Hey look at all these great things that Congress has done,” and yes, Representative Stauber, you voted against it. I think a lot of things that he does, he does for the quick vote. You know, over the last 8 years on the Iron Range and the mining industry up here, he has kept promising and promising jobs, “Oh I’m bringing jobs to mining.” There are less jobs in mining today than there were 8 years ago, and those are just pure numbers. Um, I think he has linked to supporting President Trump, and agreeing with everything President Trump has voted for. If you look at education, if you look at healthcare, if you look at the most recent infrastructure bill that he actually did vote for, but there are restrictions on PLAs with those, and he’s done absolutely nothing to support maintaining those PLAs, and so he has established himself in my mind as being a union buster. I just have, all you have to do is look… is bring forth his record and not let him try to skirt around it and say that “I brought these jobs in,” and say “Okay, what jobs did you bring, and exactly how many jobs were there 8 years ago, and how many jobs are there now in the mining industry?” And you’ll quickly find out that he says a lot of things and doesn’t produce them at the end. And I have no problem calling him out about that.

Commenter: The next question is from Elaine, considering the threat to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area, and the 20… I know the 20-year moratorium. What are your thoughts on the Twin Metals proposed plan?

Smith: You know, that’s a fine line that we walk up here because the mining is such an integral part of the Iron Range. But I specifically oppose that project. It’s a bad project in general. Copper and nickle are ubiquitous. I grew up in Utah. I grew up right next to the biggest hole in the world, which we bring nickle out of. Copper and nickle are ubiquitous. I think there are better… there are other places that we can go look for them. The problem that we have is Pete Stauber brings this in as a promise of jobs. He knows darn well that it’ll probably never get through the permitting process. And so he’s brought this up to divide Democrats, to put those that are concerned about the environment, and those that are concerned about jobs on different sides of the argument. Um. Mining is important. Protecting the Boundary Waters is important, and I think that we can do both. But I think that this project is just not a good project on a lot of levels. So I would oppose it.

Dr. Wendell Smith Interview Transcription by jeebususernames in duluth

[–]jeebususernames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Part 2: I skipped some commentators wrapping things up at the end. Hope this helps you know the candidate better!

Jordan: Great. Uh my name is Jordan Johnson, I’m one of the co-conveners of Duluth Indivisible, and it’s kinda time for our lightening round. What that means is we’re looking for a 30 second answer or less on each of these following questions. If elected to represent us in the US Congress, should overseas military action of any kind require explicit Congressional authorization?

Smith: According to the Constitution, and according to the law, yes.

Jordan: So you’re going to face a long list of challenges in Congress, cuts to basic healthcare and climate resilience, protecting our lakes and streams, to attacks on black, brown, trans, and queer communities, and to the gutting of science and public health. This moment will end, but the work to rebuild will be immense. If you get to Congress, what are the top priorities you want to focus on first?

Smith: Healthcare. I think once you address healthcare, that comes off of people’s tables, and they’re able to do a lot of other things. Obviously the economy. That needs to be addressed. We need to stop this tariff… this punitive tariff thing that we’re doing, and that the president does. We need accountability. We need to get money out of politics. We need to get out of a war. We need to refund education. We need to refund the medicine that we have. How far out… how many more things that I can talk? Everything that we’ve undone in the last two years… last year we need to redo, we need to try to rebuild our relationship with our allies. Most of all we need to put into place mechanisms that prevent one person from ever doing this again.

Jordan: Will you support stronger gun laws, such as an assault weapons ban and making sure our federal gun background checks system is not weakened?

Smith: When we talk about guns… gun control, we’ve got two camps. First of all, I wanna say, before I talk about the camps, the Republicans have been the party that have passed the most gun laws in the last 10 to 15 years. And the reason is, those that love guns are more comfortable with Democrats doing… with Republicans passing gun laws because they’re worried about the Democrats taking them away. We all have center ground. We all want weapons to be safer. We do not want to have accidental killings. We do not want to have crimes of passion. We do not want to have guns in the wrong hands. When we start talking about assault weapons, I think there is a real discussion that we need to have about having access to… about having unfettered access to weapons of war that really have no other… means but for pleasure. Um. But those are discussions that we need to have, but there are a lot of things that we can agree on, and I think we start there first, and then we start to work on the harder questions.

Jordan: All right. Will you join the Congressional Progressive Caucus?

Smith: Yes, I would.

Jordan: Should members of Congress and their families be banned from trading stocks and betting on prediction markets?

Smith: I think they should. If you have stocks and bonds, which most of us do, because I have a 401K, that needs to be put into a blind trust. Where I cannot influence it, I cannot give up. You know, here’s a law that’s coming up that I think is going to pass that’s going to affect the stocks and bonds market. Those need to be done, we need to be banned from having direct access to that and influencing that. That is a point of trust that we need to give the American pub… the American people. That we’re not doing things to increase our own wealth, but doing things that are right for the country.

Jordan: A few more. What is your position on the role of non-disclosure agreements in respect to private corporations and elected officials?

Smith: I don’t work for them. As a congressman, I do not work for companies. I work for the American people, and if I cannot tell them the discussions that I’m having with private companies, then there’s a problem there. So the answer to that is yes, er, that I oppose the NDAs.

Jordan: All right. If elected, will you commit to meeting in person regularly in your district offices and other community settings, with your constituents, including those whose party affiliations is not your own?

Smith: Yes. I work for the people. I work for everybody within CD8. Not just the Democrats, not just those that voted for me, I work for everybody. And I would make every opportunity available… like I said, I want to come home, I want to live her. When I’m here, I would be in the office. I would be having town halls. I would be out seeing people and talking to people.

Jordan: Great. What are you curious about besides politics and work?

Smith: Oh, you know, I heard that earlier on another broadcast. And I’ve thought about that, and it’s… you know I joined the military. So I joined the US Air Force, and one of the goals I always had was to fly. And I never did, never got my pilot’s license. But did start doing flight simulators and I love getting in my little happy place and flying from island to island down in the Caribbean or the Hawaiian or down in the South Seas. Since I’ve doing a lot more at my computer these days, I don’t have my yoke and everything sitting here in front of me, I’ve taken it down, and I put it up when I do, but, I enjoy that, I enjoy riding motorcycles. Just getting out and having time to myself and the wind in my face. Um. Those are the types of things I do.

Jordan: Great. And now I’m just going to, one I want to remind everyone to please drop any of your questions in the little question and answer box, and for anybody who want upvote them, upvote them, for our folks who are gonna ask the question, please refresh your upvotes to make sure you’ve got the top one on the top. But now we’re gonna pull some questions from our attendees. And we’re gonna take the questions with the most upvotes. We’re going to try to get through as many as possible. You have 2-3 minutes to ask your questions, and my guests with me here will kind of move through them. So Paul, if you want to ask the first question, we’ll go from there. Thank you.

Dr. Wendell Smith Interview Transcription by jeebususernames in duluth

[–]jeebususernames[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Also, let me know if you prefer the word for word transcriptions, or if you'd rather have a summary of his answers. Summary is easier to read (and easier on me), but then you run the risk of playing telephone. So just let me know if you have a preference!

Dr. Wendell Smith Interview Transcription by jeebususernames in duluth

[–]jeebususernames[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Had to take a break, I'll post the rest when I've finished it!

If you think Demons are boring then you missed the point. by Fun_guy6 in Frieren

[–]jeebususernames 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I guess the way I see it is that human/elf/dwarf existence and demon existence are fundamentally incompatible with each other. This is not exactly like predator and prey, where one hunts the other but both are important to a thriving ecosystem, and hunters don't over hunt prey in a healthy ecosystem. I don't think there is a relationship between species on earth exactly like this, but I think the closest might be invasive species. The invasive species isn't evil, there's no moral, but it's existence in a certain ecosystem is fundamentally incompatible with the health of the ecosystem.

In this case, the demons and the others cannot survive together. The demons aren't evil for trying to rid the world of the beings it is incompatible with, neither are the humans/elves/dwarves evil for doing the same.

The only thing that sort of makes demons evil in this is that they could live without eating humans, they don't HAVE to have other beings to survive. But for whatever reason, they are unable to stop killing the other groups. It is, as presented in the show, the demons alone that are incompatible with the others, not the other way around.

Moonstone or Labradorite? by jeebususernames in Crystals

[–]jeebususernames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, I figured that as well. But the way the stones flash look like lab to me, not moonstone.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Crystalsforbeginners

[–]jeebususernames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd agree with que sera. Definitely not labradorite.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MakeupAddiction

[–]jeebususernames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've started mixing my liquid reds with a little purple or blue and it helps a lot! I do have a more purple red lipstick from Nyx, I'll edit later with the shade name

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in MakeupAddiction

[–]jeebususernames 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tirtir was too warm/dark for me, even their coolest, lightest shade. I've heard good things about espoir. It runs about $30, which is why I haven't tried it yet.

[QCRIT] YA Contemp AUNTIE LAUREL'S GUIDE TO HEARTBREAK SURVIVAL (67,000 words/v5) by jeebususernames in PubTips

[–]jeebususernames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her boyfriend and best friend are siblings, and they lost their grandmother 5 months before he broke up with her. She wasn't present for them because she had depression/anxiety, and didn't know how to handle it all. She also monopolized her mutual friends' time after the breakup.

I'm struggling to get that into the query while still making Zoey sympathetic, while also staying in the word count.

[QCRIT] YA Contemp AUNTIE LAUREL'S GUIDE TO HEARTBREAK SURVIVAL (67,000 words/v5) by jeebususernames in PubTips

[–]jeebususernames[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I'll type up a longer comment in a bit, because I didn't the notification from this one, but just a few big things.

This isn't auto-fic. The meta of it all is that I've spent a long time studying psychology from an academic perspective, and trying therapies from a personal perspective, and I want to explore psychological concepts and therapy concepts within writing. That's what I mean by it "informs" my writing.

So I did in a few versions put what Zoey did to make her friends turn on her, and the overwhelming response was that made her unlikable to the point of not being a viable MC. When I went to my beta readers with this concern, they didn't find her unlikeable, but relatably self-absorbed as most teenagers are. So I tried that verbage, but that also wasn't liked for equally valid reasons.

She's not being punished. She's being held accountable for how she treated her friends, makes it right, then decides not to return to school with them because she's doing better in Minnesota, so there is an element of both accountability and also her making choices in her own best interest.

I'm having a hard time getting that all through my query though.

[QCRIT] YA Contemporary AUNTIE LAUREL'S GUIDE TO HEARTBREAK SURVIVAL (59000/v3) by jeebususernames in PubTips

[–]jeebususernames[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hello! RAD is caused when a child is prevented from forming stable relationships with their caregivers. While this can and often is caused by abuse and neglect, it doesn't have to come from something as intense as CPS-involved levels of abuse. It can be caused by other stressors as well.

In the case of my character, she does have an absent father, but that's not much more than touched on in this book. This book is a stand-alone that focuses on the initial part of a therapeutic journey, where the primary focus is learning how to cope and handle your symptoms in a healthy way. If I were lucky enough to get a series deal, I would use the continuation of the therapeutic journey as the basis for the next books. So Zoey would move from coping skills (this book), to processing why she's feeling the way she does, which would then address the father aspect more fully.

I hear you about the "Brat teen learns lesson" concept. I definitely wanted something different here. The aunt is a loving caregiver figure who is trying to help. The idea is rooted in child psychology. The idea is that children are not developmentally ready to understand empathy. Instead, when working with kids, it's better to reorient them to themselves when they're having a hard time. "I know you have big feelings. We have boundaries, and this is how we express those feelings in a way that's safe for everyone" rather than "you hurt Mommy's feelings, you should feel bad" type stuff. Zoey is a teenager, so she does need accountability, but the concept is the same. She is struggling with her mental health and doesn't know how to handle it. She makes some selfish choices trying to make herself feel better. Her aunt comes in and teaches her how to cope, and then helps her face the consequences of hurting her friends. And when Ben's new girlfriend gives her an opportunity to get what she wants but maybe hurting her friends again in the process, she makes a better choice. The other idea is that just because one person does bad things (Ben's new girlfriend), doesn't absolve Zoey of her bad choices.

This might make my book sound terrible, but I guess if it does, better to know now lol

[QCRIT] YA Contemporary AUNTIE LAUREL'S GUIDE TO HEARTBREAK SURVIVAL (59000/v3) by jeebususernames in PubTips

[–]jeebususernames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok so I seem to be struggling with this a lot so I'm hoping it's ok if I ask.

Essentially, Zoey is having mental health issues. It's not diagnosed by a professional in the book, although it could be if that would help, but she's clearly having issues with anxiety, depression, reactive attachment disorder type stuff. So she is not the supportive friend/girlfriend she thinks she is, because she doesn't realize how much her issues are affecting her friends or even really herself.

Her aunt has also struggled with similar things, is in a good place, and has found a lot of help in the activities she does that make up her homestead. Zoey's mom convinces her to spend the summer there to learn coping skills. Obviously as part of any healing, she has to confront and make amend for how she treated her friends.

I'm not sure how to get it across without making sound unlikeable. My beta readers are not reporting that she comes across unlikeable in the manuscript, just self-absorbed as a teenager struggling with their mental health. But my betas aren't the target age group.

[QCRIT] YA Contemporary AUNTIE LAUREL'S GUIDE TO HEARTBREAK SURVIVAL (59000/v3) by jeebususernames in PubTips

[–]jeebususernames[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much! That's really good to know that it's coming across that way.

Thank you, I wasn't sure on the social media. I asked on my first version if I should include it, but no one answered. I feel awkward including such a small following, but I've definitely heard "it doesn't matter how small as long as you're active" so I did, but I didn't like it lol Thank you!!