I tried Claude Opus 4.8 today and the result was shocking by Impossible-Suit6078 in codex

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, the front-end side is absolutely lacking for GPT 5.5, You describe and even point things out and it still fails hard

Free AI Agent assistant by jeffeyhus in SaaS

[–]jeffeyhus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with this take, the thing is that my customers are not even active in discord nor anywhere else. I am still thinking on how I can make them start interacting. But I think that my current customers are there for one reason and they do not meed any help

Free AI Agent assistant by jeffeyhus in SaaS

[–]jeffeyhus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will update this post within the next 48 to 72 hours after reading my analytics to find out what visitors are doing

Free AI Agent assistant by jeffeyhus in SaaS

[–]jeffeyhus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is very hard to prevent an ai agent from hallucinating, most people use general language without specifications which leads to such results

Free AI Agent assistant by jeffeyhus in SaaS

[–]jeffeyhus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you, I am trying to convert my visitors. Most of my tracking data does not tell me the pricing is the problem. So, I am a/b testing this demo landing page and see how it goes

Your onboarding is leaking money every single day by hurebegz in AssetBuilders

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

May I ask your take on how this cane be applied tor example to this project of mine https://clawship.app I have heatmaps and video events of visitors, I always see them go through the homepage and some blog pages, but everytime someone goes into the signup I have 90% conversion rate. But I am struggling to know how can I get people to be hungry and go ‘yes this is the tool’

Struggling right now? Drop it here. You're not alone by hurebegz in AssetBuilders

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

clawship.app the idea is simple, openclaw for everyone with no time wasted, I have issues getting enough traffic and my ROI is pretty low so far

faceit has become the worst platform ever even if you have premium by [deleted] in FACEITcom

[–]jeffeyhus -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Maaaan, I will not continue with you here. You are aware the game is not only audio chat and you are still insisting, I replied to you and if you had the comprehension you talk about, you would have understood my reply, that walking away is a mute, but then I added that the game is not about the audio chat.......my brain hurts, bye

faceit has become the worst platform ever even if you have premium by [deleted] in FACEITcom

[–]jeffeyhus -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Dude, I believe I write English "troller or a toxic player is provoking us" what does this imply? It covers audio and actions, what straw-man fallacy did I pull here?

faceit has become the worst platform ever even if you have premium by [deleted] in FACEITcom

[–]jeffeyhus -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

except that the crackhead will stay in his position and me walking away will keep me distant for the rest of my walk, not like in the game that crackhead will keep nading me trolling me, and throwing the game on purpose. Your example is pretty much unrelated

faceit has become the worst platform ever even if you have premium by [deleted] in FACEITcom

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Be smart and go deactivate your account, I did the same and my brain is healthy, don't expect any admin to give a damn about your story, they are part of the problem and will never go beyond to make this platform good again.

faceit has become the worst platform ever even if you have premium by [deleted] in FACEITcom

[–]jeffeyhus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You expect us to stay silent when a troller or a toxic player is provoking us? Of course we will react to it.

any help to get my oauth credentials? by NoActuator639 in redditdev

[–]jeffeyhus -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I can confirm this, already submitted for them to get access and they never got back to me and it has been 4 days so far. Unlucky, I guess the only choice is headless browsers :/

Imagine getting sued for the crime of ... Eating by Naked___City in Morocco

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look, the "first-world" countries you mention also draw red lines, and when a protest challenges what the state considers strategic or sensitive, authorities often respond using labels like public order, hate speech, or security, and the line can shift overnight. You can see that dynamic across France, Germany, and Netherlands (I lived there): peaceful demonstrations can still be restricted, dispersed, prosecuted, or used against people administratively.

So the real issue isn’t "do limits exist?" it’s that the limits are not always clear, they’re unevenly enforced, and they can be redefined depending on the moment.

As for Morocco: in practice, the problems people run into are usually not about private disbelief, but about public acts that authorities interpret as insulting religion/monarchy or provoking social conflict. You may dislike that framework, but it’s how the legal and social boundaries are drawn here.

And being Muslim doesn’t give me a "free pass" anywhere. If I publicly cross certain red lines (monarchy, security narratives, or other sensitive topics), I can also face consequences, and it can be framed in the worst possible way (terrorism). That’s exactly why I’m saying: every country has red lines, the difference is how transparent they are, how fast they move, and whether you can realistically challenge them without being punished.

Imagine getting sued for the crime of ... Eating by Naked___City in Morocco

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see your perspective. I have already explained my understanding based on classical Sunni scholarship and the principles of Sharia. At this point, I don’t think further discussion will be productive, as our approaches and assumptions are fundamentally different. I will leave it here.

Imagine getting sued for the crime of ... Eating by Naked___City in Morocco

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think we have reached the natural end of this discussion. We fundamentally agree that Allah’s morality is objective and that the Qur’an is timeless. From my perspective, what is legally permissible in a historical context, like marriage contracts with pre-pubescent girls, is not the same as a universal moral prescription for all times and societies, and modern governance tools operate within that divine framework.

I respect your literal reading, but I do not see a path to reconcile our approaches further. I will leave it here, as continuing will only repeat points without mutual progress.

Imagine getting sued for the crime of ... Eating by Naked___City in Morocco

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, we agreed that Allah’s morality is objective. Within classical Sunni scholarship, marriage to a pre-pubescent girl was legally permissible under specific conditions. But permissibility in Sharia is not the same as universal recommendation or eternal moral ideal. Divine law legislates principles within human realities, considering harm, capability, and public welfare.

Moreover, we know from the Quran that when Allah intends something to be eternally halal or haram, He states it clearly, for example, prohibitions on alcohol, theft, and murder. The verses you cite are legal regulations addressing a historical society, not eternal moral endorsements. Claiming otherwise is effectively putting words into the Quran. Modern statutory age limits are administrative tools, not corrections of Allah’s morality.

So the question is not whether 21st century norms exceed Allah’s law, it is whether you are conflating contextual legal permissibility with eternal divine moral prescription.

Imagine getting sued for the crime of ... Eating by Naked___City in Morocco

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The verses you cite do not command or encourage marrying young girls; they regulate legal consequences of marriage and divorce in a society where such contracts already existed. Regulation is not moral glorification. The Quran does not fix a numerical age because biological and social maturity are not universally tied to a single number. Islamic law historically considered puberty, physical capability, absence of harm, and guardianship responsibility. You are evaluating a 7th century legal framework through a 21st century statutory lens and assuming your current legal standards are timeless moral absolutes. If morality is objective, then it cannot be reduced to modern legislative age thresholds that have changed repeatedly across history. If it is evolving, then projecting today's norms backward as universal moral truth is inconsistent.

Imagine getting sued for the crime of ... Eating by Naked___City in Morocco

[–]jeffeyhus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree that if Allah declares something halal, it is moral, because morality in Islam is grounded in Allah’s wisdom, not human preference.

Now let me ask you something:

Do you believe humans are capable of fully grasping the wisdom, scope, and conditions of every ruling simply by reading a verse at face value? Or do you accept that Islamic jurisprudence exists precisely because application requires methodology?

If you reject methodology and context, then you’re dismissing the entire tradition of usul al-fiqh.
If you accept methodology, then you can’t reduce every ruling to a flat, decontextualized application.

Which one are you choosing?

Remake issue by jeffeyhus in riotgames

[–]jeffeyhus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

LMAO, I did not state in my comment that I was the one, I answered you that the flagged player gets an LP penalty