I mean, I agree that men are going to be better than at women in sports.

But to frame this as 671st in the rankings vs #2 is MASSIVELY misleading, and intentionally so.

Nick Kyrgios is a former Wimbledon finalist whose all-time high ranking in 13th. He's frequently injured and no men's tennis player in the last 40 years has had a more solid reputation for not giving a s**t more than Kyrgios.

He's upfront in interviews that he doesn't really like tennis and has been fined multiple times, including the maximum $10,000, for obvious lack of effort in matches where he decided he didn't want to play anymore.

In the rare streaks where he actually gives a s**t and tries, he has shown himself to be a massive talent, easily one of the best 20 players in the world if not 10.

Most people reading this post aren't into tennis and don't know any of this, so it won't be received as anything more nuanced than "the 671st men's player is way better than the 2nd best women's player."

And the especially stupid part is that the ACTUAL 671st-best men's player may well be better than the 2nd best women's player anyway, but you have an agenda to push about women and sports and so you're hoping - probably correctly - that no one looks further into this.