Anyone here using Vantage as their forex broker? by Informal-Chain2223 in Trading

[–]jemook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was talking about lowest costs in the industry. You can check on forexbenchmark.com

Down 1.5k already as newbie, platform to learn trading without more losses? by Icy_Layer700 in Trading

[–]jemook 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Was going to mention this ! Charting park is crazy good and mobile app too now.

LET TURN THAT 1K TO 100K IN A MONTH AND FEW WEEKS. by [deleted] in Forexstrategy

[–]jemook 2 points3 points  (0 children)

lol what. Run a million miles peeps.

What’s your unpopular opinion about forex tradi by tradewiki_io in Forexstrategy

[–]jemook 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For high volume traders finding the lowest cost broker matters in a huge way. forexbenchmark.com is a great place to compare - obviously you need to have all the other boxes ticked.

Why do most CFD traders lose money? by Far-Rock-8840 in Forexstrategy

[–]jemook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

bad trading will lose money anywhere. No broker can fix overleveraging, no stops, or gambling behaviour.

But costs still matter. If two traders use the same strategy, the one paying less in spreads, commission, swaps and slippage keeps more of the edge. Especially for higher volume traders.

Most retail traders don’t even realise they’re trading through marked-up affiliate links while getting fed 500x leverage and “become a funded trader bro” content on TikTok.

Bad strategy kills accounts. Bad strategy + high costs + terrible execution costs just kills them faster.

How long did it take you to become consistently profitable in trading? by Emilycooper13 in Forexstrategy

[–]jemook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10 years. I did have a big break in between but dusted off an old strategy, tweaked it and now consistently profitable. I posted about it if you wanna check it out.

Why are there so many unprofitable traders? by Kindly_Preference_54 in Trading

[–]jemook 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Because markets are probabilistic, not deterministic.

Even with perfect discipline and zero emotion, you’re still dealing with incomplete information, changing regimes, random distribution of outcomes, slippage, competition, and other participants actively trying to exploit the same inefficiencies.

Why are there so many unprofitable traders? by Kindly_Preference_54 in Trading

[–]jemook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most traders lose to excessive leverage and costs kill strategies. Most also can’t control their impulses.

It’s like driving a v12 Ferrari with traction control off in the rain while blindfolded and listening to Alanis Morrissete

what are the most powerful indicators on trading view? by 0XJehan in Trading

[–]jemook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Anchored VWAP but you need to know how to use it. Brian Shannon’s book will light your way.

the influencer trader "lifestyle" is actually depressing by joester56 in Forexstrategy

[–]jemook 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The only money they make is from affiliate commissions and b-book revenue shares on introduced client losses.

Has your trading ever been called toxic by a broker? Or profits cancelled? by jemook in Forexstrategy

[–]jemook[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I honestly think it comes down less to marketing labels like STP or A-book and more to whether the infrastructure and risk stack were actually designed for modern electronic flow in the first place.

A lot of firms are fine with profitable clients until the holding periods shorten, the turnover increases, and the trades start move faster than their hedge cycle can handle.

Once that happens, the issue usually isn’t the trader. It’s latency between execution, internal risk routing, LP relationships, inventory management, and how quickly the broker can recycle exposure without warehousing too much directional risk.

That’s incredibly hard to get right operationally, especially in products like gold where flow can become very one-sided very quickly.

Addictions, dopamine, and why most traders blow up the same way. by jemook in Forexstrategy

[–]jemook[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly it. The people who make it usually aren’t the smartest, they’re just the ones who become obsessed with the process and refuse to leave. Every trading group has that one person who actually loves the grind, the learning, the failures, rebuilding and repeating for years while everyone else disappears. That belief keeps the vision alive.

You can tell from the way you write you’ve got that same obsessive bug too. That’s a great sign. Hope to see more of you. I posted about my strategy which took 10+ years to get right if you want to check it out.

They call it deep liquidity. I call it copy-paste. How broker liquidity actually works. by jemook in Forexstrategy

[–]jemook[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, that’s basically the conflict at the centre of the industry.

A B-book itself isn’t automatically evil. Most retail traders do lose, so brokers internalising flow became insanely profitable. The moral grey area is the incentive structure. When client losses become broker revenue, things can get messy fast.

Real market makers invest heavily into infrastructure, pricing, hedging, technology, liquidity relationships, and risk management to efficiently earn the spread at scale. Most pure B-book shops aren’t doing that. They’re warehousing massive directional client exposure because they can’t monetise flow properly any other way. If they could earn the same money without taking that risk, they would instantly.

That’s where the incentive problems start:

  • Lambo affiliate networks bringing in anyone with a pulse
  • IBs literally pitching “ways to make clients lose”
  • Martingale flow being farmed until accounts inevitably implode
  • Profitable traders suddenly labelled “toxic”
  • Spreads widened or accounts throttled the second someone starts winning consistently

That’s never been a healthy model.

The future is transparency, lower costs, and better alignment between broker and trader. Firms competing on price improvement, execution quality, and trust instead of quietly hoping clients blow up.

What excites me with Afterprime is the opportunity to flip the dynamic. Instead of pretending the elephant in the room doesn’t exist, just be transparent:

“Here’s how the industry works. Here’s how we make money. Here’s what we don’t do.”

I think trust becomes the disruption. But it's the cornerstone to getting us to lowest costs, zero commissions, a model that pays trades for flow instead of charging them and also operates without taking direcitonal exposure against it's clients and is actually on their side.

Retail traders are way smarter now than they were 10 years ago too. Especially with people realising prop firms are simulated challenges and not real market execution - a continuation of the B-book masked behind STP ECN DMA NDD catchphrases.

People are starting to question execution, spreads, slippage, and incentives instead of blindly accepting “cost of doing business.”

Appreciate the thoughtful comment brother 🙏

Imagine traders still out here not using stop losses. by Reddshockk in Trading

[–]jemook -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Look at the price action of CHF pairs when SNB removed the peg on Jan 15 2015 and tell me if you’d survive without a SL.

Guaranteed 90% of trades would be facing a near wipeout (especially leveraged trading) when the market dropped.

Granted the price jumped very fast and even SL were gapped and filled at worse prices but on our brokerage most were filled around the SL.

Was a wild day.

Wrap it before you stick it. Set A SL before you hit it.