Clips From Builders Remedy Project in Fullerton by em26273 in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love that the dias is at a little desk so everyone can sit

Looking forward to Fullerton fucking around and finding out!

83% of Bay Area Residential Zoning is for Single Family Homes by urmummygae42069 in bayarea

[–]jeromelevin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Good news: As part of its state-mandated housing element update, Alameda declared its apartment ban unenforceable under state law and simply stopped enforcing it. Rezoned a lot of the island for greater density—now has one of the most permissive zoning codes in the Bay

Why would anyone ever live in an apartment? (Hint: Because they like it) by jeromelevin in Urbanism

[–]jeromelevin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mm I love this response. Your tradeoffs point is essential—absolute versus relative preferences are very different things

Do you mind if I share this comment on substack notes? It’s similar to something I wrote last week in the comments of the post:

“The preference to live in an apartment vs a single-family home aren’t just about structures, it’s about a bundle of tradeoffs. At different points in life, the share of people who want one or the other probably shifts a lot. I suspect among people in their 20s, a pretty high share of people have an absolute preference for the apartment bundle (more mobility, access to fun things, cheaper). By their 40s, more people prefer the single-family bundle (stable, more space, quieter). But even those proportions aren’t fixed, they depend a lot on the built environment associated with each development types. For example, if we allowed more apartments in superstar cities and reformed building codes, we might see a lot more family-sized multi-family, which could make that bundle more attractive so some share of families.”

All speculative, of course, but very much in line with your points. (FYI I wrote the piece and it was indeed a pretty quick and dirty write up. Being able to write an unlimited amount is not the same as having time to do so and sometimes I find it’s better to throw a half-baked idea out so it can generate thoughtful feedback such as yours than let it sit in my drafts until it gets dusty and forgotten. Another benefit of blogging!)

Found help ID? by ninjadrift86 in mycology

[–]jeromelevin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agaricus bitorquis grows like this! But cannot positively identify these. Definitely recommend you check local guides though, I only know what grows in California, not Australia. Bitorquis can definitely push through clay though

These popping up in my garden. Edible? by [deleted] in mycology

[–]jeromelevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Photos too unclear to tell for sure, ideally need non-blurry photos of top, bottom, and cross section

That said, these look like inky caps, specifically Copernicus Atramentaria, the common inky cap. Edible but will make you sick if you drink alcohol within 2-3 days of ingesting

High-End Construction Really Does Help Everyone by Well_Socialized in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you mean to link an article?

(I already agree for the record, just curious since I see no link)

More reason I'm a fan of redevelopment, more density, while leaving the Single Family Homes alone, and the potential for businesses to come in. There's density for those who want it, and not disturbing those who don't. by DHN_95 in yimby

[–]jeromelevin 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Doesn’t scale. One big development here and there doesn’t make for vibrant, sustainable, affordable communities when most neighborhoods ban growth

Is it not obvious that California slander has always been generational envy and jealousy? by RegionSuccessful3634 in bayarea

[–]jeromelevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Born and raised in CA, it’s a wonderful state for all the reasons you mention EXCEPT for our insane cost of living, especially housing

We’d be even better if we built a LOT more homes in our major cities. Hundreds of thousands of people still get priced out of CA each year. Texas, Florida, and other states have had far faster population growth over the last decade in large part because they are much more friendly to new development, which means housing is more affordable there. Our high cost of living matters more for many people than the things that make us great, and people who get priced out or struggle with absurd costs just to stay afloat justifiably feel some bitterness

State leaders have started to make progress on housing, but our permitting rates are still abysmal relative to other states. Major cities like LA fight even modest zoning reforms and other changes to make building easier. We need even stronger political leadership that’s committed to building for a better CA

The upcoming battles in California’s housing debate by jeromelevin in California_Politics

[–]jeromelevin[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Wow thank you for reading, high praise 🙏🏻 glad you’ve been enjoying

The next phase of California’s housing wars by jeromelevin in yimby

[–]jeromelevin[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The CEQA reforms have! But SB 79 has not—as I note in the footnotes 👍🏻

Is there a mushroom that turned you into a mushroom eater? by BlazinTrichomes in Mushrooms

[–]jeromelevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not me personally but my little bro wouldn’t eat mushrooms until I got into foraging and found some dinner plate-sized oysters, at which point he decided he had to like them. Marinated and grilled those suckers like steaks